This article reconsiders one of the classic articles in the second language literature, Schachter's 'An error in error analysis', in the light of subsequent work on avoidance. Such work is essentially of two kinds, either building on and refining the concept of avoidance, or offering alternative explanations for Schachter's findings. While avoidance as a genuine phenomenon is not proved or disproved by Schachter's data, hypotheses based on her figures suffer from the lack of methodological detail in her original study. In order to be able to establish whether avoidance is a feasible explanation for relative underproduction by a group of learners, it is necessary to look at the first language form, distribution and function of the entity supposedly being avoided in the L2 as well as the means being used to establish whether and to what extent the entity is already part of the L2 knowledge of members of that group.
Bley-Vroman, R. and Houng, C.1988: Why do Chinese use few relative clauses in English ? University of Hawai'i Working Papers in ESL7, 93-98.
3.
Chiang, D.1980: Predictors of relative clause production. In Scarcella, R. and Krashen, S., editors, Research in second language acquisition , Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 142-45.
4.
Corder, S.P.1973: The elicitation of interlanguage. In Svartvik, J., editor, Errata, Lund: CWK Gleerup, 36-47.
5.
Dagut, M. and Laufer, B.1985: Avoidance of phrasal verbs - a case for contrastive analysis . Studies in Second Language Acquisition7, 73-80.
6.
Doughty, C.1991: Second language instruction does make a difference: evidence from an empirical study of SL relativisation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition13, 431-70.
7.
Dulay, H., Burt, M. and Krashen, S.1982: Language two. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
Eckman, F.1977: Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis . Language Learning27, 315-30.
9.
— 1985: The markedness differential hypothesis; theory and applications . In Wheatley, B., Hastings, A., Eckman, F., Bell, L., Krukar, G. and Rutkowski, R., editors, Current approaches to second language acquisition , Bloomington : Indiana University Linguistics Club, 3-21.
10.
Ellis, R.1985: Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
Faerch, C. and Kasper, G.1980: Processes and strategies in foreign language learning and communication. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin5: 47-118.
12.
Fitzgerald, F. Scott1925: The great Gatsby. New York: Charles Scribners Sons.
13.
Gass, S.1979: Language transfer and universal grammatical relations . Language Learning29, 327-44.
14.
— 1980: An investigation of syntactic transfer in adult L2 learners . In Scarcella, R. and Krashen, S., editors, Research in second language acquisition, Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 132-41.
15.
— 1982: From theory to practice. In Hines, M. and Rutherford, W., editors, On TESOL '81, Washington, DC: TESOL, 129-39.
16.
Haas, M.1951: Interlingual word taboos. American Anthropologist53, 338-44.
17.
Hansen-Strain, L. and Strain, J.1989: Variation in the relative clause of Japanese learners . JALT Journal11, 211-33.
18.
Hashimoto, F.1974: Japanese translation of The great Gatsby. Tokyo: Hayakawa Shoboo.
19.
Hulstijn, J. and Marchena, E.1989: Avoidance: grammatical or semantic causes?Studies in Second Language Acquisition11, 241-55.
20.
Hyltenstam, K.1984: The use of typological markedness conditions as predictors in second language acquisition: the case of pronominal copies in relative clauses. In Andersen, R., editor, Second languages: a crosslinguistic perspective, Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 39-60.
21.
Inui, R.1974: Kokugo no hyoogen ni oyoboshita eigo no eikyo (The influence of English on expressions in Japanese). In Bunkacho, editor, Fukkoku bunkachoo kokugo series: gaikokugo to Nihongo (Reprint of Bunkachoo's national language series: foreign languages and Japanese), Tokyo: Kyooiku Shuppan .
22.
Keenan, E. and Comrie, B.1977: Noun phrase accessability and universal grammar . Linguistic Inquiry8, 63-99.
23.
Kellerman, E.1978: Giving learners a break: native language intuitions as a source of predictions about transferability. Working Papers onBilingualism15, 59-92.
24.
— 1979: The problem with difficulty. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin4, 27-48.
25.
Kleinmann, E.1977: Avoidance behaviour in adult second language acquisition . Language Learning27, 93-107.
26.
— 1978: The strategy of avoidance in second language acquisition . In Ritchie, W., editor, Second language acquisition research: issues and implications, New York: Academic Press, 157-44.
27.
Kuno, S.1973: The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
28.
— 1974: The position of relative clauses and conjunctions . Linguistic Inquiry5, 117-36.
29.
Lado, R.1957: Linguistics across cultures. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press.
30.
— 1961: Language testing: the construction and use of foreign language tests. London: Longman .
31.
Larsen-Freeman, D. and Long, M.1991: An introduction to second language acquisition research . London: Longman.
32.
Laufer, B. and Eliasson, S.1991: What causes avoidance in L2 learning: difference from L2, similarity to L2, or complexity of L2? Paper given at the First EUROSLA Conference, Salzburg, September.
33.
Long, M. and Sato, C.1984: Methodological issues in interlanguage studies: an interactionist perspective. In Davies, A., Criper, C. and Howatt, A. , editors, Interlanguage, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 253-79.
34.
Martin, S.1975: A reference grammar of Japanese. New Haven: Yale University Press.
35.
Matsumoto, Y. and Matsumoto, I.1982: Ima sugu yaku datsu honyaku 84 no kotsu: eiwa honyaku no kiso chishiki (84 translation techniques that work right away: fundamentals of English-to-Japanese translation). Tokyo: Babel Press.
36.
Miura, A.1978: Words in context. Tokyo: Taishukan Publishing Co. (Translation of Suzuki, T., 1973: Kotoba to Bunka, Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.)
37.
Nozaki, T.1974: Japanese translation of The great Gatsby. Tokyo: Shinchosha
38.
Odlin, T.1989: Language transfer: cross-linguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Oonuki, S.1957: Japanese translation of The great Gatsby. Tokyo: Kadokawa Shoten.
40.
Pavesi, M.1986: Markedness, discoursal modes and relative clause formation in a formal and an informal context. Studies in Second Language Acquisition8, 38-55.
41.
Saunders, N.1986: Relative clause development in Japanese English . JAL T Journal7, 171-87.
42.
Schachter, J.1974: An error in error analysis. Language learning24, 205-14.
43.
1979: Reflections on error production. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin4, 15-26.
44.
1992 : Personal communication.
45.
Seliger, H.1989: Semantic constraints on the production of the English passive by Hebrew-English bilinguals. In Dechert, H. and Raupach, M., editors, Transfer in language production, Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 21-33.
46.
Suzuki, T.1973: Kotoba to bunka. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
47.
Zhao, R.1989: A discourse analysis of relative clauses in Chinese and English: an error in 'An error in error analysis'. IDEAL4, 105-17.
