This article is a defence of the Full Transfer/Full Access (FT/FA) model. FT/FA hypothesizes that the initial state of L2 acquisition is the final state of L1 acquisition (Full Transfer) and that failure to assign a representation to input data will force subsequent restructurings, drawing from options of UG (Full Access). We illustrate the FT/FA model by reviewing our analysis of the developmental Turkish-German Interlanguage data of Schwartz and Sprouse (1994) and then turn to other data that similarly receive straightforward accounts under FT/FA.
We also consider two other competing hypotheses, both of which accept Full Access but not Full Transfer: the Minimal Trees hypothesis (no transfer of functional categories) of Vainikka and Young-Scholten (1994; 1996) and the Weak Transfer hypothesis (no transfer of the values associated with functional categories) of Eubank (1993/94). We provide an example of (extremely robust) L2 acquisition data that highlight the inadequacy of the Minimal Trees hypothesis in regard to stages of Interlanguage subsequent to the L2 initial state. As for Weak Transfer, we show that the morphosyntactic empirical foundations which drive the entire approach are flawed; hence the Weak Transfer hypothesis remains without motivation.
Finally, we consider several conceptual issues relating to transfer. These all argue that the FT/FA model provides the most coherent picture of the L2 initial cognitive state. In short, FT/FA embodies the most suitable programme for understanding comparative Interlanguage development.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abney, S.1987: The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology .
2.
Bailey, N., Madden, C. and Krashen, S.1974: Is there a 'natural sequence' in adult second language learning? Language Learning24, 235-43.
3.
Baker, M.1988: Incorporation: a theory of grammatical function changing . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Bley-Vroman, R.1983: The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: the case of systematicity. Language Learning33, 1-17.
6.
Chomsky, N.1991: Some notes on economy of derivation and representation . In Freidin, R., editor, Principles and parameters in comparative grammar, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 417-54.
7.
— 1993: A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In Hale, K. and Keyser, S.J. , editors, The view from Building 20: essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1-52.
8.
Chomsky, N. and Lasnik, H.1993: Principles and parameters theory. In Jacobs, J., von Stechow, A., Sternefeld, W. and Vennemann, T., editors, Syntax: an international handbook of contemporary research, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 506-69.
9.
Clahsen, H., Eisenbeiß, S. and Vainikka, A.1994: The seeds of structure: a syntactic analysis of the acquisition of case marking. In Hoekstra, T. and Schwartz, B.D., editors, Language acquisition studies in generative grammar: papers in honor of Kenneth Wexler from the 1991 GLOW workshops, Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 85-118.
10.
Dulay, H. and Burt, M.1974: Natural sequences in child second language acquisition . Language Learning24, 37-53.
11.
Emonds, J.1978: The verbal complex V'-V in French. Linguistic Inquiry9, 151-75.
12.
Eubank, L.1993/94: On the transfer of parametric values in L2 development . Language Acquisition3,183-208.
13.
— 1994: Optionality and the initial state in L2 development. In Hoekstra, T. and Schwartz, B.D., editors, Language acquisition studies in generative grammar: papers in honor of Kenneth Wexler from the 1991 GLOW workshops , Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins , 369-88.
14.
Gerbault, J.1978: The acquisition of English by a five-year-old French speaker. Unpublished MA thesis, University of California at Los Angeles.
15.
Grimshaw, J. and Rosen, S.1990: Knowledge and obedience: the developmental status of the binding theory. Linguistic Inquiry21, 187-222.
16.
Håkansson, G.1994: On the unmarked word order in the acquisition of German by Swedish and Danish school-children. MS, University of Lund.
17.
Hawkins, R., Towell, R. and Bazergui, N.1993: Universal Grammar and the acquisition of French verb movement by native speakers of English. Second Language Research9, 189-233.
18.
Hoekstra, T. and Jordens, P.1994: From adjunct to head. In Hoekstra, T. and Schwartz, B.D., editors, Language acquisition studies in generative grammar: papers in honor of Kenneth Wexler from the 1991 GLOW workshops, Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 119-49.
19.
Hyams, N. and Hoekstra, T.1994: The syntax and pragmatics of early clause structure. MS , University of California at Los Angeles/ University of Leiden.
20.
Iversen, R.1918: Syntaxen i Tromsø bymål: en kort oversigt. Kristiania.
21.
Kayne, R.1994: The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22.
Klein, W. and Perdue, C.1992: Utterance structure (developing grammars again) . Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins .
23.
Lakshmanan, U.1993/94: 'The boy for the cookie' - some evidence for the nonviolation of the Case Filter in child second language acquisition. Language Acquisition3, 55-91.
24.
Lakshmanan, U. and Selinker, L.1994: The status of CP and the tensed complementizer in the developing grammars of English. Second Language Research10, 25-48.
25.
Lalleman, J.1983: The principle of elimination: establishing word order regularities in the Dutch of foreign workers. Linguistische Berichte87, 40-63.
26.
Meisel, J.M., Clahsen, J. and Pienemann, M.1981: On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition3, 109-35.
27.
Platzack, C.1994: The initial hypothesis of syntax: a minimalist perspective on language acquisition and attrition. Working Papers in ScandinavianSyntax54, 59-88.
28.
Platzack, C. and Holmberg, A.1989: The role of AGR and finiteness. Working Papers in ScandinavianSyntax43, 51-76.
29.
Pollock, J.-Y.1989: Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry20, 365-424.
30.
Rizzi, L. and Roberts, I.1989: Complex inversion in French. Probus1, 1-30.
31.
Rohrbacher, B.1992: English AUX"NEG, mainland Scandinavian AUX"NEG, and the theory of V to I raising. MS, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
32.
— 1994: The Germanic VO languages and the full paradigm: a theory of V to I raising. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
33.
Schwartz, B.D.1987: The modular basis of second language acquisition. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Southern California .
34.
— 1993a: An alternative account of apparent inaccessibility to UG in L2A. In Tsimpli, I.-M., editor, Newcastle and Durham Working Papers in Linguistics 1, 240-50.
35.
— 1993b: On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition15, 147-63.
36.
— 1996: On two hypotheses of 'transfer' in L2A: Minimal Trees and Absolute L1 Influence. In Flynn, S., Martohardjono, G. and O'Neil, W., editors, The generative study of second language acquisition , Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (in press).
37.
Schwartz, B.D. and Sprouse, R.A.1994: Word order and nominative case in nonnative language acquisition: a longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German Interlanguage. In Hoekstra, T. and Schwartz, B.D., editors, Language acquisition studies in generative grammar: papers in honor of Kenneth Wexler from the 1991 GLOW workshops , Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins , 317-68.
38.
— 1995a: L2 cognitive states and absolute L1 influence . MS, University of Durham/Indiana University.
39.
— 1995b: Why the initial state in LZA is the steady state from LIA: a reply to Eubank (1993/94). MS, University of Durham/Indiana University.
40.
Sprouse, R.A.1995: Paper presented at Germanic Linguistics: the First Annual Conference. Ann Arbor, MI, 20 April. MS, Indiana University.
41.
Tiphine, U.1983: The acquisition of English statements and interrogatives by French-speaking children. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Kiel.
42.
— no date: The acquisition of English negation by four French children . MS, University of Kiel.
43.
Trahey, M. and White, L.1993: Positive evidence and preemption in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition15, 181-204.
44.
Vainikka, A. and Young-Scholten, M.1994: Direct access to X'-theory: evidence from Korean and Turkish adults learning German. In Hoekstra, T. and Schwartz, B.D., editors, Language acquisition studies in generative grammar: papers in honor of Kenneth Wexler from the 1991 GLOW workshops, Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 265-316.
45.
— 1996: Gradual development of L2 phrase structure. Second Language Research12, 7-39.
46.
Van Riemsdijk, H., editor, 1996: Clitics in the languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter (in press).
47.
Verrips, M. and Weissenborn, J.1992: Routes to verb placement in early German and French: the independence of finiteness and agreement. In Meisel, J.M., editor, The acquisition of verb placement: functional categories and V2 phenomena in language acquisition, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 283-331.
48.
Vikner, S.1995: Verb movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic languages . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
49.
Weinreich, U.1953: Languages in contact. New York : Linguistic Circle of New York.
50.
White, L.1986: Implications of parametric variation for adult second language acquisition: an investigation of the 'pro-drop' parameter . In Cook, V., editor, Experimental approaches to second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon, 55-72.
51.
— 1989: Universal Grammar and second language acquisitionPhiladelphia, PA: John Benjamins .
52.
— 1990/91 : The verb-movement parameter in second language acquisition . Language Acquisition1, 337-60.
53.
— 1991: Adverb placement in second language acquisition: some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research7, 133-61.
54.
— 1992a: Long and short verb movement in second language acquisition . Canadian Journal of Linguistics37, 273-86.
55.
— 1992b: On triggering data in L2 acquisition: a reply to Schwartz and Gubula-Ryzak. Second Language Research8, 120-37.
56.
Zwart, C.J.-W.1993: Dutch syntax: a minimalist approach. Unpublished PhD dissertation , University of Groningen.
