Much current work on L2 acquisition is defined by the hypothesis that adult learners embark on the acquisition task with a language faculty whose structure is significantly less modular that than of the L1 learner. The domain-specific system, which has available to it the principles and conditions of Universal Grammar, has been replaced by content-neutral, central processes and the learner's L1 as the principal means by which an L2 can be internalized. An important corollary of this hypothesis is that acquisition will be piecemeal and will not evidence the effects associated with parameter setting.
In this paper we attempt to demonstrate that adult L2 acquisition is module - and parameter-sensitive. The focus of the inquiry falls on the acquisition of the principle of structural government and the English language value of the agreement parameter by Japanese-speaking learners. Although the data supporting the claim come primarily from production, their analyses furnish compelling evidence that central processing, as it is currently understood, cannot account for the way attributes of these parametric choices cohere together.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bialystok, E.1981. The role of linguistic knowledge in second language use . Studies in Second Language Acquisition4, 31-45.
2.
Bley-Vroman, R.1989. The logical problem of foreign language acquisition. In Gass, S. and J. Schachter, editors, Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Burzio, L.1986. Intransitive verbs and auxiliaries. Italian syntax: a government-binding approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.
4.
Chomsky, N.1986. Barriers. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
5.
— 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
6.
Clahsen, H. and Muysken P.1988. The UG paradox in L2 acquisition. Unpublished paper, University of Düsseldorf andUniversity of Amsterdam.
7.
— 1986. The availability of universal grammar to adult and child learners: a study of the acquisition of German word order. Second Language Research2, 93-119.
8.
Cole, P.1987. Null objects in universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry18, 597-612.
9.
Coppieters, R.1987. Competence differences between native and non-native speakers . Language63, 544-78.
10.
Davidson, A.1984. Syntactic markedness and the definition of sentence topics . Language60, 797-846.
11.
Farmer, A.1984. Modularity in syntax: a study of Japanese and English . Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press .
12.
Flynn, S.1987. Contrast and construction in a theory of second language acquisition. Language Learning36, 1-37.
13.
Fodor, J.1983. The modularity of mind. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
14.
Hilles, S.1986. Interlanguages and the pro-drop parameter. Second Language Research2, 33-52.
15.
Hornstein, N.A. and Weinberg1981. Case theory and preposition stranding. Linguistic Inquiry12, 55-91.
16.
Huang, J.1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry15, 531-74.
17.
Hyams, N.1987. The setting of the null subject parameter: a reanalysis . Paper presented at the 12th Boston University Language Development Conference, Boston, October.
18.
— 1986. Language acquisition and the theory of parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel.
19.
Keyser, J. and Roeper, T.1984. On the middle and ergative constructions in English. Linguistic Inquiry15, 381-416.
20.
Li, C. and Thompson, S.1976. Subject and topic: a new typology. In Li, C., editor, Subject and topic, 457-89. New York: Academic Press.
21.
Liceras, J.M.1988. Syntax and stylistics: more on the pro-drop parameter . In Pankhurst, J., Sharwood Smith, M. and Van Buren, P., editors, Learnability and second languages, 71-93. Dordrecht : Foris.
22.
Liceras, J.M.1986. Linguistic theory and second language acquisition. Tubingen: Gunter Narr.
23.
Lust, B.1988. Universal grammar in second language acquisition: promises and problems in critically relating theory and empirical studies. In Flynn, S. and O'Neil, W., editors, Linguistic theory in second language acquisition, 309-328. Dordrecht: Kluwer .
24.
Patkowski, M.1980. The sensitive period for the acquisition of syntax in a second language. Language Learning30, 449-72.
25.
Phinney, M.1987. The pro-drop parameter in second language acquisition . In Roeper, T. and Williams E., editors, Parameter setting, 221-38. Dordrecht : Reidel.
26.
Platt, E.1989. Assessing the viability of a parameter-setting model for second language acquisition. A study of adult Spanish and Vietnamese learners of English. Paper presented at the 18th Annual UWM Linguistics Symposium, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee , April 21-22.
27.
Pollock, J.-Y.1989. Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry20, 365-424.
28.
Rizzi, L.1982. Negation, Wh-movement and the null subject parameter. In Issues in Italian syntax, 117-184. Dordrecht: Foris.
29.
Rutherford, W.1983. Language typology and language transfer. In Gass, S. and Selinker, L. editors, Language transfer in language learning, 358-70. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury.
30.
Safir, K.1987. Comments on Wexler and Manzini. In Roeper, T. and Williams, E., editors, Parameter setting, 77-89. Dordrecht: Reidel.
31.
Saito, M.1985. Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications. Unpublished Ph D thesis, MIT.
32.
Schachter, J.1988a. Second language acquisition and its relationship to universal grammar. Applied Linguistics9, 219-35.
33.
— 1988b. On the issue of completeness in second language acquisition . Paper presented at the 13th Boston University Language Development Conference, Boston, October 21-23.
34.
Schachter, J. and Rutherford, W.1979. Discourse function and language transfer. Working Papers onBilingualism19, 1-12.
35.
Sharwood Smith, M.1986. Comprehension versus acquisition: two ways of processing input. Applied Linguistics7, 239-56.
36.
Smyth, R.1988. Contextual motivation and working memory. Canadian Journal of Linguistics33, 231-250.
37.
Stowell, T.1981. Origins of phrase structure. Unpublished Ph D thesis, MIT.
38.
Thompson, 1978. Modern English from a typological point of view. Linguistische Berichte54, 19-35.
39.
Wexler, K. and Manzini, R.1987. Parameters and learnability in binding theory. In Roeper, T. and Williams, E. editors, Parameter setting, 41-76. Dordrecht : Reidel.
40.
White, L.1987. Implications of learnability theories for second language learning and teaching. Paper presented at the 8th AILA Congress, University of Sydney, August.
41.
Williams, E.1984. Grammatical relations. Linguistic Inquiry15, 639-73.
42.
Yip, V.1989. There are Chinese existential constructions which cause learnability problems. Paper presented at the 1989 Language Acquisition Research Symposium, University of Utrecht, August 22-25.
43.
Zobl, H.1989a. Modularity in adult L2 acquisition. Language Learning39.
44.
— 1989b. Canonical typological structures and ergativity in English L2 acquisition. In Gass, S. and Schachter, J. editors, Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition, 203-21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
— 1988. Configurationality and the subset principle. In Pankhurst, J., Sharwood Smith, M. and Van Buren, P., editors, Learnability and second languages, 116-131. Dordrecht: Foris.
