DelNido cardioplegia versus St Thomas cardioplegia solution in double valve replacement: a single centre experience

Abstract

Introduction:

The role of cardioplegia cannot be underrated in cardiac surgery. St Thomas solution is the most widely used cardioplegic, but needs repeated dosing. Del Nido solution provides long duration of asystole with adequate protection; but has been used mainly in paediatric patients. This study was aimed to compare Del Nido cardioplegia with St Thomas cardioplegia in adult cardiac surgeries, requiring double valve replacement and compare the outcomes.

Methodology:

This retrospective, observational, descriptive study was conducted over a time period spanning from January 2016 to December 2019. A total of 209 patients were included and were separated in two groups DC group (n = 114) and BC group (n = 95) on the basis of cardioplegic solution used. Del Nido solution was administered as single dose. Parameters noted were CPB time, cross clamp time, wean off bypass time, DC shocks given, inotropic support required, ventilation duration, duration of ICU and hospital stay.

Results:

There was significantly shorter aortic cross clamp time (72.6 ± 10.2 vs. 98.2 ± 9.2), CPB time (92.1 ± 12.3 vs.129.5 ± 11) and wean off bypass time (19.4 ± 5.9 vs. 31.3 ± 7.6) and less requirement of DC shocks (21.2% vs. 65.9%) in DC group. Inotropic requirement in immediate post-operative period was significantly less in DC group both on day of surgery (5.35 ± 1.44 vs. 7.52 ± 3.8) and 24 hours later (3.4 ± 2.12 vs. 2.18 ± 0.72). There was no significant difference in duration of ventilation, ICU and hospital stay.

Conclusion:

Del Nido can be used safely in long duration adult cardiac surgeries and in a single dose with better intra operative and immediate post-operative outcomes as compared to St Thomas solution.