Anderson, J.R.1983: The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
2.
Bley-Vroman, R. in press: The logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic Analysis.
3.
Chomsky, N.1975: Reflections on language. New York: Pantheon.
4.
— 1980: Rules and representations. New York : Columbia University Press.
5.
— 1986: Knowledge of language: its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.
6.
Fodor, J.A.1983: The modularity of mind. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
7.
Fodor, J.A., Bever, T.G. and Garrett, M.F.1974: The psychology of language: an introduction to psycholinguistics and generative grammar. New York: McGraw-Hill.
8.
Gregg, K.R.1984: Krashen's Monitor and Occam's Razor. Applied Linguistics5: 79-100.
9.
— 1986: Review of Krashen 1985. TESOL Quarterly20: 116-22.
10.
—in press: Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition: what could they be, and where can we get some? In Gass, S.M. and Schachter, J., editors, Second language acquisition: a linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Krashen, S.D.1983: Newmark's 'ignorance hypothesis' and current second language acquisition theory. In Gass, S.M. and Selinker, L., editors, Language transfer in language learning. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
12.
— 1985: The input hypothesis: issues and implications. London: Longman.
13.
McLaughlin, B.1978: The monitor model: some methodological considerations . Language Learning28: 309-32.
14.
Pinker, S.1979: Formal models of language learning. Cognition7: 217-83.
15.
— 1984: Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press .
16.
Pylyshyn, Z.1980: Computation and cognition: issues in the foundations of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences3: 111-32.
17.
Schwartz, B.D.1986: The epistemological status of second language acquisition . Second Language Research2: 120-59.
18.
White, L.1987: Against comprehensible input: the input hypothesis and the development of L2 competence. Applied Linguistics8: 95-110.
