This article examines whether the second language (L2) acquisition of English plural marking by learners from Generalized Classifier first languages (L1s) is affected by L1 transfer. Mandarin Chinese, Japanese and Korean exhibit micro-variation with regard to contexts in which plural markers are required, optional, or disallowed. This article lays out the predictions for L1 transfer from these three languages to English, based on the micro-variation, and under different theoretical approaches to transfer (the Feature Reassembly Hypothesis of Lardiere and the Morphological Congruency Hypothesis of Jiang et al.). The article then reviews seven studies that use online processing tasks in order to gauge whether L1 Mandarin / L1 Japanese / L1 Korean L2 English learners are sensitive to the omission of plural marking in English. The findings of these studies are discussed in light of the predictions based on micro-variation; the article lays out directions for possible future studies that would directly address L1 transfer in this domain.
AveryNMarsdenE (2019) A meta-analysis of sensitivity to grammatical information during self-paced reading: Towards a framework of reference for reading time effect sizes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition41: 1055–1087.
2.
BaekM (2002) A study on Korean plural senses. Discourse and Cognition9: 59–78.
3.
BaileyNMaddenCKrashenS (1974) Is there a ‘natural sequence’ in adult second language learning?Language Learning24: 235–43.
4.
ChangSJ (2009) Nominal structure and interpretation: On the syntax of the Korean determiner phrase. PhD Dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
5.
ChenY-H (2023) Measurement and optional classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Linguistics24: 74–118.
6.
ChierchiaG (1998) Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics6: 339–405.
7.
ChoiSHIoninT (2021) Plural marking in the second language: Atomicity, definiteness, and transfer. Applied Psycholinguistics42: 549–78.
8.
ChoiSHIoninTZhuY (2018) L1 Korean and L1 Mandarin L2 English learners’ acquisition of the count/mass distinction in English. Second Language Research34: 147–77.
9.
ChoiSHYoonJDayalV (2026) (In)definiteness in Korean: A case study. In: DayalV (ed.) The open handbook of (in)definiteness: A hitchhiker’s guide to interpreting bare arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
ChrabaszczAJiangN (2014) The role of native language in the use of the English nongeneric definite article by L2 learners: A cross-linguistic comparison. Second Language Research30: 351–79.
11.
de HoopH (1998) Partitivity. GLOT International3: 3–10.
12.
DulayHBurtM (1974) Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning24: 37–53.
13.
EubankL (1993/1994) On the transfer of parametric values in L2 development. Language Acquisition3: 183–208.
14.
ForsterKI (2010) Using a maze task to track lexical and sentence processing. The Mental Lexicon5: 347–57.
15.
HsiehM-L (2008) The internal structure of noun phrases in Chinese. Taipei, Taiwan: Crane Publishing.
16.
HwangSHLardiereD (2013) Plural-marking in L2 Korean: A feature-based approach. Second Language Research29: 57–86.
17.
IljicR (1994) Quantification in Mandarin Chinese: Two markers of plurality. Linguistics32: 91–116.
18.
IoninTAtilesAChoiSHLeeCEWuM-J. (2023) Online vs. offline sensitivity to missing plural marking in L2 English. In: GappmayrPKelloggJ (eds) Proceedings of the 47th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, pp. 366–79.
19.
IoninTChoiSHLiuQ (2022) What transfers (or doesn’t) in the second language acquisition of English articles by learners from article-less native languages?Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism12: 133–62.
20.
IoninTKoHWexlerK (2004) Article semantics in L2 acquisition: The role of specificity. Language Acquisition12: 3–69.
21.
IoninTZubizarretaMLBautista MaldonadoS (2008) Sources of linguistic knowledge in the second language acquisition of English articles. Lingua118: 554–76.
22.
JegerskiJ (2014) Self-paced reading. In: JegerskiJvan PatternB (eds) Research methods in second language psycholinguistics. New York: Routledge, pp. 20–49.
23.
JiangLJ (2017) Mandarin associative plural -men and NPs with -men. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics4: 191–256.
24.
JiangN (2004) Morphological insensitivity in second language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics25: 603–634.
25.
JiangN (2007) Selective integration of linguistic knowledge in adult second language learning. Language Learning51: 1–33.
26.
JiangNHuGChrabaszczAYeL (2017) The activation of grammaticalized meaning in L2 processing: Toward an explanation of the morphological congruency effect. International Journal of Bilingualism21: 81–98.
27.
JiangNNovokshanovaEMasudaKWangX (2011) Morphological congruency and the acquisition of L2 morphemes. Language Learning61: 940–67.
28.
JinJ (2015) The partitive construction in Mandarin Chinese. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics2: 85–120.
29.
KimC (2005) The Korean plural marker tul and its implications. PhD Dissertation, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
30.
KimJ (2008) The parameterization of plural markings in classifier languages. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics30: 159–73.
31.
KurafujiT (2004) Plural morphemes, definiteness, and the notion of semantic parameter. Language and Linguistics5: 211–42.
32.
KwonS-NZribi-HertzA (2004) Number from a syntactic perspective: Why plural marking looks ‘truer’ in French than in Korean. In: BonamiOCabredo HofherrP (eds) Empirical issues in formal syntax and semantics. Paris: Centre national de la recherche scientifique, pp. 133–58.
33.
LardiereD (2009) Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research25: 173–227.
34.
LeeCE (in progress) Second language acquisition of Korean plural marking. PhD Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
35.
LiY-HA (1999) Plurality in a classifier language. Journal of East Asian Linguistics8: 75–99.
36.
MansbridgeMPTamaokaK (2018) The (in)sensitivity of plural -s by Japanese learners of English. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics8: 176–98.
37.
ParkSY (2020) The role of human and definite features in Korean pluralization. Studies in Generative Grammar30: 175–96.
38.
RuskBParadisJJärvikiviJ (2020) Comprehension of English plural–singular marking by Mandarin-L1, early L2-immersion learners. Applied Psycholinguistics41: 547–77.
39.
SchwartzBDSprouseRA (1994) Word order and nominative case in non-native language acquisition: A longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German interlanguage. In: HoekstraTSchwartzBD (eds) Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar: Papers in Honor of Kenneth Wexler from the 1991 GLOW Workshops. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 317–68.
40.
SchwartzBDSprouseRA (1996) L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research12: 40–72.
41.
ShinKY (2007) Partitive structures. PhD Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
42.
SlabakovaR (2008) Meaning in the second language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
43.
SongY (2015) L2 processing of plural inflection in English. Language Learning65: 233–67.
44.
TangWFiorentinoRGabrieleA (2021) Examining transfer in the acquisition of the count/mass distinction in L2 English. Second Language Research39: 231–57.
45.
UedaYHaraguchiT (2008) Plurality in Japanese and Chinese. Nanzan Linguistics2: 229–42.
46.
VainikkaAYoung-ScholtenM (1994) Direct access to X-bar theory: Evidence from Korean and Turkish adults learning German. In: HoekstraTSchwartzBD (eds) Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar: Papers in Honor of Kenneth Wexler from the 1991 GLOW Workshop. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 265–316.
47.
VainikkaAYoung-ScholtenM (1996) The early stages in adult L2 syntax: Additional evidence from Romance speakers. Second Language Research12: 140–76.
48.
WenZMiyaoMTakedaAChuWSchwartzBD (2010) Proficiency effects and distance effects in nonnative processing of English number agreement. In: FranichKIsermanKMKeilLL (eds) Proceedings of the 34th Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, pp. 445–56.
49.
WhiteLValenzuelaEKozlowska-MacgregorMLeungY-KI. (2004) Gender agreement in nonnative Spanish: Evidence against failed features. Applied Psycholinguistics25: 105–133.
