AissenJ (2003) Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory21: 435–483.
2.
AmaralLRoeperT (2014) Multiple grammars and second language representations. Second Language Research30: 3–36.
3.
BylundE (2009) Maturational constraints and first language attrition. Language Learning59: 687–715.
4.
CarrollS (2001) Input and evidence: The raw material of second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
5.
FloresC (2010) The effect of age on language attrition: Evidence from bilingual returnees. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition13: 533–46.
6.
HicksGDomínguezL (2020) A model for L1 grammatical attrition. Second Language Research36(2): 143–165.
7.
JakobsonR (1941) Kindersprache, Aphasie, und allgemeine Lautgezetze [Child language, aphasia and general phonetic rules]. Uppsala: Almqvist and Wiksell.
8.
KrashenS (1982) Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.
9.
KrochATaylorA (1997) Verb movement in Old and Middle English: Dialect variation and language contact. In: van KemenadeAVincentN (eds) Parameters of morphological change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 297–325.
10.
LidzJGagliardiA (2015) How nature meets nurture: Universal Grammar and statistical learning. Annual Review of Linguistics1: 333–52.
11.
LightfootD (1991) How to set parameters: Arguments from language change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
LópezL (2012) Indefinite objects: Differential object marking, scrambling and choice function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
MontrulS (2008) Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism: Re-examining the age factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
14.
MontrulS (2014) Searching for the roots of structural changes in the Spanish of the United StatesLingua151: 177–96.
15.
MontrulS (2016) Age of onset of bilingualism effects and availability of input in first language attrition. In: NicoladisEMontanariS (eds) Bilingualism across the lifespan. Washington DC: de Gruyter, American Psychological Association, pp. 141–62.
16.
MontrulS (2017) Developmental continuity in morphosyntactic attrition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism7: 739–43.
17.
MontrulSSánchez-WalkerN (2013) Differential object marking in child and adult Spanish heritage speakers. Language Acquisition20: 109–32.
18.
MontrulSBatemanN (in press) Differential object marking in Romanian as a heritage language in the United States. In: MardaleAMontrulS (eds) The acquisition of differential object marking. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
19.
MontrulSBhattRGirjuR (2015) Differential object marking in Spanish, Hindi and Romanian as heritage languages. Language91: 564–610.
20.
MontrulSBhattRBhatiaAPuriV (2019) Case in Hindi as a weaker language. Frontiers in Psychology10: 461.
21.
PierceLGeneseeFKleinD (2016) Language loss or retention in internationally adopted children: Neurocognitive implications for second language learning. In: GeneseeFDelcencerieA (eds) Starting over: The language development of internationally-adopted children. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 179–202.
22.
PutnamMSánchezL (2013) What’s so incomplete about incomplete acquisition?: A prolegomenon to modeling heritage language grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism3: 478–508.
23.
SchmidMKöpkeB (2017) The relevance of first language attrition to theories of bilingual development. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism7: 637–67.
24.
Sharwood SmithMTruscottJ (2014) The multilingual mind: A modular processing perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
25.
TorregoE (1998) The dependency of objects. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
26.
VanPattenB (1996) Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and Research. NJ: Ablex.
27.
YangC (2002) Knowledge and learning in natural language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.