Can a low prime volume arterial filter be used as an alternative for a venous bubble trap in minimal extracorporeal circulation? An in vitro investigation

Abstract

Background

During cardiac surgery the use of a minimal extracorporeal circulation (MiECC) system may reduce the adverse effects for the patient. This is probably caused by reduced inflammation and hemodilution. For the use of a MiECC circuit, a venous bubble trap (VBT) is warranted for safety reasons. The aim of this study was to assess if an arterial filter with a small prime volume has the same (or better) air removal capacities as a VBT in a MiECC circuit and subsequentially may be used as an alternative.

Methods

In an in vitro study, air removal properties were compared between the arterial filter and three VBT’s on the market, VBT160 (Getinge), VBT 8 (LivaNova and VARD (Medtronic). In a MiECC circuit, the filter devices were placed in a venous position and challenged with massive and micro air. Gaseous microemboli (GME) were measured with a bubble counter proximal and distal of the VBT device.

Results

More than 99.9 % of the air was removed after a bolus air challenge by all VBT’s. Both the VARD and the AF100 showed better GME removal properties (not significant for the AF100) compared to the other devices. All filters showed GME generation after a challenge with massive air. Compared to the other filters, only the VARD showed no passing of larger bubbles when a volume of 50 mL of air was present in the filter.

Conclusions

The AF100 seems to be a safe and low prime alternative for use in a MiECC system as a venous air trap. A word of caution, placement of the AF100 arterial filter in the venous line is off label use.

Keywords

cardiopulmonary bypass gaseous micro emboli venous bubble trap gaseous microemboli air extracorporeal circulation minimal extracorporeal circulation arterial filter

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anastasiadis

Antonitsis

Haidich

, et al. Use of minimal extracorporeal circulation improves outcome after heart surgery; a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Cardiol 2013; 164(2): 158–169.

Ranucci

Pistuddi

Carboni

, et al. Effects of priming volume reduction on allogeneic red blood cell transfusions and renal outcome after heart surgery. Perfusion 2015; 30(2): 120–126.

Ranucci

Aloisio

Carboni

, et al. Acute kidney injury and hemodilution during cardiopulmonary bypass: a changing scenario. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 100(1): 95–100.

Roosenhoff

Stehouwer

De Vroege

, et al. Air removal efficiency of a venous bubble trap in a minimal extracorporeal circuit during coronary artery bypass grafting. Artif Organs 2010; 34(12): 1092–1098.

Stehouwer

Boers

de Vroege

, et al. Clinical evaluation of the air removal characteristics of an oxygenator with integrated arterial filter in a minimized extracorporeal circuit. Int J Artif Organs 2011; 34(4): 374–382.

Stehouwer

de Vroege

. Air removal capacity of two different minimal invasive ECC systems: an in vitro comparison. Perfusion 2019; 34(7): 561–567.

Stehouwer

Kelder

van Oeveren

, et al. In vitro air removal characteristics of two neonatal cardiopulmonary bypass systems: filtration may lead to fractionation of bubbles. Int J Artif Organs 2014; 37(9): 688–696.

Taylor

Borger

Weisel

, et al. Cerebral microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass: increased emboli during perfusionist interventions. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68(1): 89–93.

Borger

Feindel

. Cerebral emboli during cardiopulmonary bypass: effect of perfusionist interventions and aortic cannulas. J Extra Corpor Technol 2002; 34(1): 29–33.

10.

Aboud

Liebing

Borgermann

, et al. Excessive negative venous line pressures and increased arterial air bubble counts during miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass: an experimental study comparing miniaturized with conventional perfusion systems. Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg 2014; 45(1): 69–74.

11.

Simons

Ganushchak

Teerenstra

, et al. Hypovolemia in extracorporeal life support can lead to arterial gaseous microemboli. Artif Organs 2013; 37(3): 276–282.

12.

Rodriguez

Rubens

Belway

, et al. Residual air in the venous cannula increases cerebral embolization at the onset of cardiopulmonary bypass. Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg 2006; 29(2): 175–180.

13.

Barak

Katz

. Microbubbles: pathophysiology and clinical implications. Chest 2005; 128(4): 2918–2932.

14.

Muth

Shank

. Gas embolism. N Engl J Med 2000; 342(7): 476–482.

15.

Fiore

Morbiducci

Ponzini

, et al. Bubble tracking through computational fluid dynamics in arterial line filters for cardiopulmonary bypass. Am Soc Artif Intern Organs J 2009; 55(5): 438–444.

16.

De Somer

. Evidence-based used, yet still controversial: the arterial filter. J Extra Corpor Technol 2012; 44(1): 27–30.

17.

Stehouwer

Legg

De Vroege

, et al. Clinical evaluation of the air-handling properties of contemporary oxygenators with integrated arterial filter. Perfusion 2017; 32(2): 118–125.