This article reports an empirical study investigating L2 acquisition of the Mandarin Chinese shì … de cleft construction by adult English-speaking learners within the framework of the Feature Reassembly Hypothesis (Lardiere, 2009). A Sentence Completion task, an interpretation task, two Acceptability Judgement tasks, and a felicity ranking task were administered to learners with intermediate and advanced Chinese proficiency (n = 76). The results reveal an initial mapping between the target Chinese structure and the English it-cleft construction. The relevant tense, telicity and discourse features are added in an uneven feature-by-feature manner in the subsequent feature reassembly. It is proposed that feature reassembly tasks involving cross-domain operations (e.g. from prosody to syntax) are more complicated and more difficult to accomplish than those taking place within the same linguistic domain.
AdgerD (2003) Core syntax: A minimalist approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
BellettiABennatiESoraceA (2007) Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near-native Italian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory25: 657–89.
3.
CarrollS (2001) Input and evidence: The raw material of second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
4.
ChengLLS (2008) Deconstructuring the shi … de construction. Linguistic Review25: 235–66.
5.
ChoJSlabakovaR (2014) Interpreting definiteness in a second language without articles: The case of L2 Russian. Second Language Research30: 159–90.
6.
DepraetereI (1995) On the necessity of distinguishing between (un)boundedness and (a)telicity. Linguistics and Philosophy18: 1–19.
7.
DuffPALiD (2002) The acquisition and use of perfective aspect in Mandarin. In: SalaberryRShiraiY (eds) The L2 acquisition of tense–aspect morphology. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 417–53.
8.
DufterA (2009) Clefting and discourse organization. In: DufterAJacobD (eds) Focus and background in Romance languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 83–121.
9.
É KissK (1998) Identificational focus versus information focus. Language74: 245–73.
10.
É KissK (1999) The English cleft construction as a focus phrase. In: MereuL (ed.) Boundaries of morphology and syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 217–29.
11.
GabrieleA (2009) Transfer and transition in the SLA of aspect. Studies in Second Language Acquisition31: 371–402.
12.
GavrusevaE (2008) On the role of DP in the acquisition of finiteness in Child L2 English. In: LicerasMZoblHGoodluckH (eds) The role of formal features in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 405–31.
13.
GilKHMarsdenH (2013) Existential quantifiers in second language acquisition: A feature reassembly account. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism3: 117–49.
14.
HawkinsRChanCY (1997) The partial availability of universal grammar in second language acquisition: The ‘failed’ functional features hypothesis. Second Language Research13: 187–226.
15.
HawkinsRHattoriH (2006) Interpretation of English multiple wh-questions by Japanese speakers: A missing uninterpretable feature account. Second Language Research22: 269–301.
16.
HertelT (2003) Lexical and discourse factors in the second language acquisition of Spanish word order. Second Language Research19: 273–304.
17.
HoleD (2011) The deconstruction of Chinese shi … de clefts revisited. Lingua121: 1707–33.
18.
HuangCTLiYHALiY (2009) The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
HwangSHLardiereD (2013) Plural-marking in L2 Korean: A feature-based approach. Second Language Research29: 57–86.
20.
JinL (2004) The development of aspect marking in L2 Chinese by English native speakers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
21.
KatzJSelkirkE (2011) Contrastive focus vs. discourse-new: Evidence from phonetic prominence in English. Language87: 771–816.
22.
LardiereD (2009) Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research25: 173–227.
23.
LiCNThompsonSA (1981) Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
24.
LiX (2004) Boya Chinese. Beijing: Peking University Press.
25.
LinJW (2000) On the temporal meaning of the verbal -le in Chinese. Language and Linguistics1: 109–33.
26.
LinJW (2002) Selectional restrictions of tenses and temporal reference of Chinese bare sentences. Lingua113: 271–302.
27.
LinJW (2003) Temporal reference in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics12: 259–311.
28.
LinJW (2006) Time in a language without tense: The case of Chinese. Journal of Semantics23: 1–53.
29.
LozanoC (2006) Focus and split-intransitivity: The acquisition of word order alternations in non-native Spanish. Second Language Research22: 145–87.
30.
MaiZ (2011) Zhongjiexing yu shi … de jiaodian jiegou [Telicity and the (shi) … de focus construction]. Yuyanxue luncong [Essays on Linguistics]44: 120–40.
31.
MaiZ (2012) Properties of the (shi) … de focus construction in adult L2 acquisition and heritage language acquisition of Mandarin Chinese. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
32.
MeiselJM (2011) First and second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
33.
PaulWWhitmanJ (2008) Shi … de focus clefts in Mandarin Chinese. The Linguistic Review25: 413–51.
34.
RitterERosenS (2000) Event structure and ergativity. In: TennyCPustejovskyJ (eds) Events as grammatical objects: The converging perspectives of lexical semantics and syntax. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 187–238.
35.
RizziL (1997) The fine structure of the left periphery. In: HaegemanL (ed.) Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 281–337.
36.
RochemontM (2013) Discourse-new, F-marking and normal stress. Lingua136: 38–62.
37.
RolandDDickFElmanJL (2007) Frequency of basic English grammatical structures. Journal of Memory and Language57: 348–79.
38.
RothmanJ (2009) Pragmatic deficits with syntactic consequences?: L2 pronominal subjects and the syntax–pragmatics interface. Journal of Pragmatics41: 951–73.
39.
SalaberryMR (2000) The acquisition of English past tense in an instructional setting. System28: 135–52.
40.
SchwartzBSprouseR (1996) L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research12: 40–72.
41.
SelinkerL (1992) Rediscovering interlangauge. New York: Longman.
42.
SelinkerLLakshmananU (1992) Language transfer and fossilization: The multiple effects principle. In: GassSMSelinkerL (eds) Language transfer in language learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 197–216.
43.
ShiD (1994) The nature of Chinese emphatic sentences. Journal of East Asian Linguistics3: 81–100.
44.
ShyuSI (2013) It-clefts in an English text and shi … (de) in its Mandarin translation. In: TsengM-Y (ed.) Analyzing language and discourse as intercultural and intracultural mediation. Kauhsiung: The Center for the Humanities, National Sun Yat-sen University, 109–30.
45.
SimpsonA (2001) Definiteness agreement and the Chinese DP. Language and Linguistics2: 125–56.
46.
SimpsonAWuZ (2002) From D to T – Determiner incorporation and the creation of tense. Journal of East Asian Linguistics11: 169–209.
47.
SlabakovaR (2005) What is so difficult about telicity marking in L2 Russian. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition8: 63–77.
48.
SlabakovaR (2013) Adult second language acquisition: A selective overview with a focus on the learner linguistic system. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism3: 48–72.
49.
SlabakovaRHuangYTZhuJQiaoZLuW (2012, October) L2 acquisition of temporal meanings without temporal morphology. Paper presented at the 5th Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition in North America conference, Lawrence, KA, USA.
50.
SlabakovaRKempchinskyPRothmanJ (2012) Clitic-doubled left dislocation and focus fronting in L2 Spanish: A case of successful acquisition at the syntax–discourse interface, Second Language Research28: 319–43.
51.
SmithCSErbaughM (2005) Temporal interpretation in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistics43: 713–56.
52.
SohHL (2009) Speaker presupposition and Mandarin Chinese sentence-final -le: A unified analysis of the ‘change of state’ and the ‘contrary to expectation’ reading. Natural Language Linguistic Theory27: 623–57.
53.
SoraceA (2011) Pinning down the concept of ‘interface’ in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism1: 1–33.
54.
SoraceAFiliaciF (2006) Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research22: 339–68.
55.
SpinnerP (2013) The second language acquisition of number and gender in Swahili: A feature reassembly approach. Second Language Research29: 455–79.
56.
SunS (2008) On shi … de sentences. Unpublished MA dissertation, Peking University, China.
57.
SybesmaR (1997) Why Chinese verb le is a resultative predicate. Journal of East Asian Linguistics6: 215–61.
58.
TsaiWTD (2008) Tense anchoring in Chinese. Lingua118: 675–86.
59.
TsangWL (2012) Aspectual marking among English and Korean learners of Chinese. Chinese as a Second Language Research1: 3–32.
60.
TsimpliIDimitrakopoulouM (2007) The interpretability hypothesis: Evidence from wh-interrogatives in second language acquisition. Second Language Research23: 215–42.
61.
WeinreichU (1953) Languages in contact: Findings and problems. Paris: Mouton and Co.
62.
WenX (1995) Second language acquisition of the Chinese particle le. International Journal of Applied Linguistics5: 45–62.
63.
WhiteL (2009) Some questions about feature re-assembly. Second Language Research25: 343–48.
64.
WilsonRDewaeleJM (2010) The use of web questionnaires in second language acquisition and bilingualism research. Second Language Research26: 103–23.
65.
YangCD (2004) Universal Grammar, statistics or both?Trends in Cognitive Sciences8: 51–456.
66.
YuanB (2010) Domain-wide or variable-dependent vulnerability of the semantics–syntax interface in L2 acquisition? Evidence from wh-words used as existential polarity words in L2 Chinese grammars. Second Language Research26: 219–60.
67.
YuanB (2014) ‘Wh-on-earth’ in Chinese speakers’ L2 English: Evidence of dormant features. Second Language Research30: 515–49.
