This article considers the issue of transferability, a well-known concept in the SLA literature but not one so frequently investigated in language contact research. Three principles can help to identify effects of transferability in language contact: similar distributional range in L1 and L2; multiple geographic occurrences; and high likelihood in certain geographic areas. The article shows the applicability of the principles to language contact in the British Isles (especially Ireland) with a detailed discussion of absolute constructions, structures which show interesting relations between syntax and discourse, and which also seem susceptible to crosslinguistic influence. Although counterarguments are possible to make, they do not account for the known facts. Moreover, the evidence for the transferability of absolutes in Hiberno-English strengthens the case for crosslinguistic influence in a totally different language contact situation, the Indian subcontinent. The most general conclusion to be drawn from the discussion is that SLA research and language contact studies can be mutually enriching. The former can provide principles to establish the likelihood of transfer of particular structures, while the latter can expand the range of data that will contribute to a sound theory of transferability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adjemian, C.1983: The transferability of lexical properties. In Gass, S. and Selinker, L. , editors, Language transfer in language learning , Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 250-68.
2.
Andersen, R.1977: The impoverished state of cross-sectional morpheme acquisition/accuracy methodology (Or: The leftovers are more nourishing than the main course). Presented at the Second Language Research Forum, Los Angeles: Department of English, University of California at Los Angeles. ERIC ED 146780.
3.
— editor, 1983: Pidginization and creolization as language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
4.
Berent, G.1975: English absolutes in functional perspective. In Grossman, R., San, L. and Vance, T., editors, Papers from the parasession on functionalism, Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 10-23.
5.
Bickerton, D.1986: Creoles and West African languages: a case of mistaken identity? In Muysken, P. and Smith, N., editors, Substrata versus universals in creole genesis, Amsterdam: Benjamins , 25-40.
6.
Bliss, A.1976: The English language in Ireland. Dublin : The Gaelic League.
7.
— 1977: The emergence of modern English dialects in Ireland . In O'Muirithe, D., editor, The English language in Ireland, Dublin: Mercier Press, 7-19.
8.
— 1978: Spoken English in Ireland, 1600-1740. Dublin: Dolmen Press.
9.
— 1984: English in the south of Ireland. In Trudgill, P., editor, Language in the British Isles, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 135-51.
10.
Boyle, D.1973: ACH and AGUS as coordinate and subordinate conjunctions in Gaelic. You take the high node and I'll take the low node: papers from the Comparative Syntax Festival. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 220-28.
11.
Braidwood, J.1964: Ulster and Elizabethan English. Ulster dialects: an introductory symposium. Holywood, Northern Ireland: Ulster Folk Museum.
12.
Curme, G.1931: Syntax. Boston: D.C. Heath.
13.
Davison, A.1981: Syntactic and semantic indeterminacy resolved: a mostly pragmatic analysis for the Hindi conjunctive participle. In Cole, P., editor, Radical pragmatics , New York: Academic Press, 101-28.
14.
Dechert, H. and Raupach, M., editors, 1989: Transfer in language production . Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
15.
Dulay, H. and Burt, M.1974: Natural sequences in child second language acquisition . Language Learning24, 37-53.
16.
Dulay, H., Burt, M. and Krashen, S.1982: Language two. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
Durkacz, V.1983: The decline of the Celtic languages. Edinburgh: John Donald.
18.
Emeneau, M.1980: Language and linguistic area. Stanford : Stanford University Press.
19.
Filppula, M.1986: Some aspects of Hiberno-English in a functional sentence perspective. Joensuu, Finland: Joensuu Publications in the Humanities.
20.
— 1991a: Subordinating and in Hiberno-English: Irish or English origin? In Ureland, P. and Broderick, G., editors, Language contact in the British Isles, Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 617-31.
21.
— 1991b: Urban and rural varieties of Hiberno-English. In Cheshire, J., editor, English around the world: sociolinguistic perspectives, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 51-60.
22.
Fitzgerald, G.1984: Estimates for baronies of minimum level of Irish-speaking amongst successive decennial cohorts: 1771-1781 to 1861-1871. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy84/C3, 117-55.
23.
Gass, S.1979: Language transfer and universal grammatical relations . Language Learning29, 327-44.
24.
— 1983: Second language acquisition and language universals . In DiPietro, R., Frawley, W. and Wedel, A., editors, The First Delaware Symposium on Language Studies, Newark, DE: University of Delaware Press, 249-60.
25.
Gass, S. and Selinker, L. , editors, 1983: Language transfer in language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House .
26.
Givón, T.1990: Syntax: a functional/typological introduction, Volume 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
27.
Greenbaum, S. and Quirk, R.1990: A student's grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
28.
Hagström, B.1985: The development of insular Scandinavian languages as national languages. In Ureland, P.S., editor, Entstehung von Sprachen und Völkern: Glotto- und ethnogenetische Aspekte europäischer Sprachen, Tübingen: Max Niemeyer , 181-92.
29.
Harris, J.1984: Syntactic variation and dialectic divergence. Journal of Linguistics20, 303-27.
30.
— 1986: Expanding the superstrate: habitual aspect markers in Atlantic Englishes. English World-Wide7, 171-99.
31.
Henry, P.L.1957: An Anglo-English dialect of NorthRoscommon. Dublin: Department of English, University College.
32.
Hock, H.1984: (Pre-)Rig-Vedic convergence of Indo-Aryan with Dravidian ? Another look at the evidence. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences14, 89-108.
33.
— 1986: Principles of historical linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
34.
Holm, J.1989: Pidgins and creoles. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
35.
Huebner, T.1979: Order-of-acquisition versus dynamic paradigm: a comparison of method in interlanguage research. TESOL Quarterly13, 21-28.
36.
— 1983: A longitudinal analysis of the acquisition of English . Ann Arbor: Karoma.
37.
Huffines, M.1986: Strategies of language maintenance and ethnic marking among the Pennsylvania Germans. Language Sciences6, 1-16.
38.
Hyltenstam, K.1984: The use of typological markedness conditions as predictors in second language acquisition. In Andersen, R., editor, Second languages: a cross-linguistic perspective , Rowley MA: Newbury House, 39-58.
39.
Jesperson, O.1949: A Modern English grammar on historical principles . London: Allen and Unwin.
40.
Jordens, P.1977: Rules, grammatical intuitions, and strategies in foreign language learning. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin2: 5-76.
41.
Joyce, P.W.1910/1988: English as we speak it in Ireland . Dublin: Wolf-hound Press.
42.
Jungemann, F.1952: The substratum theory and the Hispano-Romance and Gascon dialects: a functional-structural analysis of some phonological problems. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, ColumbiaUniversity.
43.
Kallen, J.1990: The Hiberno-English perfect: grammaticalisation revisited . Irish University Review20, 120-36.
44.
Kellerman, E.1977: Towards a characterisation of the strategy of transfer in second language learning. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin2, 58-145.
45.
— 1978: Giving learners a break: native language intuitions as a source of predictions about transferability. Working Papers in Bilingualism15, 59-92.
46.
— 1983: Now you see it, now you don't. In Gass, S. and Selinker, L. , editors, Language transfer in language learning, Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 112-34.
47.
— 1984: The empirical evidence for the influence of L1 on interlanguage . In Davies, A., Criper, C. and Howatt, A.P.R., editors, Interlanguage, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 98-122.
48.
— 1986: An eye for an eye: crosslinguistic constraints on the development of the L2 lexicon. In Kellerman, E., and Sharwood Smith, M., editors, Crosslinguistic influence in second language acquisition, New York: Pergamon Press, 35-48.
49.
— 1987: Aspects of transferability in second language acquisition . Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Catholic University of Nijmegen.
50.
Kellerman, E. and Sharwood Smith, M., editors, 1986: Crosslinguistic influence in second language acquisition. New York: Pergamon Press.
51.
Kortmann, B.1991: Free adjuncts and absolutes in English. London: Routledge.
52.
Krashen, S.1981: Second language acquisition and second language learning . Oxford: Pergamon Press .
53.
— 1983: Newmark's 'Ignorance Hypothesis' and current second language acquisition and theory. In Gass, S. and Selinker, L., editors, Language transfer in language learning, Rowley MA: Newbury House, 135-53.
54.
Kuiper, F.B.J.1967: The genesis of a linguistic area. Indo-Iranian Journal10, 81-102.
55.
Lado, R.1957: Linguistics across cultures. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press.
56.
Lass, R.1986: 'Irish influence': reflections on 'standard' English and its opposites, and the identification of calques. Studia Anglia Posnaniensia18, 81-87.
57.
— 1987: The shape of English: structure and history. London: Dent & Sons.
58.
— 1990: Early mainland residues in southern Hiberno-English . Irish University Review20, 137-48.
59.
Lass, R. and Wright, S.1986: Endogeny vs. contact: 'Afrikaans influence' on South African English. English World-Wide7, 201-23.
60.
Li, C.1984: From verb-medial analytic language to verb-final synthetic language: a case of typological change. In Brugman, C. Macaulay, M., Dahlstrom, A., Emantian, M., Moonwoman , B. and O'Connor, C., editors, Proceedings from the tenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 307-23.
61.
Lowenberg, P.1986: Non-native varieties of English: nativization, norms, and implications. Studies in Second Language Acquisition8, 1-18.
62.
Mac Gréine, P.1930: A Longford miscellany. Béaloideas2, 261-73.
63.
Masica, C.1976: Defining a linguistic area: south Asia. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press .
64.
Mesthrie, R. and Dunne, T.1990: Syntactic variation in language shift: the relative clause in South African Indian English. Language Variation and Change2, 31-56.
65.
Mufwene, S.1990: Transfer and the substrate hypothesis in creolistics . Studies in Second Language Acquisition12, 1-23.
66.
Muysken, P. and Smith, N. , editors, 1986: Substrata versus universals in creole genesis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
67.
Odlin, T.1989: Language transfer. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
68.
— 1991a: Irish English idioms and language transfer. English World-Wide12, 175-93.
69.
— 1991b: Toward a definition of 'target language'. Presented at ALMS: Applied Linguistics at Michigan State, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, October 5, 1991.
70.
— 1991c: Syntactic variation in Hiberno-English. In Ureland, P.S. and Broderick, G., editors, Language contact in the British Isles, Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 567-615.
71.
— 1992: A demographic perspective on the shift from Irish to English . In Blackshire-Belay, C., editor, The Germanic mosaic: cultural and linguistic diversity in society, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, in press.
72.
Ó Duilearga, S.1962: Paddy Sherlock's stories. Béaloideas30, 1-75.
73.
Ó Siadhail, M.1984: Agus (ls) / and: a shared syntactic feature. Celtica16, 125-37.
74.
— 1989: Modern Irish: grammatical structure and dialectical variation . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
75.
Poussa, P.1990: A contact-universals origin for periphrastic do, with special consideration for OE-Celtic contact. In Adamson, S., Law, V., Vincent, N. and Wright, S. , editors, Papers from the 5th international conference on English historical linguistics, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 407-34.
76.
Ringbom, H.1987: The role of the mother tongue in foreign language learning. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
77.
Sabban, A.1982: Galisch-Englischer Sprachkontakt. Heidelberg: Julius Groos.
78.
Selinker, L.1972: Interlanguage. IRAL10, 209-31.
79.
Sey, K.A.1973: Ghanian English: an exploratory survey. London: Macmillan.
80.
Shuken, C.1984: Highland and island English. In Trudgill, P., editor, Language in the British Isles, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 144-58.
81.
Silvestri, D.1977: La teoria del sostrato: metodi e miraggi. Naples: Gaetano Macchiaroli.
82.
Singler, J.1988: The homogeneity of the substrate as a factor in pidgin/ creole genesis. Language64, 27-51.
83.
Sjöholm, K.1983: Problems in 'measuring' L2 learning strategies . In Ringbom, H., editor, Psycholinguistics and foreign language learning, Åbo, Finland: Publications of the Research Institute of the Åbo Akademi Foundation, 174-94.
84.
Southworth, F.1971: Detecting prior creolization: an analysis of the historical origins of Marathi. In Hymes, D. , editor, Pidginization and creolization of languages, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 255-73.
85.
1974: Linguistic stratigraphy of North India. International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics3, 201-23.
86.
1990: The reconstruction of prehistoric South Asian language contact. In Bendix, E., editor, The uses of linguistics, New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 207-34.
87.
Sridhar, K. and Sridhar, S.N.1986: Bridging the paradigmgap: second language acquisition theory and indigenized varieties of English. World Englishes5, 3-14.
88.
Sridhar, S.N.1981: Contrastive analysis, error analysis, and interlanguage: three phases of one goal. In Fisiak, J., editor, Contrastive analysis and the language teacher. Oxford: Pergamon.
89.
Sullivan, J.1980: The validity of literary dialect: evidence from the portrayal of Hiberno-English features. Language in Society9, 195-219.
90.
Taniguchi, J.1972: A grammatical analysis of artistic representation of Irish English. Tokyo: Shinozaki Shorin .
91.
Thomason, S. and Kaufman, T.1988: Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics . Berkeley: University of California Press.
92.
Thompson, S. and Longacre, R.1985: Adverbial clauses. In Shopen, T., editor, Language typology and syntactic description , Volume 2, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 171-234.
93.
Tikkanen, B.1987: The Sanskrit gerund: a synchronic, diachronic, and typological analysis. Studia Orientalia62, 1-378.
94.
Todd, L.1989: Cultures in conflict: varieties of English in Northern Ireland. In Garcia, O. and Otheguy, R., editors, English across cultures, cultures across English, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 335-55.
95.
Trautmann, T.1979: The study of Dravidian kinship. In Deshpande, M. and Hook, P. , editors, Aryan and non-Aryan in India, Ann Arbor : Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies , The University of Michigan, 153-73.
96.
Van der Haagen, M.1990: The influence of American English on the English pronunciation of Dutch learners of English. Paper presented at AILA Congress, Thessaloniki, Greece .
97.
Vermeer, H.1969: Untersuchungen zum Bau Zentral-Süd-Asiatischer Sprachen . Heidelberg: Julius Groos .
98.
Visser, F.T.1973: An historical syntax of the English language. Leiden: Brill.
99.
White, L.1989: Universal Grammar in second language acquisition . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
100.
Winter, W.1989: On a new claim concerning substratum influence upon Tokharian . Central Asiatic Journal33, 126-32.
101.
Winters, C.A.1988: The Dravidian and Manding substratum in Tokharian . Central Asiatic Journal32, 131-41.
102.
Wright, J., editor, 1898: English dialect dictionary. London: Oxford University Press.
