Incident-simulating device with wireless control for extracorporeal circulation crisis management drills

Abstract

Incidents during extracorporeal circulation (ECC) may lead to serious consequences, and troubleshooting exercises are becoming more important. We developed an incident-simulation device operated by remote control for ECC crisis management drills, and evaluated its efficacy at a seminar for perfusionists. This compact device consists of a transmitter and a receiving system and is run by dry batteries without a personal computer. A 4-channel radio-control system is used as the transmitter, and four servomotors placed in a box as the receiving system. To simulate occlusion of 3/8” arterial and venous lines, two servomotors with a rod rotate and the rod compresses the tube. The tilt angle of the stick and the servomotor rotation are in proportion, so that the degree of occlusion is controlled. As a result, the tube lumen becomes “stenotic” and then occluded, depending on the rotation. To cut off the power, the other two servomotors, with a relay system, work as a breaker. When the rod of the servomotor rotates, a micro-switch is turned off. The present device is able to increase perfusion pressure quickly and to simulate inadequate venous drainage quietly. At a seminar for perfusionists, an instructor manipulated the transmitter to create incidents and the participants handled the events effectively. In conclusion, incidents created by this device were perceived as similar to real ECC crises and this device may be useful and educationally effective when used in crisis management drills for perfusionists and trainees.

Keywords

extracorporeal circulation simulation device wireless safety crisis management drill

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1 Ginther R Fillingham R Searles B Darling E . Departmental use of perfusion crisis management drills: 2002 survey results. Perfusion 2003; 18(5): 299–302.

2 Eason MP . Simulation devices in cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2005; 9(4): 309–323.

3 Morris RW Pybus DA . “Orpheus” cardiopulmonary bypass simulation system. J Extra Corpor Technol 2007; 39(4): 228–233.

5 Iddan G Meron G Glukhovsky A Swain P . Wireless capsule endoscopy. Nature 2000; 405(6785): 417–418.

6 Taylor RH Stoianovici D . Medical robotics in computer-integrated surgery. IEEE transactions on robotics and automation 2003; 19(5): 765–781.

7 Corno AF Sekarski N Bernath MA Payot M Tozzi P von Segesser LK . Pulmonary artery banding: long-term telemetric adjustment. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003; 23(3): 317–322.

8 Merkle F . Perfusion education and training in Europe. Perfusion 2006; 21(1): 3–12.

9 Miller BJ Gibbon JH Fineberg C . An improved mechanical heart and lung apparatus; its use during open cardiotomy in experimental animals. Med Clin North Am 1953; 37: 1603–1624.

10.

10 Kawatani Y Iwahana M Sugahara S . A problem in extended operating room design turns out due to power failure during surgery: a case report. J Jpn Assoc Operat Room Tech 2003; 24(1): 63–66.

11.

12.

12 Tomizawa Y . Trouble simulation course for extracorporeal circulation: experiences from wet lab. Jpn J Artif Organs 2006; 35(1): 233–226.

13.

13 Tomizawa Y Momose N Matayoshi T Yozu R Takamoto S . Safety measures of extracorporeal circulation by heart surgeons and perfusionists. Kyobu Geka 2007; 60(12): 1055–1059.

14.

14 Ninomiya S Tokumine A Yasuda T Tomizawa Y . Development of an educational simulator system, ECCSIM-Lite, for the acquisition of basic perfusion techniques and evaluation. J Artif Organs 2007; 10(4): 201–205.

15.

15 Tomizawa Y Momose N . Certified perfusionists in Japan. J Artif Organs 2007; 10(2): 122–123.

16.

16 Graves K . Perfusion safety in Europe: managing risks, learning from mistakes. Perfusion 2005; 20(4): 209–215.