Background: In an experimental setting, the performance of the LifeBox, a new portable extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (ECMO) system suitable for patient transport, is presented. Standard rectilinear percutaneous cannulae are normally employed for this purpose, but have limited flow and pressure delivery due to their rigid structure. Therefore, we aimed to determine the potential for flow increase by using self-expanding venous cannulae. Methods: Veno-arterial bypass was established in three pigs (40.6±5.1 kg). The venous line of the cardiopulmonary bypass was established by cannulation of the external jugular vein. The arterial side of the circulation was secured by cannulation of the common carotid artery. Two different venous cannulae (SmartCanula 18/36F 430mm and Biomedicus 19F) were examined for their functional integrity when used in conjunction with the centrifugal pump (500-3000 RPM) of the LifeBox system. Results: At 1500, 2000, 2500, and 3000 RPM, the blood flow increased steadily for each cannula, but remained higher in the self-expanding cannula. That is, the 19F rectilinear cannula achieved a blood flow of 0.93±0.14, 1.47±0.37, 1.9±0.68, and 1.5±0.9 l/min, respectively, and the 18/36F self-expanding cannula achieved 1.1±0.1, 1.9±0.33, 2.8±0.39 and 3.66±0.52 l/min. However, when tested for venous line pressure, the standard venous cannula achieved -29±10.7mmHg while the self-expanding cannula achieved -13.6 ±4.3mmHg at 1500 RMP. As the RPM increased from 2500 to 3000, the venous line pressure accounted for −141.9±20 and −98±7.3mmHg for the 19F rectilinear cannula and -30.6±6.4 and -45±11.6mmHg for the self-expanding cannula. Conclusion: The self-expanding cannula exhibited superior venous drainage ability when compared to the performance of the standard rectilinear cannula with the use of the LifeBox. The flow rate achieved was approximately 40% greater than the standard drainage device, with a maximal pump flow recorded at 4.3l/min.
von Segesser LKCardiopulmonary support and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiac assist. Ann Thoac Surg1999; 68: 672-677.
4.
Ferrari M., Figulla HR, Mechanische Herz-Kreislauf-Unterstützung in der Kardiologie (Circulatory assist devices in cardiology). Dtsch Med Wochenschr2005; 130: 652-656.
5.
Mehlhorn U., Brieske M., Fischer U., et al. LIFEBRIDGE B2T® - a portable, modular, rapidly available "plug-andplay" mechanical circulatory support system. Ann Thorac Surg2005; 80: 187-192.
6.
Ferrari M., Poerner TC, Brehm BR, et al. First use of a novel plug-and-play percutaneous circulatory assist device for high-risk coronary angioplasty. Acute Cardiac Care2008; 10(2): 1-5.
7.
Mueller XM, Mallabiabarrena I., Mucciolo G., von Segesser LKOptimized venous return with a self-expanding cannula: from computational fluid dynamics to clinical application. Interactive Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2002; 1: 23-27.
8.
von Segesser LK, Jegger D., Mucciolo G., et al. The Smart Canula™: a new tool for remote access in limited access cardiac surgery. Heart Surg Forum2005; 8: 241-245.
9.
Jegger D., Chassot PG, Bernath MA, et al. A novel technique using echocardiography to evaluate venous cannula performance perioperatively in CPB cardiac surgery, Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2006; 29: 525-529.
10.
von Segesser LK, Ferrari E., Delay D., Maunz O., Horisberger J., Tozzi P.Routine use of self-expanding venous cannulae for cardiopulmonary bypass: benefits and pitfalls in 100 consecutive cases , Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2008; 34: 635-640.
