In this article I discuss the various components necessary for a formal model of the acquisition of the prosodic phonology of a second language. I outline a model that includes an explicit theory of the representation of metrical knowledge (Dresher and Kaye, 1990; Idsardi, 1992) and the necessary learn ing theory to account for how those representations can be acquired. The learning theory which mediates the interaction between Universal Grammar (UG) and the linguistic environment is composed of such elements as appro priate cues, indirect negative evidence and a principle of lexical dependency.
Empirical investigations of the acquisition of English metrical parameters by native speakers of Polish, Hungarian and Spanish are reported. Group data as well as case studies are presented. The data suggest that, in the domain of prosodic phonology, both the representations (metrical structure) and processes (learning principles) evidenced in second language learners are the same as those proposed for native speakers. Interlanguage grammars can be seen as a combination of UG principles, correct L2 parameter set tings (from resetting) and incorrect L1 parameter settings (from L1 trans fer).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Archibald, J.1992a: Transfer of L1 parameter settings: some empirical evidence from Polish metrics. Canadian Journal of Linguistics37, 301-39.
2.
— 1992b: Adult abilities and L2 speech. In Leather, J. and James, A., editors, New Sounds 92. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, 1-16.
3.
— 1993a: Language learnability and L2 phonology: the acquisition of metrical parameters. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
4.
— 1993b: The learnability of English metrical parameters by Spanish speakers. International Review of Applied Linguistics31, 129-42.
5.
— 1993c: Metrical universals and second language acquisition. Paper presented at the AILA Congress in Amsterdam, August.
6.
— 1993d: Indirect negative evidence and blame assignment in L2 parameter resetting. Paper presented at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Linguistics Symposium, October.
7.
— 1993e: Metrical phonology and the acquisition of L2 stress. In Eckman, F., editor, Confluence: the interaction of linguistics, second language acquisition, and speech pathology . Amsterdam: Benjamins, 37-48.
8.
—, editor, in press a: Phonological acquisition and phonological theory . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9.
— in press b: The acquisition of stress. In Archibald, J., editor, Phonological acquisition and phonological theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10.
— in press c: Metrical parameters and lexical dependency. In Flynn, S., Martohardjono, G. and O'Neil, W., editors, Generative approaches to second language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11.
Bromberger, S. and Halle, M.1991: Why phonology is different. In Kasher, A., editor, The Chomskyan turn. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
12.
Broselow, E.1988: Prosodic phonology and the acquisition of a second language . In Flynn, S. and O'Neil, W., editors, Linguistic theory in second language acquisition. Dordrecht: Reidel, 295-308.
13.
Broselow, E. and Park, H.-B. in press: Mora conservation in second language prosody. In Archibald, J., editor, Phonological acquisition and phonological theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14.
Brown, C.1993: The role of the L1 grammar in the L2 acquisition of segmental structure. McGill WorkingPapers in Linguistics9,180-210.
15.
Carroll, S. and Swain, M.1993: Explicit and implicit negative feedback: an empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition15, 357-86.
16.
Chomsky, N.1981: Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
17.
Dresher, E. and Kaye, J.1990: A computational learning model for metrical phonology . Cognition34, 137-95.
18.
Durand, J.1990: Generative and non-linear phonology. London: Longman.
19.
Echols, C. and Newport, E.1992: The role of stress and position in determining first words . Language Acquisition2,189-220.
20.
Flege, J. and Bohn, O.-S.1989: An instrumental study of vowel reduction and stress placement in Spanish-accented English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition11, 35-62.
21.
Gibson, E. and Wexler, K.1992: Triggers. Unpublished manuscript, MIT.
22.
Gleitman, L.R., Gleitman, H., Landau, B. and Wanner, E.1988: Where learning begins: initial representations for language learning. In Newmeyer, F., editor, Linguistics: the Cambridge survey. Vol. 3. Language: psychological and biological processes. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
23.
Goldsmith, J.1990: Autosegmental and metrical phonology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
24.
Grosjean, F. and Gee, J.P.1987: Prosodic structure and spoken word recognition. Cognition25, 135-55.
25.
Halle, M. and Idsardi, W.1992: General properties of stress and metrical systems. Unpublished manuscript.
26.
Hancin-Bhatt, B. and Bhatt, R.M.1992: On the nature of L1 filter and cross-language transfer effects. In Leather, J. and James, A., editors, New sounds 92. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, 18—28.
27.
Harris, J.1983: Syllable structure and stress in Spanish. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
Idsardi, W.1992: The computation of prosody. Unpublished MIT thesis.
29.
James, A.R.1988: The acquisition of a second language phonology. Tübingen: Narr.
30.
Kenstowicz, M.1994: Phonology in generative grammar. Oxford : Basil Blackwell.
31.
Kløve, M.1992: Principles and constraints on SLA phonology. In Leather, J. and James, A. , editors, New sounds 92. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, 113-21.
32.
Lasnik, H.1990: On certain substitutes for negative data. in Lasnik, H., editor, Essays on restrictiveness and learnability. Dordrecht: Kluwer , 184-97.
33.
Libben, G.1993: Are morphological structures computed during word recognition ? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research22, 535-44.
34.
Lightfoot, D.1991: How to set parameters. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
35.
Mairs, J.L.1989: Stress assignment in interlanguage phonology: an analysis of the stress system of Spanish speakers learning English. In Gass, S. and Schachter, J. , editors, Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 260-84.
36.
Marcus, G., Pinker, S., Ullman, M., Rosen, T.J. and Xu, F.1992: Over-regularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. Serial no. 228, Vol. 57, no. 4.
37.
Newson, M.1990: Dependencies in the lexical setting of parameters: a solution to the undergeneralization problem. In Roca, I.M., editor, Logical issues in language acquisition. Dordrecht: Foris, 177-98.
38.
Pater, J.1993: Theory and methodology in the study of metrical parameter (re)setting. McGill WorkingPapers in Linguistics9, 211-44.
39.
Pinker, S.1989: Learnability and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40.
Prince, A. and Smolensky, P. undated: Optimality theory. Technical Report 2. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University.
41.
Rice, K. and Avery, P. in press: Variability in a deterministic model of language acquisition: a theory of segmental elaboration. In Archibald, J., editor, Phonological acquisition and phonological theory . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42.
Roca, I.1992: On the sources of word prosody. Phonology9, 267—87.
43.
Saleemi, A.1992: Universal Grammar and language learnability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Schwartz, B. and Gubala-Ryzak, M.1992: Learnability and grammar reorganization in L2A: against negative evidence causing the unlearning of verb movement. Second Language Research8,1-38.
45.
Wang, W.S.-Y., editor, 1977: The lexicon in phonological change. The Hague: Mouton.
46.
Wexler, K. and Manzini, R.1987: Parameters and learnability in binding theory. In Roeper, T. and Williams, E., editors, Parameter setting. Dordrecht: Reidel, 41-76.
47.
White, L.1991: Adverb placement in second language acquisition: some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research7, 133—61.
48.
— 1992: On triggering data in L2 acquisition: a reply to Schwartz and Gubala-Ryzak. Second Language Research8, 120—37.
49.
Young-Scholten, M.1992: The Subset Principle in interlanguage phonology: a preliminary investigation. In Leather, J. and James, A., editors, New sounds 92. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, 200-17.
50.
Youssef, A. and Mazurkewich, I.1993: The acquisition of English metrical parameters and syllable structure by adult native speakers of Egyptian Arabic (Cairene dialect). Paper presented at the MIT Workshop on Advances in Second Language Acquisition, Cambridge, MA, January.
