This article attempts to evaluate several arguments that have been put forth in favour of special nativism in SLA. Specifically, the cases for each of the following claims are considered: 1) that Universal Grammar (UG) being implicated in L2 acquisition is the null hypothesis; 2) that any theory of SLA necessarily needs a theory of grammar; and 3) that showing that interlanguage grammars are underdetermined by the available input implies that UG must be accessible in L2 learning. In each case, it is argued that the arguments for special nativism are not compelling, and that it is therefore reasonable to consider a research programme in SLA theory that is based on general nativism.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bley-Vroman, R.1989: What is the logical problem of foreign language learning? In Gass, S. and Schachter, J., editors, Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 41-68.
2.
Chomsky, N.1981: Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
3.
— 1982: On the generative enterprise: a discussion with Riny Huybregts and Henk van Riemsdijk. Dordrecht: Foris.
4.
— 1986: Knowledge of language: its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.
5.
Clahsen, H. and Muysken, P.1986: The availability of Universal Grammar to adult and child learners: the study of the acquisition of German word order. Second Language Research2, 92-119.
6.
DuPlessis, J., Solin, D., Travis, L. and White, L.1987: UG or not UG, that is the question. Second Language Research3, 56-75.
7.
Eckman, F., Moravcsik, E. and Wirth, J.1989: Implicational universals and interrogative structures in the interlanguage of EL learners. Language Learning39, 173-205.
8.
Eubank, L., editor, 1991: Point/counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
9.
Flynn, S.1987: A parameter setting model of L2 acquisition. Dordrecht: Reidel.
10.
— 1993. Interactions between L2 acquisition and linguistic theory . In Eckman, F., editor, Confluence: linguistics, L2 acquisition and speech pathology, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 15-35.
11.
Gregg, K.1989: Second language acquisition theory: the case for a generative perspective. In Gass, S. and Schachter, J., editors, Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 15-40.
12.
— 1990: The variable competence model of second language acquisition and why it isn't. Applied Linguistics11, 364-383.
13.
— 1993: Taking explanation seriously; or, let a couple of flowers bloom. Applied Linguistics14, 276-94.
14.
Hilles, S.1991: Access to Universal Grammar in second language acquisition . In Point/counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language , Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA : John Benjamins, 305-38.
15.
Manzini, M.R. and Wexler, K.1987: Parameters, Binding Theory and learnability. Linguistic Inquiry, 18, 413-444.
16.
O'Grady, W.1991: Categories and case: the sentence structure of Korean . Philadelphia, PA and Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
17.
Schachter, J.1989: Testing a proposed universal. In Gass, S. and Schachter, J., editors, Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 73-88.
18.
1990: On the issue of completeness in second language acquisition . Second Language Research6, 93-124.
19.
Schwartz, B.1989: L2 knowledge: what is the null hypothesis? Paper presented at the 1989 Boston University conference on language development.
20.
Schwartz, B. and Tomaselli, A., 1990: Analysing the acquisition stages of negation in L2 German: support for UG in adult SLA. Second Language Research6, 1-38.
21.
Thomas, M.1991: Universal Grammar and the interpretation of reflexives in a second language. Language67, 211-39.
22.
Wexler, K. and Culicover, P.W.1980: Formal principles of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23.
White, L.1989: Universal Grammar and second language acquisition. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
24.
— 1995: Input, triggers and second language acquisition: can binding be taught? In Eckman, F., Highland, D., Lee, P., Mileham, J. and Rutkowski Weber, R., editors, Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 63-78.
