This article provides a review of previous studies that have examined the effects of orthography on establishing contrastive phonological representations in second language acquisition and presents results from an original study on Mandarin speakers’ production of English stops investigating how the presence of orthography affects the production of phonological categories that involve allophony. English voiceless stops are canonically represented as aspirated [ph, th, kh] in word-initial/stressed onset positions but are realized as unaspirated [p, t, k] following /s/ and in unstressed, non-initial onset positions. The results of our imitation experiment showed that Mandarin speakers failed to correctly imitate the unaspirated allophones when presented with written input, and this orthographic effect was stronger with nonwords than with real words. These results are best explained by an orthography effect mediated by phonological awareness and prior linguistic experience.
BabelM (2012) Evidence for phonetic and social selectivity in spontaneous phonetic imitation. Journal of Phonetics40: 177–89.
2.
BarriosSLHayes-HarbR (2020) Second language learning of phonological alternations with and without orthographic input: Evidence from the acquisition of a German-like voicing alternation. Applied Psycholinguistics41: 517–45.
3.
BassettiB (2006) Orthographic input and phonological representations in learners of Chinese as a foreign language. Written Language and Literacy9: 95–114.
4.
BassettiB (2007) Effects of hanyu pinyin on pronunciation in learners of Chinese as a foreign language. In: GuderAJiangXWanY (eds) The Cognition, Learning and Teaching of Chinese Characters. Beijing, China: Beijing Language and Culture University Press, pp. 156–79.
5.
BatesDMaechlerMBolkerBWalkerS (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software67: 1–48.
6.
BestCTTylerMD (2007) Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In: MunroMJBohnO-S (eds) Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–47.
7.
BoersmaP (2009) Cue constraints and their interactions in phonological perception and production. In: BoersmaPHamannS (eds) Phonology in perception. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 55–110.
8.
BoersmaPEscuderoPHayesR (2003) Learning abstract phonological from auditory phonetic categories: An integrated model for the acquisition of language-specific sound categories. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, pp. 1013–16. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
9.
BoersmaPWeeninkD (2019). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 6.0.26) [computer program]. Available at: http://www.praat.org (accessed April 2023).
10.
BrannenK (2002) The role of perception in differential substitution. Canadian Journal of Linguistics47: 1–46.
11.
BroselowEKangY (2013) Phonology and speech. In: HerschensohnJYoung-ScholtenM (eds) The Cambridge handbook of second language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 529–54.
12.
BürkiASpinelliEGaskellMG (2012) A written word is worth a thousand spoken words: The influence of spelling on spoken-word production. Journal of Memory and Language67: 449–67.
13.
ChaoK-YChenL-m (2008) A cross-linguistic study of voice onset time in stop consonant productions. International Journal of Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing13: 215–32.
14.
ChrabaszczAWinnMLinCYIdsardiWJ (2014) Acoustic cues to perception of word stress by English, Mandarin and Russian speakers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research57: 1468–79.
15.
ClarkJYallopCFletcherJ (2007) An introduction to phonetics and phonology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
16.
ColtheartMUlichevaA (2018) Why is nonword reading so variable in adult skilled readers?PeerJ6: e4879.
17.
DupouxEKakehiKHiroseYPallierCMehlerJ (1999) Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: A perceptual illusion?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance25: 1568–78.
18.
DupouxESebastián-GallésNNavarreteEPeperkampS (2008) Persistent stress ‘deafness’: The case of French learners of Spanish. Cognition106: 682–706.
19.
DurvasulaKHuangH-HUeharaSLuoQLinY-H (2018) Phonology modulates the illusory vowels in perceptual illusions: Evidence from Mandarin and English. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology9: 7.
20.
EckmanFR (2008) Typological markedness and second language phonology. In: EdwardsJGHZampiniML (eds) Phonology and Second Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 95–116.
21.
EdwardsJGHZampiniML (eds) (2008) Phonology and second language acquisition. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University.
22.
ErdenerVDBurnhamDK (2005) The role of audiovisual speech and orthographic information in nonnative speech production. Language Learning55: 191–228.
23.
EscuderoPHayes-HarbRMittererH (2008) Novel second-language words and asymmetric lexical access. Journal of Phonetics36: 345–60.
24.
EscuderoPSimonEMulakKE (2014) Learning words in a new language: Orthography doesn’t always help. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition17: 384–95.
25.
EscuderoPWanrooijK (2010) The effect of L1 orthography on non-native vowel perception. Language and Speech53: 343–65.
26.
FlegeJE (1982) Laryngeal timing and phonation onset in utterance-initial English stops. Journal of Phonetics10: 177–92.
27.
FlegeJE (1987) The production of ‘new’ and ‘similar’ phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics15: 47–65.
28.
GassSM (1996) Second language acquisition and linguistic theory: The role of language transfer. In: FlynnSO’NeilW (eds) Linguistic theory in second language acquisition. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, pp. 384–403.
29.
GibsonTASummersC (2018) Polysyllabic shortening in speakers exposed to two languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition21: 471–78.
30.
HanJ-IKimSY (2022) Orthographic activation in spoken word recognition of L2 phonological variants. Second Language Research38: 671–88.
31.
HaoY-C (2018) Contextual effect in second language perception and production of Mandarin tones. Speech Communication97: 32–42.
32.
Hayes-HarbRBrownKSmithBL (2018) Orthographic input and the acquisition of German final devoicing by native speakers of English. Language and Speech61: 547–64.
33.
Hayes-HarbRChengH-W (2016) The influence of the Pinyin and Zhuyin writing systems on the acquisition of Mandarin word forms by native English speakers. Frontiers in Psychology7: 785.
34.
Hayes-HarbRNicolJBarkerJ (2010) Learning the phonological forms of new words: Effects of orthographic and auditory input. Language and Speech53: 367–81.
35.
HoD-a (1987) Shēngyùn xué zhōng de guānniàn hé fāngfǎ [Concepts and methods in phonology]. Taipei: Da-an.
36.
JunS-AOhM (2000) Acquisition of second language intonation. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 2000). Volume 4, pp. 73–76. Available at http://doi.org/10.21437/ICSLP.2000-754 (accessed April 2023).
37.
KeatingPA (1984) Phonetic and phonological representation of stop consonant voicing. Language60: 286–319.
38.
KenstowiczMSuchatoA (2006) Issues in loanword adaptations: A case study from Thai. Lingua116: 921–49.
39.
KimDClayardsM (2019) Individual differences in the link between perception and production and the mechanisms of phonetic imitation. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience34: 769–86.
40.
KuznetsovaABrockhoffPBChristensenRHB (2016) lmerTest: Test in linear mixed effects model. R package version 2.0-33. Available at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest (accessed April 2023).
41.
KwonH (2019) The role of native phonology in spontaneous imitation: Evidence from Seoul Korean. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology10: 10.
42.
LadefogedPJohnsonK (2010) A course in phonetics. 6th edition.Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
43.
LeeGShinD-JGarciaMTM (2019) Perception of lexical stress and sentence focus by Korean-speaking and Spanish-speaking L2 learners of English. Language Sciences72: 36–49.
44.
Lee-KimS-I (2021) Development of Mandarin tones and segments by Korean learners: From naïve listeners to novice learners. Journal of Phonetics86: 101036.
45.
LeechGRaysonP (2014) Word frequencies in written and spoken English: Based on the British National Corpus. Abingdon: Routledge.
46.
LenthR (2021) emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means: R package version 1.6.2-1. Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans (accessed April 2023).
47.
LinH-NLinC-JC (2010) Perceiving vowels and tones in Mandarin: The effect of literary Phonetic systems on phonological awareness. In: Proceedings of the 22nd North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-22) and the 18th International Conference on Chinese Linguistics (ICCL-18), Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
48.
LinY-H (2007) The sounds of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49.
LuY-AKimM (2016) Prosody transfer in second language acquisition: Tonal alignment in the production of English pitch accent by Mandarin native speakers. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies46: 785–816.
50.
LuY-ALee-KimS-I (2021) The effect of linguistic experience on perceived vowel duration: Evidence from Taiwan Mandarin speakers. Journal of Phonetics86: 101049.
51.
MajorRC (2008) Transfer in second language phonology: A review. In: EdwardsJGHZampiniML (eds) Phonology and second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 63–94.
52.
MennenI (2007) Phonological and phonetic influences in non-native intonation. Trends in linguistics studies and monographs, Volume 186. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
53.
MittererHErnestusM (2008) The link between speech perception and production is phonological and abstract: Evidence from the shadowing task. Cognition109: 168–73.
54.
MokP. P. K.LeeA.LiJ. J.XuR. B. (2018). Orthographic effects on the perception and production of L2 mandarin tones. Speech Communication, 101, 1–10.
55.
MousikouPSadatJLucasRRastleK (2017) Moving beyond the monosyllable in models of skilled reading: Mega-study of disyllabic nonword reading. Journal of Memory Language93: 169–92.
56.
NielsenK (2011) Specificity and abstractness of VOT imitation. Journal of Phonetics39: 132–42.
57.
OuS-c (2020) Perceptual training on lexical stress contrasts: A study with Taiwanese learners of English as a foreign language. Cham: Springer Nature.
58.
QinZTremblayA (2014) Effects of native dialect on Mandarin listeners’ use of prosodic cues to English stress. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Speech Prosody, Dublin, Ireland.
59.
R Core Team (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [software]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: http://www.R-project.org (accessed April 2023).
60.
RastleKHarringtonJColtheartM (2002) 358,534 nonwords: The ARC nonword database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology55: 1339–62.
61.
RogersH (2014) The sounds of language: An introduction to phonetics. Abingdon: Routledge.
62.
SchaeferVDarcyI (2014) Linguistic prominence of pitch within the native language determines accuracy of tone processing. In: MillerRTMartinKIEddingtonCM, et al. (eds) Selected Proceedings of the 2012 Second Language Research Forum: Building Bridges between Disciplines. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, pp. 1–14.
ShatzmanKBMcQueenJM (2006) Prosodic knowledge affects the recognition of newly acquired words. Psychological Science17: 372–77.
65.
SheaC (2017) L1 English/L2 Spanish: Orthography–phonology activation without contrasts. Second Language Research33: 207–32.
66.
ShowalterCE (2018) Impact of Cyrillic on native English speakers’ phono-lexical acquisition of Russian. Language and Speech61: 565–76.
67.
ShowalterCEHayes-HarbR (2013) Unfamiliar orthographic information and second language word learning: A novel lexicon study. Second Language Research29: 185–200.
68.
ShowalterCEHayes-HarbR (2015) Native English speakers learning Arabic: The influence of novel orthographic information on second language phonological acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics36: 23–42.
69.
SimonEChamblessDAlvesUK (2010) Understanding the role of orthography in the acquisition of a non-native vowel contrast. Language Sciences32: 380–94.
70.
TsukadaKHanJ-I (2019) The perception of Mandarin lexical tones by native Korean speakers differing in their experience with Mandarin. Second Language Research35: 305–18.
71.
VendelinIPeperkampS (2006) The influence of orthography on loanword adaptations. Lingua116: 996–1007.
72.
WalkerACampbell-KiblerK (2015) Repeat what after whom? Exploring variable selectivity in a cross-dialectal shadowing task. Frontiers in Psychology6: 546.
73.
WeberACutlerA (2004) Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language50: 1–25.
74.
WhalenDHBestCTIrwinJR (1997) Lexical effects in the perception and production of American English /p/ allophones. Journal of Phonetics25: 501–28.
75.
WickhamH (2009) ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer.
76.
YangJ (2021) Comparison of VOTs in Mandarin–English bilingual children and corresponding monolingual children and adults. Second Language Research37: 3–26.
77.
Young-ScholtenM (2002) Orthographic input in L2 phonological development. In: BurmeisterPPiskeTRohdeA (eds) An integrated view of language development: Papers in honor of Henning Wode. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, pp. 263–79.
78.
Young-ScholtenM (2004) Prosodic constraints on allophonic distribution in adult L2 acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism8: 67–77.
79.
Young-ScholtenMLangerM (2015) The role of orthographic input in second language German: Evidence from naturalistic adult learners’ production. Applied Psycholinguistics36: 93.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
