Abstract
Introduction
Del Nido cardioplegia (DN) is gaining acceptance in adult cardiac surgery but there is paucity of experimental data regarding its efficacy. We set out to assess the safety and efficacy of single-dose DN with and without topical cooling (TC) versus multi-dose blood cardioplegia (BC).
Methods
Thirty-two healthy adult sheep had pressure-volume (PV) catheters placed in the left (LV) and right (RV) ventricle. Animals were assigned to receive cold (4°C) antegrade solution for a 60-min arrest using: (1) multi-dose (every 20 min) BC with TC (n = 11), (2) single-dose DN with TC (DN-C, n = 10), or (3) single-dose DN without TC (DN-H, n = 11). LV and RV PV-derived indexes, epicardial echocardiographic strains, and blood samples were acquired before CPB and at 1, 2, and 3 h of reperfusion. Dobutamine bolus (2.5 μg) was given after 3 h to test for myocardial reserve.
Results
Time to rhythm restoration was shortest (54 ± 29 s, 118 ± 167 s, and 172 ± 170 s for DN-H, DN-C, and BC, respectively; p = 0.024) and number of shocks lowest (1.7 ± 1.8, 3.6 ± 2.8, and 5.6 ± 4.6 for DN-H, DN-C, and BC, respectively; p = 0.020) in DN-H group. Hemodynamic, load-independent myocardial function, echocardiographic, and metabolic data revealed only slight differences between groups. Troponin I levels did not differ between groups. With dobutamine, preload-recruitable stroke work of both LV (136 ± 50%, 131 ± 31%, 142 ± 58% for BC, DN-C and DN-H, respectively; p = 0.993) and RV (161 ± 67%, 185 ± 45%, 166 ± 75% for BC, DN-C and DN-H respectively; p = 0.580) increased similarly.
Conclusions
Single-dose DN cardioplegia with or without topical cooling offered comparable biventricular myocardial protection to multi-dose BC for a 60-min arrest in sheep.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
