Recognition of the potentially deleterious effects of esxtracorporeal circulation led to off-pump coronary artery surgery (OPCAB) experiencing a surge in popularity in the initial decade after its conception. However, OPCAB has its own limitations and technical difficulties, such as coronary access, increased left ventricular size and reduced function, which may lead to the potential for suboptimal revascularization. As an alternative technique, miniaturized extracorporeal circulation (mECC) may provide a more controlled operative field in which the heart may be manipulated whilst minimizing the inflammatory, coagulopathic and haemodilutional effects of cardiopulmonary bypass. In this review, we outline the proposed benefits of the mECC system, discuss the pitfalls associated with mECC, and directly compare mECC to ‘off-pump’ coronary surgery for a variety of clinical and non-clinical outcomes.
WarrenOJSmithAJAlexiouC. The inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass: part 1–mechanisms of pathogenesis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth2009Apr; 23(2): 223–231.
2.
WarrenOJWatretALde WitKL. The inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass: part 2–anti-inflammatory therapeutic strategies. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth2009Jun; 23(3): 384–393.
3.
KussOvon SalviatiBBorgermannJ. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score analyses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2010Oct; 140(4): 829-835, 835 e1–13.
4.
LytleBWSabikJF. On-pump and off-pump bypass surgery: tools for revascularization. Circulation2004Feb24; 109(7): 810–812.
5.
ShroyerALGroverFLHattlerB. On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med2009Nov5; 361(19): 1827–1837.
6.
CzernyMBaumerHKiloJ. Complete revascularization in coronary artery bypass grafting with and without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg2001Jan; 71(1): 165–169.
7.
WarrenOJWallaceSde WitKLVincentCDarziAWAthanasiouT. Variations in the application of various perfusion technologies in Great Britain and Ireland–a national survey. Artif Organs2010Mar; 34(3): 200–205.
8.
HarlingLWarrenOJRogersPL. How minimalized extracorporeal circulation compares with the off-pump technique in coronary artery bypass grafting. ASAIO J2010Sep-Oct; 56(5): 446–456.
9.
MurphyGSHesselEA2ndGroomRC. Optimal perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass: an evidence-based approach. Anesth Analg2009May; 108(5): 1394–1417.
10.
RimpilainenRBiancariFWistbackaJO. Outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery with miniaturized versus conventional cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion2008Nov; 23(6): 361–367.
11.
BiancariFRimpilainenR. Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing the effectiveness of miniaturised versus conventional cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery. Heart2009Jun; 95(12): 964–969.
12.
ZangrilloAGarozzoFABiondi-ZoccaiG. Miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass improves short-term outcome in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2010May; 139(5): 1162–1169.
13.
NollertGSchwabenlandIMaktavD. Miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass in coronary artery bypass surgery: marginal impact on inflammation and coagulation but loss of safety margins. Ann Thorac Surg2005Dec; 80(6): 2326–2332.
14.
ReberDBrouwerRBuchwaldD. Beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting with miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass results in a more complete revascularization when compared to off-pump grafting. Artif Organs2010Mar; 34(3): 179–184.
15.
GunaydinSSariTMcCuskerKSchonrockUZorlutunaY. Clinical evaluation of minimized extracorporeal circulation in high-risk coronary revascularization: impact on air handling, inflammation, hemodilution and myocardial function. Perfusion2009May; 24(3): 153–162.
16.
PerthelMEl-AyoubiLBendischALaasJGerigkM. Clinical advantages of using mini-bypass systems in terms of blood product use, postoperative bleeding and air entrainment: an in vivo clinical perspective. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2007Jun; 31(6): 1070-1075; discussion 1075. Erratum in: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007 Dec; 32(6): 952.
17.
PanesarSSChikweJMirzaSB. Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery may reduce the incidence of stroke in patients with significant left main stem disease. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2008Aug; 56(5): 247–255.
18.
PotgerKCMcMillanDConnollyTSouthwellJDandoHO’ShaughnessyK. Coronary artery bypass grafting: an off-pump versus on-pump review. J Extra Corpor Technol2002Dec; 34(4): 260–266.
19.
KourliourosASavelievaIKiotsekoglouAJahangiriMCammJ. Current concepts in the pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J2009Feb; 157(2): 243–252.
20.
AthanasiouTAzizOMangoushO. Does off-pump coronary artery bypass reduce the incidence of post-operative atrial fibrillation? A question revisited. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2004Oct; 26(4): 701–710.
21.
CastiglioniAVerziniAColangeloNNascimbeneSLainoGAlfieriO. Comparison of minimally invasive closed circuit versus standard extracorporeal circulation for aortic valve replacement: a randomized study. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2009Jul; 9(1): 37–41; discussion 41.
22.
El-EssawiAHajekTSkorpilJ. A prospective randomised multicentre clinical comparison of a minimised perfusion circuit versus conventional cardiopulmonary bypass. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2010Jul; 38(1): 91–97.
23.
PandayGFFischerSBauerA. Minimal extracorporeal circulation and off-pump compared to conventional cardiopulmonary bypass in coronary surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2009Nov; 9(5): 832–836.
24.
MurakamiTIwagakiHSaitoS. Equivalence of the acute cytokine surge and myocardial injury after coronary artery bypass grafting with and without a novel extracorporeal circulation system. J Int Med Res2005Mar-Apr; 33(2): 133–149.
25.
KochCGLiLVan WagonerDRDuncanAIGillinovAMBlackstoneEH. Red cell transfusion is associated with an increased risk for postoperative atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg2006Nov; 82(5): 1747–1756.
26.
ScottBHSeifertFCGrimsonRGlassPS. Resource utilization in on- and off-pump coronary artery surgery: factors influencing postoperative length of stay--an experience of 1,746 consecutive patients undergoing fast-track cardiac anesthesia. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth2005Feb; 19(1): 26–31.
27.
Abdel-RahmanUOzaslanFRisteskiPS. Initial experience with a minimized extracorporeal bypass system: is there a clinical benefit?Ann Thorac Surg2005July; 80(1): 238–243.
28.
RemadiJPRakotoariveloZMartichoPBenamarA. Prospective randomized study comparing coronary artery bypass grafting with the new mini-extracorporeal circulation Jostra System or with a standard cardiopulmonary bypass. Am Heart J2006Jan; 151(1): 198.
29.
FerrarisVAFerrarisSPSahaSP. Perioperative blood transfusion and blood conservation in cardiac surgery: the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists clinical practice guideline. Ann Thorac Surg2007May; 83(5 Suppl): S27–86.
30.
WhitsonBAHuddlestonSJSavikKShumwaySJ. Risk of adverse outcomes associated with blood transfusion after cardiac surgery depends on the amount of transfusion. J Surg Res2010Jan; 158(1): 20–27.
31.
PuskasJDThouraniVHMarshallJJ. Clinical outcomes, angiographic patency, and resource utilization in 200 consecutive off-pump coronary bypass patients. Ann Thorac Surg2001May; 71(5): 1477-1483; discussion 1483–1484.
32.
NiranjanGAsimakopoulosGKaragounisACockerillGThompsonMChandrasekaranV. Effects of cell saver autologous blood transfusion on blood loss and homologous blood transfusion requirements in patients undergoing cardiac surgery on- versus off-cardiopulmonary bypass: a randomised trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2006Aug; 30(2): 271–277.
33.
NishinakaTNishidaHEndoMMiyagishimaMOhtsukaGKoyanagiH. Less blood damage in the impeller centrifugal pump: a comparative study with the roller pump in open heart surgery. Artif Organs1996Jun; 20(6): 707–710.
34.
GerritsenWBvan BovenWJWesselinkRM. Significant reduction in blood loss in patients undergoing minimal extracorporeal circulation. Transfus Med2006Oct; 16(5): 329–334.
35.
PuehlerTHaneyaAPhilippA. Minimal extracorporeal circulation: an alternative for on-pump and off-pump coronary revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg2009Mar; 87(3): 766–772.
36.
PuskasJDWilliamsWHDukePG. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides complete revascularization with reduced myocardial injury, transfusion requirements, and length of stay: a prospective randomized comparison of two hundred unselected patients undergoing off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2003Apr; 125(4): 797–808.
37.
LattoufOMThouraniVHKilgoPD. Influence of on-pump versus off-pump techniques and completeness of revascularization on long-term survival after coronary artery bypass. Ann Thorac Surg2008Sep; 86(3): 797–805.
38.
MageeMJHebertEHerbertMA. Fewer grafts performed in off-pump bypass surgery: patient selection or incomplete revascularization?Ann Thorac Surg2009Apr; 87(4): 1113–1118; discussion 1118.
39.
van BovenWJGerritsenWBWaandersFGHaasFJAartsLP. Mini extracorporeal circuit for coronary artery bypass grafting: initial clinical and biochemical results: a comparison with conventional and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafts concerning global oxidative stress and alveolar function. Perfusion2004Jul; 19(4): 239–246.
40.
WippermannJAlbesJMHartrumpfM, K. Comparison of minimally invasive closed circuit extracorporeal circulation with conventional cardiopulmonary bypass and with off-pump technique in CABG patients: selected parameters of coagulation and inflammatory system. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2005Jul; 28(1): 127–132.
41.
MazzeiVNassoGSalamoneGCastorinoFTommasiniAAnselmiA. Prospective randomized comparison of coronary bypass grafting with minimal extracorporeal circulation system (MECC) versus off-pump coronary surgery. Circulation2007Oct16; 116(16): 1761–1767.
