This article discusses the acquisition of the prosodic characteristics of a second language in the light of the development of a target language phonological grammar. Prosodic characteristics are conventionally taken to refer to the intonation and accent patterns in a phonological system. However, nonlinear theories of phonology view the pitch and stress values of a language as defining a separate representation or component in a phonological grammar, i.e. the prosodic structure. A 'metrical' type model of prosodic structure is presented, in which the structural layers of a phonological hierarchy are characterized by the occurrence of particular contrastive (paradigmatic) features and particular phonetic (syntagmatic) effects at each unit-level. The course of acquisition of the prosodic structure of a second language is then shown to be describable in terms of the gradual development of target language values per unit-level of the hierarchy. Data from the L2 English of two L 1 Dutch speakers are examined by way of illustrating some of the claims of the model.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, J. and Durand, J.1986: Dependency phonology. In: Durand, J., editor, Dependency and nonlinear phonology, London: Croom Helm, 1-54.
2.
Backman, N.1979: Intonation errors in second language pronunciation of eight Spanish speaking adults. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin4: 239-66.
3.
Brown, G.1977: Listening to spoken English. London : Longman.
4.
Brown, G., Currie, K. and Kenworthy, J.1980: Questions of intonation. London: Croom Helm.
5.
Chomsky, N.1982: Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
6.
Collins, B. and Mees, I.1981: The sounds of English and Dutch. Leiden : Leiden University Press.
7.
Cooper, F.1983: Some reflections on speech research. In: MacNeilage, P., editor, The production of speech, New York: Springer, 275-90.
8.
Cruttenden, A.1981: Falls and rises: meanings and universals. Journal of Linguistics17:77-91.
9.
Crystal, D.1982: Profiling linguistic disability. London : Edward Arnold.
10.
— 1986: Prosodic development. In: Fletcher, P. and Garman, M., editors, Language acquisition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 174-97.
11.
Donegan, P. and Stampe, D.1979: The study of natural phonology. In: Dinnsen, D., editor, Current approaches to phonological theory, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 126-73.
12.
Erdmann, P.1973: Patterns of stress-transfer in English and German. International Review of Applied Linguistics11: 229-41.
13.
Firth, J.1948: Sounds and prosodies. Transactions of the Philological Society, 127-52.
14.
Giegerich, H.1985: Metrical phonology and phonological structure: German and English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Gimson, A.1975: A practical course of English pronunciation. London: Edward Arnold.
16.
— 1980: An introduction to the pronunciation of English. Third edition. London: Edward Arnold.
17.
Grosser, W.1983: Interferenz in der Prosodie: Oberösterreichisch-Englisch . In: James, A. and Kettemann, B., editors, Dialektphonologie und Fremdsprachenerwerb/Dialect phonology and foreign language acquisition, Tübingen: Narr, 235-52.
18.
Gussenhoven, C.1983: A semantic analysis of the nuclear tones of English. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
19.
— 1985: Intonation: a whole autosegmental language. In: Van der Hulst, H. and Smith, N., editors, Advances in nonlinear phonology, Dordrecht: Foris, 117-31.
20.
Gussenhoven, C. and Broeders, A.1976: The pronunciation of English. Groningen : Wolters-Noordhoff-Longman .
21.
Halliday, M.1967: Intonation and grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton.
22.
Hayes, B.1981: A metrical theory of stress rules. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
23.
— 1984: The phonology of rhythm in English. Linguistic Inquiry15: 33-74.
24.
Henderson, E.1949: Prosodies in Siamese. Asia Major (New Series)1: 189-215.
25.
James, A.1976: Dialektaler Transfer in der Prosodie. Linguistik und Didaktik28:261-72.
26.
— 1981a: Defining the suprasegmental context of second language pronunciation variation. In: James, A. and Westney, P., editors, New linguistic impulses in foreign language teaching, Tübingen: Narr, 55-69.
27.
— 1981b: Phonological idioms in second language pronunciation performance. Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen9: 119-26.
28.
— 1986: Suprasegmental phonology and segmental form. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
29.
— 1987: The acquisition of phonological representation: a modular approach. In: James, A. and Leather, J., editors, Sound patterns in second language acquisition, Dordrecht: Foris, 225-49.
30.
—in press: The acquisition of a second language phonology. Tübingen: Narr.
31.
Jones, D.1956: The pronunciation of English. Fourth edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Karpf, A., Kettemann, B. and Viereck, W.1980: Phonology of dialect interference in second language learning . International Review of Applied Linguistics18: 193-208.
33.
Ladd, D.1983: Phonological features of intonational peaks. Language59: 721-59.
34.
Leben, W.1976: The tones of English intonation. Linguistic Analysis2: 67-103.
35.
Liberman, M. and Prince, A.1977: On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry8: 249-336.
36.
Macken, M.1979: Developmental reorganization of phonology: a hierarchy of basic units of acquisition. Lingua49: 11-49.
37.
Nespor, M. and Vogel, I.1986: Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
38.
O'Connor, J.1967: Better English pronunciation. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
39.
Peters, A.1983: The units of language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Pierrehumbert, J.1980: The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Unpublished PhD dissertation, MIT.
41.
Pike, K.1967: Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior. The Hague: Mouton .
42.
Prince, A.1983: Relating to the grid. Linguistic Inquiry14: 19-100.
43.
Roach, P.1983: English phonetics and phonology. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
44.
Schane, S.1979: The rhythmic nature of English word-accentuation. Language55, 559-602.
45.
Selkirk, E.1978: On prosodic structure and its relation to syntactic structure . Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
46.
— 1980: The role of prosodic categories in English word stress . Linguistic Inquiry11: 563-605.
47.
— 1984: Phonology and syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.
48.
Tench, P.1976: Double ranks in a phonological hierarchy. Journal of Linguistics12: 1-20.
49.
Trubetzkoy, N.1939: Grundzüge der Phonologie. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 7. Repr. 1958. Göttingen: Vandenhoek and Ruprecht.
50.
Van Buuren, L.1978: Phonological hierarchy in English. In: Zonneveld, W., editor, Linguistics in the Netherlands 1974-1976, Lisse: de Ridder, 70-80.
51.
— 1980a: Generative phonetic rules for English (RP). English Institute Journal3: 3-10.
52.
— 1980b: On Dutch intonation. In: Daalder, S. and Gerritsen, M., editors, Linguistics in the Netherlands1980, Amsterdam : North-Holland, 1-9.
53.
— 1985: A theory of English intonation, ms., Department of English, University of Amsterdam.
54.
—to appear: Margaret Thatcher's pronunciation: an exercise in ear-training . Journal of the International Phonetic Association.
55.
Van der Hulst, H. and Smith, N.1985: The framework of nonlinear generative phonology. In: Van der Hulst, H. and Smith, N., editors, Advances in nonlinear phonology, Dordrecht: Foris, 3-55.
