The type of processing-resource allocation (TOPRA) model predicts that the semantic processing of new second language (L2) words can impede the learning of their forms while structural processing can promote it. Using this framework, the present study examined the effects of processing type (semantic, structural, control), exposure frequency (one exposure, three exposures), and their combination on the learning of new L2 words through reading. Adult Japanese learners of English read a reading text that contained 10 target words, five of them were repeated only one time whereas the other five were repeated three times. They were asked to answer some comprehension questions as their primary task, and the participants in the semantic and structural processing groups were asked to perform the secondary vocabulary processing tasks (pleasantness rating and phonological recording, respectively) to further process target word meanings or forms. The unexpected first language (L1)-to-L2 and L2-to-L1 cued recall were administered. The positive effects of structural processing and exposure frequency were demonstrated in L1-to-L2 cued recall. The results further suggested that effects of vocabulary processing type and exposure frequency vary depending on how vocabulary gain is measured.
BarcroftJ (2002) Semantic and structural elaboration in L2 lexical acquisition. Language Learning52: 323–63.
2.
BarcroftJ (2003) Effects of questions about word meaning during L2 Spanish lexical learning. The Modern Language Journal87: 546–61.
3.
BarcroftJ (2004a) Effects of sentence writing in second language lexical acquisition. Second Language Research20: 303–34.
4.
BarcroftJ (2004b) Theoretical and methodological issues in research on semantic and structural elaboration in lexical acquisition. In Van PattenBWilliamsJRottS (eds) Form–meaning connections in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 219–34.
5.
BarcroftJ (2009) Effects of synonym generation on incidental and intentional L2 vocabulary learning during reading. TESOL Quarterly43: 79–103.
6.
BatesDMaechlerMBolkerBMWalkerS (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software67: 1–48.
7.
BissonMJvan HeuvenWJBConklinKTunneyRJ (2014) The role of repeated exposure to multimodal input in incidental acquisition of foreign language vocabulary. Language Learning64: 855–77.
8.
ChenCTruscottJ (2010) The effects of repetition and L1 lexicalization on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics31: 693–713.
9.
CraikFIMLockhartRS (1972) Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior11: 671–84.
10.
DayRROmuraCHiramatsuM (1991) Incidental EFL vocabulary learning and reading. Reading in a Foreign Language7: 541–51.
11.
EckerthJTavakoliP (2012) The effects of word exposure frequency and elaboration of word processing on incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition through reading. Language Teaching Research16: 227–52.
12.
EhriLC (1992) Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recording. In GoughPBEhriLCTreimanR (eds) Reading acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 107–43.
13.
ElgortICandrySBoutorwickTJEyckmansJBrysbaertM (2016) Contextual word learning with form-focused and meaning-focused elaboration. Applied Linguistics39: 646–67.
14.
FolseK (2006) The effect of type of written exercise on L2 vocabulary retention. TESOL Quarterly40: 273–93.
15.
HorstMCobbTMearaP (1998) Beyond a clockwork orange: Acquiring second language vocabulary through reading. Reading in a Foreign Language11: 207–23.
16.
HuckinTBlochJ (1993) Strategies for inferring word-meanings in context: A cognitive model. In HuckinTHaynesMCoadyJ (eds) Second language reading and vocabulary learning. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 153–76.
17.
HulstijnJH (2001) Intentional and incidental second language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automaticity. In RobinsonP (ed) Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 258–86.
18.
HulstijnJH (2003) Incidental and intentional learning. In DoughtyCJLongMH (eds) The handbook of second language acquisition. MA: Blackwell, pp. 349–81.
19.
HulstijnJHLauferB (2001) Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning51: 539–58.
20.
HulstijnJHHollanderMGreidanusT (1996) Incidental vocabulary learning by advanced foreign language students: The influence of marginal glosses, dictionary use, and reoccurrence of unknown words. Modern Language Journal80: 327–39.
21.
HydeTSJenkinsJJ (1969) The differential effects of incidental tasks on the organization of recall of a list of highly associated words. Journal of Experimental Psychology82: 472–81.
22.
Japan Association of College English Teachers (JACET) Basic Word Revision Committee (ed) (2003) JACET list of 8000 basic words. Tokyo: JACET.
23.
JoeA (2010) The quality and frequency of encounters with vocabulary in an English for academic purposes programme. Reading in a Foreign Language22: 117–38.
24.
KodaK (1989) Effects of L1 orthographic representation on L2 phonological coding strategies. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research18: 201–22.
KuznetsovaABrockhoffPBChristensenRHB (2014) lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models: R package version 2.0-20. Available at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest(accessed May 2020).
27.
LauferBHulstijnJH (2001) Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics22: 1–26.
28.
LauferBRozovski-RoitblatB (2011) Incidental vocabulary acquisition: The effects of task type, word occurrence and their combination. Language Teaching Research15: 391–411.
29.
LauferBRozovski-RoitblatB (2015) Retention of new words: Quantity of encounters, quality of task, and degree of knowledge. Language Teaching Research19: 687–711.
30.
MorrisCDBransfordJDFranksJJ (1977) Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior16: 519–33.
31.
NagyWEAndersonRCHermanPA (1987) Learning word meanings from context during normal reading. American Educational Research Journal24: 237–70.
32.
NagyWEHermanPAAndersonRC (1985) Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly20: 233–53.
33.
NelsonTO (1977) Repetition and depth of processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior16: 151–71.
34.
NelsonTOViningSK (1978) Effects of semantic versus structural processing on long-term retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory4: 198–209.
35.
ParibakhtTSWescheMB (1993) Reading comprehension and second language development in a comprehension-based ESL program. TESL Canada Journal11: 9–29.
36.
ParibakhtTSWescheM (1999) Reading and ‘incidental’ L2 vocabulary acquisition: An introspective study of lexical inferencing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition21: 195–224.
37.
ParryK (1993) Too many words: Learning the vocabulary of an academic subject. In HuckinTHaynesMCoadyJ (eds) Second language reading and vocabulary learning. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 109–27.
38.
Pellicer-SánchezASchmittN (2010) Incidental vocabulary acquisition from an authentic novel: Do things fall apart?Reading in a Foreign Language22: 31–55.
39.
PittsMWhiteHKrashenS (1989) Acquiring second language vocabulary through reading: A replication of the Clockwork Orange Study using second language acquirers. Reading in a Foreign Language5: 271–75.
40.
R Development Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing[computer software]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: http://www.R-project.org(accessed May 2020).
41.
RottS (1999) The effect of exposure frequency on intermediate language learners’ incidental vocabulary acquisition and retention through reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition21: 589–619.
42.
SchmittN (2008) Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teacher Research12: 329–63.
43.
SchneiderVIHealyAFBourneLEJr (2002) What is learned under difficult conditions is hard to forget: Contextual inference effects in foreign vocabulary acquisition, retention, and transfer. Journal of Memory and Language46: 419–40.
44.
ShareDL (1995) Phonological recoding and self-teaching: sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition55: 151–218.
45.
TekmenEAFDaloğluA (2006) An investigation of incidental vocabulary acquisition in relation to learner proficiency level and word frequency. Foreign Language Annals39: 220–43.
46.
WaringRTakakiM (2003) At what rate do learners learn and retain new vocabulary from reading a graded reader?Reading in a Foreign Language15: 130–63.
47.
WebbS (2007) The effects of repetition on vocabulary knowledge. Applied Linguistics28: 46–65.
48.
ZaharRCobbTSpadaN (2001) Acquiring vocabulary through reading: Effects of frequency and contextual richness. Canadian Modern Language Review57: 541–72.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
