Studies on cross-linguistic influence (CLI) in third language (L3) acquisition of morphosyntax have predominantly used offline tasks to determine which language(s) constitute the source of CLI. Yet, they provide little evidence about incremental processing of morphosyntactic features that are similar to participants’ first language (L1) and/or second language (L2). Therefore, we conducted an eye-tracking study with Polish–English bilinguals (n = 41) who were taught a miniature version of Norwegian in a laboratory setting. Participants were presented with sentences testing adjectival number agreement (a feature present in Polish and Norwegian, but absent in English) and indefinite articles (present in English and Norwegian, but absent in Polish). The results showed a complex pattern of both facilitative and non-facilitative transfer effects from the L1 and the L2, thus providing evidence for property-by-property models of L3 syntax.
AbbasNDeganiTPriorA (2021) Equal opportunity interference: Both L1 and L2 influence L3 morpho-syntactic processing. Frontiers in Psychology12: Article 673535. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.673535
2.
AthanasiadiC (2024) An investigation into L3 acquisition and processing of grammatical aspect in English by bilingual Greek–German children. MA thesis, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
3.
BardelCFalkY (2007) The role of the second language in third language acquisition: The case of Germanic syntax. Second Language Research23: 459–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658307080557
4.
BardelCFalkY (2012) Behind the L2 status factor: A neurolinguistic framework for L3 research. In: CabrelliJFlynnSRothmanJ (eds) Third Language Acquisition in Adulthood. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 61–78.
BatesDMächlerMBolkerBWalkerS (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software67: 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
7.
BogulskiCABiceKKrollJF (2019) Bilingualism as a desirable difficulty: Advantages in word learning depend on regulation of the dominant language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition22(5): 1052–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918000858
8.
BusterudGLohndalTOpsahlTRodinaYWestergaardM (2025) Language change and the loss of feminine gender: Grammatical gender and declension class in the Oslo dialect. Nordic Journal of Linguistics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586525000071
9.
CastleCMJensenINMitrofanovaNWestergaardM (2025a) Investigating crosslinguistic influence (CLI) in L3 morphosyntax through artificial languages. Second Language Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583251332128
10.
CastleCMSkałbaAWestergaardM (2025b) Cross-linguistic influence in L3 acquisition: Investigating the roles of dominance, recency, and property. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.24022.cas
11.
ConklinKPellicer-SánchezACarrolG (2018) Eye-tracking: A guide for applied linguistics research. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
EllisNCHafeezKMartinKI, et al. (2012) An eye-tracking study of learned attention in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics35(3): 547–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716412000501
16.
EllisNCSagarraN (2010) Learned attention effects in L2 temporal reference: The first hour and the next eight semesters. Language Learning60: 85–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00602.x
17.
EllisNCSagarraN (2011) Learned attention in adult language acquisition: A replication and generalization study and meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition33: 589–624. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263111000325
EllisR (2005) Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition27(2): 141–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050096
20.
FalkYBardelC (2021) Transfer patterns in L3 learning discussed. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism11(1): 50–53. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.20082.fal
21.
FlynnSFoleyCVinnitskayaI (2004) The cumulative enhancement model for language acquisition: Comparing adults’ and children’s patterns of development in first, second and third language acquisition. International Journal of Multilingualism1: 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710408668175
22.
FoucartAFrenck-MestreC (2012) Can late L2 learners acquire new grammatical features? Evidence from ERPs and eye-tracking. Journal of Memory and Language66: 226–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.07.007
23.
FridmanCMeirN (2025) Dynamics of competition and co-activation in trilingual lexical processing: An eye-tracking study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition29: 132–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728925000252
24.
GodfroidA (2020) Eye tracking in second language acquisition and bilingualism: A research synthesis and methodological guide. New York: Routledge.
25.
GodfroidALoewenSJungS, et al. (2015) Timed and untimed grammaticality judgments measure distinct types of knowledge: Evidence from eye-movement patterns. Studies in Second Language Acquisition37: 269–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000850
26.
GoldschneiderJMDeKeyserRM (2005) Explaining the ‘natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition’ in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning55: 27–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00295.x
27.
González AlonsoJAlemán BañónJDeLucaV, et al. (2020) Event related potentials at initial exposure in third language acquisition: Implications from an artificial mini-grammar study. Journal of Neurolinguistics56: Article 100939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2020.100939
28.
González AlonsoJBernabeuPSilvaG, et al. (2025) Starting from the very beginning: Unraveling third language (L3) development with longitudinal data from artificial language learning and EEG. International Journal of Multilingualism22(1): 119–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2024.2415993
GreyS (2023) Using artificial languages to study third language learning and processing. In: CabrelliJChaouch-OrozcoAGonzález AlonsoJ, et al. (eds) The Cambridge handbook of third language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 724–43.
31.
HalmøyM (2008) Number, (in)definiteness and Norwegian nouns. In: GrønnA (ed.) Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, vol. 12. Oslo: ILOS, pp. 180–95.
32.
HammarbergB (2001) Roles of L1 and L2 in L3 production. In: CenozJHufeisenBJessnerU (eds) Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition: Psycholinguistic perspectives. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 21–41.
33.
HermasA (2010) Language acquisition as computational resetting: Verb movement in L3 initial state. International Journal of Multilingualism7(4): 343–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2010.487941
34.
HiroshZDeganiT (2021) Novel word learning among bilinguals can be better through the (dominant) first language than through the second language. Language Learning71(4): 1044–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12457
35.
JensenINWestergaardM (2022) Syntax matters: Exploring the effect of linguistic similarity in third language acquisition. Language Learning73(2): 374–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12525
36.
JinF (2009) Third language acquisition of Norwegian objects: Interlanguage transfer or L1 influence? In: Y-kIngridLeungY (ed.) Third language acquisition and universal grammar. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 144–61.
KeatingGD (2009) Sensitivity to violations of gender agreement in native and nonnative Spanish: An eye-movement investigation. Language Learning59: 503–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00516.x
39.
LaBrozziRM (2009) Processing of lexical and morphological cues in a study abroad context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
40.
LardiereD (2008) Feature-assembly in second language acquisition. In: LicerasJZoblHGoodluckH (eds) The role of formal features in second language acquisition. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 106–40.
41.
LardiereD (2009) Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research25: 173–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658308100283
42.
LenthRV (2023) emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means: R package version 1.8.7. Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/package=emmeans (accessed February 2026).
43.
LiPZhangFYuAZhaoX (2020) Language History Questionnaire (LHQ3): An enhanced tool for assessing multilingual experience. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition23(5): 938–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918001153
44.
LimJHChristiansonK (2015) Second language sensitivity to agreement errors: Evidence from eye movements during comprehension and translation. Applied Psycholinguistics36: 1283–1315. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716414000290
45.
LozanoC (2003) Universal Grammar and focus constraints: The acquisition of pronouns and word order in non-native Spanish. PhD Thesis, University of Essex, UK.
46.
MitrofanovaNLeivadaEWestergaardM (2023) Crosslinguistic influence in L3 acquisition: Evidence from artificial language learning. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism13(5): 717–42. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.22063.mit
47.
MitrofanovaNMinorSAthanasiadiCKolbNWestergaardM (2025) The role of heritage languages in L3 aspect processing: Evidence from eye-tracking. In: 47th Annual Meeting of the German Linguistic Society (DGfS): Variation and change, p. 245.
48.
Pereira SoaresSMKupischTRothmanJ (2022) Testing potential transfer effects in heritage and adult L2 bilinguals acquiring a mini grammar as an additional language: An ERP approach. Brain Sciences12(5): 669. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12050669
49.
PolinskyM (2018) Using judgments in second language acquisition research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50.
Puig-MayencoEGonzález AlonsoJRothmanJ (2018) A systematic review of transfer studies in third language acquisition. Second Language Research36(1): 31–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658318809147
51.
R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [software]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: https://www.R-project.org (accessed February 2026).
RaynerKWarrenTJuhaszBJLiversedgeSP (2004) The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition30(6): 1290–1301. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0278-7393.30.6.1290
54.
RothmanJ (2011) L3 syntactic transfer selectivity and typological determinacy: The typological primacy model. Second Language Research27: 107–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658310386439
55.
RothmanJ (2015) Linguistic and cognitive motivation for the typological primacy model of third language (L3) transfer: Considering the role of timing of acquisition and proficiency in the previous languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition18(2): 179–90.https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672891300059X
56.
RothmanJGonzález AlonsoJPuig-MayencoE (2019) Third language acquisition and linguistic transfer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57.
SegalowitzN (2003) Automaticity and second languages. In: DoughtyCJLongMH (eds) The handbook of second language acquisition. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 382–408.
UllmanMT (2001) The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition4: 105–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728901000220
63.
WestergaardMMitrofanovaNMykhaylykRRodinaY (2017) Crosslinguistic influence in the acquisition of a third language: The Linguistic Proximity Model. International Journal of Bilingualism21: 666–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006916648859
64.
WestergaardMMitrofanovaNRodinaYSlabakovaR (2023) Full transfer potential in L3/Ln acquisition: Crosslinguistic influence as a property-by-property process. In: CabrelliJChaouch-OrozcoAAlonsoJG, et al. (eds) The Cambridge handbook of third language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 219–42.
