Two experiments involving picture classifications investigated priming behavior in the context of wh-movement at clause edge and in indirect object position, respectively. In Experiment 1, intermediate L1-Chinese L2-English learners produced slower classification times (inhibitions) at clause edge, apparently induced by the computation of intermediate traces, whereas faster classification times (facilitations) were detected in native speakers (NSs). In Experiment 2, advanced L1-English L2-French learners produced facilitations apparently induced by the computation of traces in indirect object position. Learners’ priming pattern differed from the priming pattern produced by NSs, however. We argue that the patterns found suggest structural computations interacting with distinct activation modes in the maintenance of discourse referents, plausibly resulting from the automaticity of lexical access, or lack thereof.
BaddeleyAHitchG (1974) Working memory. In: BowerIGA (ed.) The psychology of learning and motivation. New York: Academic Press, 47–90.
2.
BelikovaAWhiteL (2009) Evidence for the fundamental difference hypothesis or not?Studies in Second Language Acquisition31: 199–223.
3.
BeverTMcElreeB (1988) Empty categories access their antecedents during comprehension. Linguistic Inquiry19: 35–43.
4.
BrownJD (1980) Relative merits of four methods for scoring cloze tests. Modern Language Journal64: 311–17.
5.
CarrTDagenbachD (1990) Semantic priming and repetition priming from masked words: Evidence for a center-surround attentional mechanism in perceptual recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology16: 341–50.
6.
ClahsenHFelserC (2006a) Continuity and shallow structures in language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics27: 107–26.
7.
ClahsenHFelserC (2006b) Grammatical processing in language learning. Applied Psycholinguistics27: 3–42.
8.
DagenbachDCarrTHBarnhardtTM (1990) Inhibitory semantic priming of lexical decisions due to failure to retrieve weakly activated codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition16: 328–40.
9.
DanemanMCarpenterP (1980) Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior19: 450–66.
10.
DekydtspotterLSprouseRA (2003) L2 Performance: Interlanguage representations, computations, and intuitions. In: LicerasJMZoblHGoodluckH (eds) Proceedings of the 6th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition conference (GASLA): L2 Links. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 45–54.
11.
DekydtspotterLSchwartzBDSprouseRA (2006) The comparative fallacy in L2 processing research. In: Grantham O’BrienMSheaCArchibaldJ (eds) Proceedings of the 8th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition conference (GASLA): The Banff Conference, Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 33–40.
12.
FavreauMSegalowitzN (1983) Automatic and controlled processes in the first and second language reading of fluent bilinguals. Memory and Cognition11: 565–74.
13.
FelserCRobertsL (2007) Processing wh-dependencies in a second language: A cross-modal priming study. Second Language Research31: 9–36.
14.
FelserCRobertsLGrossRMarinisT (2003) The processing of ambiguous sentences by first and second language learners of English. Applied Psycholinguistics24: 453–89.
15.
FelserCSatoMBertenshawN (2009) The on-line application of Binding Principle A in English as a second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition12: 485–502.
16.
FodorJA (1983) The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
FodorJA (2000) The mind doesn’t work that way: The scope and limits of computational psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
FodorJD (1998) Parsing to learn. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research27: 339–74.
19.
ForsterKIForsterJC (2003) DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers35: 116–24.
20.
FrazierLCliftonC (1989) Successive cyclicity in the grammar and the parser. Language and Cognitive Processes4: 93–126.
21.
GibsonE (1998) Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition78: 1–76.
22.
GibsonE (2000) The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In: MiyashitaYMarantzAWarrenT (eds) Image language and brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 95–126.
23.
GibsonEWarrenT (2004) Reading-time evidence for intermediate linguistic structure in long-distance dependencies. Syntax7: 55–78.
24.
HarringtonMSawyerM (1992) L2 working memory capacity and L2 reading skill. Studies in Second Language Acquisition14: 25–38.
25.
HawkinsR (1989) Do second language learners acquire restrictive relative clauses on the basis of relational or configurational information? The object of French subject, direct object and genitive restrictive relative clauses by second language learners. Second Language Research5: 156–88.
26.
HawkinsRChanCY (1997) The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: The failed functional features hypothesis. Second Language Research13: 187–226.
27.
HawkinsRHattoriH (2006) Interpretation of English multiple wh-questions by Japanese speakers: A missing uninterpretable feature account. Second Language Research22: 269–301.
28.
JackendoffR (1987) Consciousness and the computational mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29.
LoveT (2007) The processing of non-canonically ordered constituents in long distance dependencies by pre-school children: A real-time investigation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research36: 191–206.
30.
LoveTSwinneyD (1996) Coreference processing and levels of analysis in object-relative constructions: Demonstration of antecedent reactivation in the cross-modal priming paradigm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research25: 5–24.
31.
LoveTMassESwinneyD (2003) The influence of language exposure on lexical and syntactic language processing. Experimental Psychology50: 204–16.
32.
MarinisTRobertsLFelserCClahsenH (2005) Gaps in second language sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition27: 53–78.
33.
MarrD (1982) Vision. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
34.
MartohardjonoG (1993) Wh-movement in the acquisition of a second language: A cross-linguistic study of three languages with and without movement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
35.
MatthewsSYipV (1994) Cantonese: A comprehensive reference grammar. London: Routledge.
36.
McKoonGRatcliffR (1994) Sentential context and on-line lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition20: 1239–43.
37.
McKoonGAlbrittonDRatcliffR (1996) Sentential context effects on lexical decisions with a cross-modal instead of an all-visual procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition22: 1494–97.
38.
NicolJSwinneyD (1989) The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research18: 5–20.
39.
NicolJSwinneyDLoveTHaldL (2006) The on-line study of sentence comprehension: an examination of dual task paradigms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research35: 215–31.
40.
PanH-YFelserC (2011) Referential context effects in L2 ambiguity resolution: Evidence from self-paced reading. Lingua121: 221–36.
41.
PapadopoulouDClahsenH (2003) Parsing strategies in L2 and L2 sentence processing: A study of relative clause attachment in Greek. Studies in Second Language Acquisition25: 501–28.
42.
PliatsikasCMarinisT (2012) Processing empty categories in a second language: When naturalistic exposure fills the (intermediate) gap. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. Available on CJO2012; doi:10.1017/S136672891200017X.
43.
ReulandE (2001) Primitives of binding. Linguistic Inquiry32: 430–92
44.
ReulandEReinhartT (1993) Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry4: 657–720.
45.
RobertsLMarinisTFelserCClahsenH (2007) Antecedent priming at trace positions in children’s sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research36: 175–88.
46.
SagIAFodorJD (1994) Extraction without traces. In: AranovichRByrneWPreussSSenturiaM (eds.) Proceedings of the 13th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 365–84.
47.
SegalowitzNSegalowitzSJ (1993) Skilled performance, practice, and the differentiation of speed-up from automatization effects: Evidence from second language word recognition. Applied Psycholinguistics14: 369–85.
48.
TsimpliIDimitrakopoulouM (2007) The interpretability hypothesis: Evidence from wh-interrogatives in second language acquisition. Second Language Research23: 215–42.
