Using decision-analysis and meta-analysis to predict coronary artery bypass surgical outcomes – a model for comparing off-pump surgery to miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass circuits

Abstract

Coronary artery bypass (CABG) surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has been the “gold standard” for many years. However, methods to conduct off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery with a beating heart have decreased the use of CPB. Improvements in cardiopulmonary bypass technology, using low-prime circuits with retrograde autologous prime, have demonstrated a reduction in blood use while maintaining the surgical advantage of increased revascularization associated with on-pump surgery. A meta-analysis of published randomized clinical trials was used to compare the outcomes. These outcomes included the number of grafts, hospital length of stay, and transfusion rate. They were then incorporated into a decision-analysis model to compare OPCAB with the on-pump surgery, using both conventional high-prime (HP) and low-prime circuits with retrograde autologous prime (LP/RAP). The meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials revealed that OPCAB surgery had 0.33 less grafts (p < .05), a reduction of 0.97 days in hospital length of stay (LOS) (p < .05), and a 63.2% reduction in percentage of patients transfused (p < .05). Based on the decision-analysis model, a relatively low major event rate (defined as myocardial infarction, need for angioplasty or surgery) at 4 years of 2% can eliminate the savings associated with OPCAB when compared to a low-prime circuit with RAP. Using a 5% major event rate at 4 years, the predicted cost savings of LP/RAP over OPCAB is $510 per patient or $51,036,746 per 100,000 patients. The development and implementation of low-prime circuits with retrograde autologous prime is an import step in matching the outcomes associated with OPCAB surgery.

Keywords

coronary artery bypass decision analysis off-pump surgery retrograde autologous prime

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1 Nance J Sistino JJ . Heparin-coated adult ECMO vs. ventricular assist devices: a decision analysis modeling approach. J Extracorp Tech. 2006; 38: 33–37.

2 Khan NE De Souza A Mister R . A randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary-artery bypass surgery. New Eng J Med 2004; 350: 21–28.

3 Ascione R Williams S Lloyd CT Sundaramoorthi T Pitsis AA Angelini GD . Reduced postoperative blood loss and transfusion requirement after beating-heart coronary operations: a prospective randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 121: 689–696.

4 Sabik JF Blackstone EH Lytle BW Houghtaling PL Gillinov AM Cosgrove DM . Equivalent midterm outcomes after off-pump and on-pump coronary surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127: 142–148.

5 Puskas JD Williams WH , Mahoney. Off-pump vs. conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: early and 1-year graft patency, cost, and quality-of-life outcomes: a randomized trial. JAMA 2004; 291: 1841–1849.

6 Puskas JD Williams WH Duke PG . Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides complete revascularization with reduced myocardial injury, transfusion requirements, and length of stay: a prospective randomized comparison of two hundred unselected patients undergoing off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003; 125(4): 797–808.

7 Balachandran S Cross MH Karthikeyan S Mulpur A Hansbro SD Hobson P . Retrograde autologous priming of the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit reduces blood transfusion after coronary artery surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73: 1912–1918.

8 Rosengart TK DeBois W O'Hara M . Retrograde autologous priming for cardiopulmonary bypass: a safe and effective means of decreasing hemodilution and transfusion requirements. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 115: 426–438.

9 Banbury MK White JA Blackstone EH Cosgrove DM , 3rd. Vacuum-assisted venous return reduces blood usage. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 126: 680–687.

10.

10 O'Gara PJ Natarajan V Lilly K Husain A Shapira OM Shemin RJ . Clinical outcomes of on-pump coronary bypass using heparin-bonded circuits and reduced anti-coagulation compare favorably with off-pump approach. Perfusion 2002; 17: 91–94.

11.

11 van Dijk D Nierich AP Jansen EW . Octopus Study Group. Early outcome after off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery: results from a randomized study. Circulation 2001; 104: 1761–1766.

12.

12 Czerny M Baumer H Kilo J . Complete revascularization in coronary artery bypass grafting with and without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thor Surg 2001; 71: 165–169.

13.

13 Matata BM Sosnowski AW Galinanes M . Off-pump bypass graft operation significantly reduces oxidative stress and inflammation. Ann Thor Surg 2000; 69: 785–791.

14.

14 Czerny M Baumer H Kilo J . Inflammatory response and myocardial injury following coronary artery bypass grafting with or without cardiopulmonary bypass. Euro J Cardiothorac Surg 2000; 17: 737–742.

15.

15 Cox CM Ascione R Cohen AM Davies IM Ryder IG Angelini GD . Effect of cardiopulmonary bypass on pulmonary gas exchange: a prospective randomized study. Ann Thor Surg 2000; 69: 140–145.

16.

16 Lloyd CT Ascione R Underwood MJ Gardner F Black A Angelini GD . Serum S-100 protein release and neuropsychologic outcome during coronary revascularization on the beating heart: a prospective randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovas Surg 2000; 119: 148–154.

17.

17 Ascione R Lloyd CT Underwood MJ Gomes WJ Angelini GD . On-pump versus off-pump coronary revascularization: evaluation of renal function. Ann Thor Surg 1999; 68: 493–498.

18.

18 Ascione R Lloyd CT Gomes WJ Caputo M Bryan AJ Angelini GD . Beating versus arrested heart revascularization: evaluation of myocardial function in a prospective randomized study. Euro J Cardiothorac Surg 1999; 15: 685–690.

19.

19 Prifti E Bonacchi M Frati G . Beating heart myocardial revascularization on extracorporeal circulation in patients with end-stage coronary artery disease. Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 9: 608–614.

20.

20 Guler M Kirali K Toker ME . Different CABG methods in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71: 152–157.

21.

21 Tang AT Knott J Nanson J Hsu J Haw MP Ohri SK . A prospective randomized study to evaluate the renoprotective action of beating heart coronary surgery in low risk patients. Euro J Cardiothorac Surg 2002; 22: 118–123.

22.

22 Kihara S Shimakura T Tanaka SA . Initial experience with off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Heart & Vessels 2001; 16: 9–11.

23.

23 Demers P Cartier R . Multivessel off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in the elderly. Euro J Cardiothorac Surg 2001; 20: 908–912.

24.

24 Kirk K; Aldridge R; Sistino J; . Coronary artery bypass grafting with and without cardiopulmonary bypass: a comparison analysis J Extracorp Tech 2001; 33: 86-90.

25.

25 Litmathe J Boeken U Feindt P Gams E . Predictors of homologous blood transfusion for patients undergoing open heart surgery. Thorac Cardiovas Surg 2003; 51: 17–21.

26.

26 Amin M Fergusson D Wilson K . The societal unit cost of allogenic red blood cells and red blood cell transfusion in Canada. Transfusion 2004; 44: 1479–1486.

27.

27 Fine MJ Pratt HM Obrosky DS . Relation between length of hospital stay and costs of care for patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Am J Med 2000; 109: 434–436.

28.

28 Talley JD Ohman EM Mark DB . Economic implications of the prophylactic use of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in the setting of acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1997; 79: 590–594.

29.

29 Lauer MA Karweit JA Cascade EF Lin ND Topol EJ . Practice patterns and outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions in the United States: 1995 to 1997. Amer J Card. 2002; 89: 924–929.

30.

30 Puskas JD Thourani VH Marshall JJ . Clinical outcomes, angiographic patency, and resource utilization in 200 consecutive off-pump coronary bypass patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71: 1477–1483.