CammertoniFBrunoPPavoneN, et al. Influence of cardiopulmonary bypass set-up and management on clinical outcomes after minimally invasive aortic valve surgery. Perfusion2021; 36: 679–687.
2.
AnastasiadisKArgiriadouHDeliopoulosA, et al. Minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC): the state-of-the-art in perfusion. J Thorac Dis2019; 11(Suppl. 10): S1507–S1514.
3.
BowdishMED’AgostinoRSThouraniVH, et al. STS adult cardiac surgery database: 2021 update on outcomes, quality, and research. Ann Thorac Surg2021; 111: 1770–1780.
4.
AnastasiadisKAntonitsisPDeliopoulosA, et al. From less invasive to minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation. J Thorac Dis2021; 13: 1909–1921.
5.
CarozzaRFazziDPietriniA, et al. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: extracorporeal circulation optimization and minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation system evolution. Perfusion2020; 35: 865–869.
6.
MoscarelliMFattouchKGaudinoM, et al. Minimal access versus sternotomy for complex mitral valve repair: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg2020; 109: 737–744.
7.
AnastasiadisKMurkinJAntonitsisP, et al. Use of minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation in cardiac surgery: principles, definitions and potential benefits. A position paper from the Minimal invasive Extra-Corporeal Technologies international Society (MiECTiS). Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2016; 22: 647–662.
8.
WahbaAMilojevicMBoerC, et al. EACTS/EACTA/EBCP Committee Reviewers. 2019 EACTS/EACTA/EBCP guidelines on cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2020; 57: 210–251.
