This article critiques Pienemann and Johnston (1987), an influential model of the acquisition of ESL morphology. While Pienemann and Johnston claimed that their model is confirmed and supported by the generative approach to morphology developed in Selkirk (1982), this article indicates that Selkirk's lexicalist theory actually opposes their proposals. In addition, this article demonstrates that their proposals are incompatible with syntactic analyses of word formation. The widespread influence of the Pienemann and Johnston model suggests that L2 researchers must ensure that models of SLA are solidly grounded in foundational theories.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bachman, L.1991: What does language testing have to offer?TESOL Quarterly25, 671-704.
2.
Brindley, G.1996: Describing language development? Rating scales and second language acquisition. In Bachman, L.F. and Cohen, A.D., editors, Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Buczowska E. and Weist, R.1991: The effects of formal instruction on the second-language acquisition of temporal location. Language Learning41, 535-54.
4.
Burton, J.1987: Acquiring SLA research approaches to teacher development . In Ninan, D., editor, Applying second language acquisition research, Adelaide : National Curriculum Resource Centre, Adult Migrant Education Programme.
5.
Chomsky, N.1975: The logical structure of linguistic theory. New York: Plenum Press.
6.
— 1981: Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
7.
— 1989: Some notes on economy of derivation and representation . MIT Working Papers in Linguistics10, 43-74.
8.
— 1993: A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In Hale, K. and Keyser, S.J. , editors, The view from building 20: essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
Chomsky, N. and Lasnik, H.1993: Principles and parameters theory. In Jacobs, J., von Stechow, A., Sternfeld, W. and Vennemann, T., editors, Syntax: an international handbook of contemporary research, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
10.
Cook, V.1991: Second language learning and language teaching. London: Edward Arnold.
11.
Crookes, G.1989: Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition11, 367-83.
12.
duPlessis, J., Solin, D., Travis, L. and White, L.1987: UG or not UG, that is the question: a reply to Clahsen and Muysken. Second Language Research3, 56-75.
13.
Ellis, R.1994: The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
Hatch, E.1983: Psycholinguistics: a second language perspective. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
15.
Haugen, E.1956: Bilingualism in the Americas: a bibliography and research guide. Publication of theAmerican Dialect Society26. University, AL: University of Alabama Press.
16.
Hudson, T.1993: Nothing does not equal zero: Problems with applying developmental sequence findings to assessment and pedagogy. Studies in Second Language Acquisition15, 461-93.
17.
Huebner, T.1983: Linguistic systems and linguistic change in an interlanguage . Studies in Second Language Acquisition6, 33-53.
18.
Hulstijn, J.1992: Onset or development of grammatical features? Comments on Pienemann's approach to acquisition orders. Unpublished MS, Free University, Amsterdam.
19.
Johnston, M.1985: Syntactic and morphological progressions in learner English . Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Immigration and Ethnic Affairs.
20.
Krashen, S.1982: Principles and practice in second language acquisition . New York: Pergamon Press.
21.
Larsen-Freeman, D.1991: Second language acquisition research: staking out the territory. TESOL Quarterly25, 315-50.
22.
Larsen-Freeman, D. and Long, M.1991: An introduction to second language acquisition research . London: Longman.
23.
Liu, G.1991: Interaction and second language acquisition: a case study of a Chinese child's acquisition of English as a second language. PhD dissertation , La Trobe University.
24.
Long, M.1990: The least a second language acquisition theory needs to explain. TESOL Quarterly24, 649-66.
25.
— 1993: Assessment strategies for second language acquisition theories. Applied Linguistics14, 225-49.
26.
Long, M. and Crookes, G.1992: Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly26, 27-56.
27.
Loschky, L. and Bley-Vroman, R.1993: Grammar and task-based methodology. In Crookes, G. and Gass, S. , Editors, Tasks and language learning: integrating theory and practice, Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
28.
Mason, B.1996: A validation study of the Multi-dimensional Model. Unpublished MA, La Trobe University.
29.
Meisel, J., Clahsen, H. and Pienemann, M.1981: On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition3, 109-35.
30.
Mellow, J.D. and Cumming, A.1994: Concord in interlanguage: efficiency or priming? Applied Linguistics15, 442-73.
31.
Nicholas, H.1985: Learner variation and the Teachability Hypothesis. In Hyltenstam, K. and Pienemann, M., editors, Modelling and assessing second language acquisition, Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
32.
Nunan, D.1989: Toward a collaborative approach to curriculum development: a case study. TESOL Quarterly23, 9-25.
33.
Pica T.1983: Adult acquisition of English as a second language under different conditions of exposure. Language Learning33, 465-97.
34.
Pienemann, M.1984: Psychological constraints on the teachability of language . Studies in Second Language Acquisition6, 109-35.
35.
— 1989: Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics10, 52-79.
36.
— 1992: Psycholinguistic mechanisms in second language acquisition . Unpublished MS, University of Sydney.
37.
Pienemann, M. and Johnston, M.1987: Factors influencing the development of language proficiency . In Nunan, D., editor, Applying second language acquisition research, Adelaide : National Curriculum Resource Centre, Adult Migrant Education Programme.
38.
— 1988: Processing constraints and learnability. Unpublished MS, University of Sydney.
39.
Pienemann, M., Johnston, M. and Brindley, G.1988: Constructing an acquisition-based procedure for second language assessment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition10, 217-43.
40.
Pienemann, M., Johnston, M. and Meisel, J.1993: The multi-dimensional model, linguistic profiling and related issues: a reply to Hudson. Studies in Second Language Acquisition15, 495-503.
41.
Pollock, J.1989: Verb-movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 365-424.
42.
Ritter, E.1992: Cross-linguistic evidence for number phrase. Canadian Journal of Linguistics37, 197-218.
43.
Selkirk, E.1982: The syntax of words. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
44.
Skehan, P.1991: Progress in language testing: the 1990s. In Alderson, J.C. and North, B., editors, Language testing in the 1990s: the communicative legacy, London: Modern English Publications and The British Council.
45.
Spada, N. and Lightbown, P.1993: Instruction and the development of questions in L2 classrooms . Studies in Second Language Acquisition15, 205-24.
46.
Speas, M.1991: Functional heads and the Mirror Principle. Lingua84, 181-214.
47.
Spencer, A.1991: Morphological theory: an introduction to word structure in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
48.
Tarone, E.1988: Variation in interlanguage. London : Edward Arnold.
49.
— 1993: Second-language acquisition in a variationist framework . Paper presented at the 22nd University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Linguistics Symposium, 9 October.
50.
— 1996: Research on interlanguage variation: implications for language testing. In Bachman, L.F. and Cohen, A.D., editors, Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51.
Tomaselli, A. and Schwartz, B.1990: Analysing the acquisition stages of negation in L2 German: support for UG in adult SLA. Second Language Research6, 1-38.
52.
VanPatten, B.1984: Processing strategies and morpheme acquisition. In Eckman, F., Bell, L. and Nelson, D., editors, Universals in second language acquisition, Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
53.
— 1994: Cognitive aspects of processing in second language acquisition . In Hashemipour, P., Maldonado, I. and van Naerssen, M., editors, Studies in language learning and Spanish linguistics: in honor of Tracy D. Terrell, New York: McGraw-Hill.
54.
van Riemsdijk, H. and Williams, E.1986: Introduction to the theory of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55.
White, L.1989: Universal Grammar and second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
56.
— 1991: Second language competence versus second language performance: UG or processing strategies? In Eubank, L. , editor, Point counterpoint, Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
