Sokolik and Smith (1992) conducted three computer modelling experiments involving the learning of French gender attribution using a connectionist architecture. Their device learns to classify nouns quickly, given only letter-plus-position information about word spellings and feedback about the match between the target and the device's output. In particular, the device is not programmed with rules nor does it acquire any. Sokolik and Smith conclude that their model of gender attribution and the acquisition thereof has relevance for SLA. In these remarks, I show why this conclusion is wrong.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arbib, M.A.1987: Modularity and interaction of brain regions underlying visuomotor coordination. In Garfield, J.L. , editor, Modularity in knowledge representation and natural-language understanding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
2.
Berwick, R.C.1985: The acquisition of syntactic knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
Bruce, V. and Green, P.R.1985: Visual perception: physiology, psychology, and ecology . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4.
Carroll, S.1989: Second-language acquisition and the computational paradigm . Language Learning39, 535-94.
5.
Chaudron, C.1977: Teachers' priorities in correcting learners' errors in French immersion classes. Working Papers in Bilingualism12, 22-44.
6.
— 1986: The role of error correction in second language teaching . Working Papers 5, 43-81. Manoa, HI: Department of ESL, University of Hawai'i at Manoa.
7.
Corbett, G.1991: Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Courchêne, R.1980: The error analysis hypothesis, the contrastive analysis hypothesis, and the correction of error in the second language classroom. Parts I and II. TESL Talk11, 3-13, and 11, 10-29.
9.
Fanselow, J.1977: The treatment of error in oral work. Foreign Language Annals10, 583-93.
10.
Fodor, J.A. and Pylyshyn, Z.1988: Connectionism and cognitive architecture: a critical analysis . In Pinker, S. and Mehler, J., editors, Connections and symbols. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books. Reprinted from Cognition1988, 28: 3-71.
11.
Grévise, M.1980: Le bon usage (11th edn). Paris: Editions J. Duculot.
12.
Harris, J.W.1991: The exponence of gender in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry22,27-62.
13.
Haugeland, J.1989: Artificial intelligence: the very idea. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressBradford Books.
14.
Lucas, E.1975: Teachers' reacting moves following errors made by pupils in post-primary English as a second language class in Israel. MA thesis, School of Education, Tel Aviv University.
15.
Maratsos, M. and Chalkley, M.A.1980: The internal language of children's syntax. The ontogenesis and representation of syntactic categories. In Nelson, K. E., editor, Children's Language. Vol. II. New York: Gardner .
16.
Marr, D.1982: Vision: a computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Francisco, CA : W. H. Freeman.
17.
Mayhew, J. and Frisby, J.1984: Computer vision. In O'Shea, T. and Eisenstadt, M., editors, Artifical intelligence: tools, techniques, and applications. New York: Harper & Row.
18.
Morin, Y.-C.1982: Analogie, quatrième proportionnelle et terminaison thématique . Revue de l'Association Québécoise de linguistique2,127-43.
19.
Müller, N.1990: Developing two gender assignment systems simultaneously . In Meisel, J.M., editor, Two first languages - early grammatical development in bilingual children . Dordrecht: Foris.
20.
Pinker, S.1989: Learnability and cognition: the acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
21.
Pylyshyn, Z.W.1985: Computation and cognition: toward a foundation for cognitive science (2nd edn). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
22.
Roca, I.M.1989: The organization of grammatical gender. Transactions of the Philological Society87, 1-32.
23.
Sokolik, M.E. and Smith, M.E.1992: Assignment of gender to French nouns in primary and secondary language: a connectionist model. Second Language Research8, 39-58.
24.
Stillings, N.1987: Introduction to Part IV: the visual module. In Garfield, J. L., editor, Modularity in knowledge representation and natural-language understanding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
25.
Surridge, M.E.1985: Le genre grammatical des composes en français. TheCanadian Journal of Linguistics30, 247-72.
26.
— 1986: Genre grammatical et derivation lexicale en français. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics31, 267-84.
27.
Swain, M. and Carroll, S.1987: The immersion observation study. In Harley, B., Allen, P., Cummins, J. and Swain, M. , editors, The development of bilingual proficiency. Final report. Vol II: classroom treatment. Toronto: Modern Language Centre, OISE.
28.
Tucker, G.R., Lambert, W.F. and Rigault, A.G.1977: The French speaker's skill with grammatical gender. The Hague: Mouton.
29.
Tucker, G.R., Lambert, W.F., Rigault, A.G. and Segalowitz, N.1968: A psychological investigation of French speakers' skill with grammatical gender. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour7, 312-16.
