We suggest a combined research methodology for studying SLA in real-life and important contexts, a methodology sensitive to the demands of such contexts. For studying IL learning in context, our suggested methodology combines and integrates aspects from three fields: grounded ethnography in ethnomethodol ogy ; subject-specialist informant procedures in language for specific purposes; and rhetorical/grammatical strategies in discourse analysis. We first present evidence for the importance of devising a research approach to contexually based SLA. Then we sketch the suggested research methodology and present two extended case studies which illustrate the methodology. We view such research as complimentary to universal approaches to core IL grammar. Finally, we sketch our theoretical approach, showing a possible link between research in universal and contextually-based SLA.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Agar, M.1980: The professional stranger: an informal introduction to ethnography. New York: Academic Press.
2.
Apostel, L.1977: The cognitive point of view: introduction to a discussion . In De Mey, M. et al., editors, International workshop on the cognitive view, Ghent: University of Ghent.
3.
Ausubel, D.1968: Educational psychology: a cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
4.
Becker, A.L.1988a: Language in particular: a lecture. In Tannen, D., editor, Linguistics in context (Lectures from the 1985 LSA/TESOL and NEH Institutes, Volume XXIX in the series, Advances in discourse processes. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
5.
1988 b: Emic Burmese-eye-view of the Burmese verb phrase. Paper delivered at the conference on 'The Role of Theory in Language Description'. Ocho Rios, Jamaica.
6.
Beckman, H. and Frankel, R.1984: The effect of physician behavior on the collection of data: Annals of Internal Medicine101, 692-96.
7.
Bley-Vroman, R.1978: Purpose, device and level in rhetorical theory . In Todd Trimble, R.M., Trimble, L.P. and Drobnic, K., editors., English for specific purposes: science and technology, Corvallis: Oregon State University.
8.
Bley-Vroman, R. and Selinker, L.1984: Research design in rhetorical/ grammatical studies: a proposed optimal research strategy. English for Specific PurposesNewsletter82/83, 1-4; and 84; 1-6.
9.
Briggs, S.1987: When course success varies with discourse success . English for Specific Purposes Journal6, 153-56.
10.
Bruner, J.1978: The role of dialogue in language acquisition. In Sinclair, A., Jarvella, R.J. and Levelt, W.J.M., editors, The child's conception of language, Berlin : Springer.
11.
Carpenter, K.L.1983: Sociolinguistic signals of role in university office-hour interactions. Unpublished PhD. dissertation. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan.
12.
Cornu, A.M. and Delahaye, M.1987: Variability in interlanguage reconsidered: LSP vs non-LSP talk. English for Specific Purposes Journal6, 145-52.
13.
Crapanzano, V.1980: Tuhami: potrait of a Moroccan. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
14.
Douglas, D. and Pettinari, C.1983: Psychiatric interview training modules: a program in language and culture for foreign medical graduates. Paper presented at annual TESOL convention, Toronto.
15.
Douglas, D. and Selinker, L.1985: Principles of language tests within the 'discourse domains' theory of interlanguage: research, test construction, and interpretation . Language Testing2, 205-26.
16.
Eisenstein, M.R. and Starbuck, R.J. (in press): The effect of emotional investment on L2 production. In Gass, S., Madden, Preston, D. and Selinker, L., editors, Variation in second language acquisition: psycholinguistic issues. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters .
17.
Erickson, F.1979: Talking down: some cultural sources of miscommunication in interracial interviews. In Wolfgang, A. , editor, Nonverbal behavior, New York : Academic Press.
18.
— 1987/1988: Ethnographic guidelines, call for papers for Ethnography in Education Research Forum. Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania.
19.
Frankel, R.M.1984: From sentence to sequence: understanding the medical encounter through microinteractional analysis. Discourse Processes7, 135-70.
20.
(in press): 'I wz wondering- uhm could RAID uhm effect the brain permenently d'y know?': some observations on the relationship between talk, text, and time in calls to a poison control center. Western Journal of speech communication .
21.
Frankel, R.M. and Beckman, H.1982: IMPACT: an interaction-based method for preserving and analyzing clinical transactions. In Pettigrew L., editor, explorations in provider and patient transactions , Memphis: Humana.
22.
Garfinkle, H.1967: studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
23.
Gumperz, J.J. and Tannen, D.1979: Individual and social differences in language use . In Fillmore, C., Kempler, D. and Wang, W.S-Y., editors, Individual differences in language ability and language behavior , New York: Academic Press.
24.
Huckin, T. and Olsen, L.1984: On the use of information in LSP discourse analysis . In Pugh, A. and Ulijin, J., editors, Reading for professional purposes. London: Heinemann.
25.
Klein, W. Editor (in progress): Preliminary reports of the European Scientific Foundation project. SLA by Adult Immigrants. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute.
26.
Labov, J.1988: Assessing what a second language learner knows through student-teacher interaction. Penn Working Papers in Educational Linguistics , Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania4(2), 1-29.
27.
Lackstrom, J.E., Trimble, L.P. and Selinker, L.1970: Grammar and technical English. In Lugton, R., editor. English as a second language: current issues. Philadelphia: Chilton Press.
Lakshmanan, U.1987: Second language acquisition and LSP. Unpublished ms. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan .
30.
Lakoff, G.1987: Women, fire, and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
Mage, T.1978: Contrastive discourse analysis: EST and SST. In Todd Trimble, R.M., Trimble, L.P. and Drobnic, K., editors, English for specific purposes: science and technology, Corvallis: Oregon State University.
32.
Mage, T.1981: Scientific and technical discourse: a comparative analysis of English and Romanian. In Selinker, L., Tarone E. and Hanzeli, V. , editors, English for academic and technical purposes: studies in honor of Louis Trimble. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
33.
Master, P., Schumann, J. and Sokolik, M. (in press): The experimental creation of a pidgin language. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages0, 00-00.
34.
Pike, K.L.1957: A training device for translation theory and practice . Bibliotheca Sacra114, 347-62.
35.
Pike, K.L.1964: Discourse analysis and tagmeme matrices. Oceanic Linguistics3, 5-25.
36.
Pike, K.L. and Gordon, K.H.1972: Preliminary technology to show emic relations between non-transitivity clause structures in Dhangar (Kudux, Nepal). International Journal of DravidianLinguistics1, 56-79.
37.
Pike, K.L. and Pike, E.G.1972: Seven substitution exercises for studying the structure of discourse. Linguistics, 94, 43-52.
38.
Preston, D. (in press): Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
39.
Robillard, D.1977: Issues in evaluation and performance in pediatric residency training. Unpublished ms. Lansing: Michigan State University.
40.
Rutherford, W. and Sharwood Smith, M.1987: Readings in pedagogical Grammar. New York: Newbury House .
41.
Sachs, H., Schegloff, M. and Jefferson, G.1974: A simplest systemics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language50, 696-735.
42.
Schumann, J.1988: Lectures delivered in a course entitled: pidgins, creoles and early interlanguages. TESOL summer institute , Flagstaff.
43.
Selinker, L.1972: Interlanguage. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 10, 209-31.
44.
— 1979: On the use of informants in discourse analysis and 'language for specific purposes'. International Journal of Applied Linguistics . 17, 189-215.
45.
— 1988: Using research methods in LSP: two approaches to applied discourse analysis. In Tickoo, M.K., editor, ESP: State of the art. Anthology Series 21, Singapore: Regional Language Centre.
46.
—(Forthcoming): Reframing interlanguage.
47.
Selinker, L. and Douglas, D.1985: Wrestling with 'context' in interlanguage theory . Applied Linguistics6, 190-204.
48.
1987a: LSP and interlanguage: some empirical studies. English for Specific Purposes Journal6, 75-86.
49.
— 1987b: The problem of comparing 'episodes' in discourse domains in interlanguage studies. ESCOL '86: Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics.
50.
—(Forthcoming): Interlanguage analysis in context.
51.
Selinker, L., Todd Trimble, R.M. and Trimble, L.P.1976: Presuppositional rhetorical information in EST discourse . TESOL Quarterly10, 281-90.
52.
— 1978: Rhetorical function shifts in EST discourse. TESOL Quarterly12, 311-20.
53.
Sharwood Smith, M.1987: Notions and functions in a contrastive pedagogical grammar . In Rutherford, W. and Sharwood Smith, M., editors, Readings in pedagogical grammar, New York: Newbury House .
54.
Skelton, J. and Pindi, M.1987: Acquiring a new context: Zairean students struggle with the academic mode. English for Specific Purposes Journal6, 121-32.
55.
St. John, M.J.1987: Writing processes of Spanish Scientists publishing in English. English for Specific Purposes Journal6, 113-20.
56.
Sugimoto, E.1978: Contrastaive analysis of English and Japanese technical rhetoric. In Todd Trimble, R.M., Trimble, L.P. and Drobnic, K., editors, English for specific purposes: science and technology, Corvallis: Oregon State University.
57.
Swales, J.1985: A genre-based approach to language across the curriculum . In Tickoo, M.L., editor, Language across the curriculum. Anthology Series 15, Singapore : Regional Language Centre.
58.
— 1986: Current developments and future prospects. In Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, Volume 7, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59.
Tarone, E., Dwyer, S., Gillette, S. and Icke, V.1981: On the use of the passive in two astrophysics papers . English for Specific Purposes Journal1, 123-30.
60.
Tyma, D.1981: Anaphoric functions of some demonstrative noun phrases in EST. In Selinker, L. Tarone, E. and Hanzeli, V., editors, English for academic and technical purposes: studies in honor of Louis Trimble, Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
61.
Vlatkovic, M.1971-72: On the use of tenses in scientific papers, English and Croatian. Studia Romanica et Anglica33-36.
62.
Watanabe, N.1982: A study of English-Japanese interlanguage. Unpublished ms. Eugene: University of Oregon .
63.
Woken, M.D. and Swales, J. (in press): Expertise and authority in nativenonnative conversations: the need for a variable account. In Gass, S., Madden, C., Preston, D., and Selinker, L., editors, Variation in second language acquisition: discourse and pragmatics , Clevedon: Multilingual Matters .
64.
Zuengler, J. (1989): Identity and interlanguage development and use . Applied Linguistics10, 80-96.
65.
—(in press a): Assessing an interaction-based paradigm: how accommodative should we be? In Eisenstein, M.R., editor, The dynamic interlanguage ; empirical studies in second language variation, New York: Plenum.
66.
(in press b): Performance variation in NS-NNS interactions: ethnolinguistic difference or discourse domain? In Gass, S., Madden, C., Preston D. and Selinker, L., editors, Variation in second language acquisition: discourse and pragmatics, Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
