Native speakers show systematic variation in a range of linguistic domains as a function of a variety of sociolinguistic variables. This article addresses native language variation in the context of multicompetence, i.e. knowledge of two languages in one mind (Cook, 1991). Descriptions of motion were elicited from functionally monolingual and non-monolingual speakers of Japanese, with analyses focusing on clausal packaging of Manner and Path. Results revealed that (1) acquisition of a second language (L2) appears to affect how speakers distribute information about motion in and across clauses in their first language (L1); (2) these effects can be seen with rather less knowledge of a second language than the advanced bilingual proficiency level typically studied; and (3) there appears to be little effect of L2 immersion in this domain since Japanese users of English as a second language (ESL) did not differ from Japanese users of English as a foreign language (EFL). We discuss the findings with respect to characterizations of emerging multicompetent grammars, and to implications for the construct of ‘the native speaker’, for language pedagogy and language assessment.
AllanD (1992) Oxford placement test. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
AllenSÖzyürekAKitaS. (2007) How language specific is early syntactic packaging of manner and path? A comparison of English, Turkish, and Japanese. Cognition102: 16–48.
3.
AlptekinC (2010) Redefining multicompetence for bilingualism and ELF. International Journal of Applied Linguistics20: 95–110.
4.
AmeelEMaltBCStormsG. (2009) Semantic convergence in the bilingual lexicon. Journal of Memory and Language60: 270–90.
5.
AmeelEStormsGMaltBC. (2005) How bilinguals solve the naming problem. Journal of Memory and Language52: 309–29.
6.
AnsaldoU (2010) Identity alignment and language creation in multilingual. Language Sciences32: 615–23.
7.
AthanasopoulosP (2006) Effects of the grammatical representation of number on cognition in bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition9: 89–96.
8.
AthanasopoulosPSasakiMCookV (2004) Do bilinguals think differently from monolinguals? Evidence from colour categorization by speakers of Japanese. European Second Language Association (EUROSLA)14. San Sebastian.
9.
BalcomP (2003) Cross-linguistic influence of L2 English on middle constructions in L1 French. In: CookV (ed.) Effects of the second language on the first. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 168–92.
10.
BermanRSlobinDI (1994) Relating events in narrative: A cross-linguistic developmental study. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
BowermanM (1982) Starting to talk worse: Clues to language acquisition from children’s late speech errors. In: StraussS (ed.) U-shaped behavioral growth. New York: Academic Press, 101–45.
12.
BrownA (2008) Gesture viewpoint in Japanese and English: Cross-linguistic interactions between two languages in one speaker. Gesture8: 256–76.
13.
BrownAGullbergM (2008) Bidirectional crosslinguistic influence in L1–L2 encoding of Manner in speech and gesture: A study of Japanese speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition30: 225–51.
14.
BrownAGullbergM (2010) Changes in encoding of path of motion after acquisition of a second language. Cognitive Linguistics21: 263–86.
15.
BrownAGullbergM (2011) Bidirectional cross-linguistic influence in event conceptualization? Expressions of Path among Japanese learners of English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition14: 79–94.
16.
BullockBEGerfenC (2004) Phonological convergence in a contracting language variety. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition7: 95–104.
17.
BylundE (2009) Effects of age of L2 acquisition on L1 event conceptualization patterns. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition12: 305–22.
18.
CenozJ (2003) The intercultural style hypothesis: L1 and L2 interaction in requesting behaviour. In: CookV (ed.) Effects of the second language on the first. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 62–80.
19.
CenozJHufeisenBJessnerUE (2001) Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
20.
ChambersJKTrudgillPSchilling-EstesN (2004) The handbook of language variation and change. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
21.
ChenFJ-G (2006) Interplay between forward and backward transfer in L2 and L1 writing: The case of Chinese ESL learners in the US. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics32: 147–96.
22.
CohenJ (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23.
ColantoniLGurlekianJ (2004) Convergence and intonation: Historical evidence from Buenos Aires Spanish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition7: 107–19.
24.
CookV (1991) The poverty of the stimulus argument and multicompetence. Second Language Research7: 103–17.
25.
CookV (1992) Evidence for multicompetence. Language Learning42: 557–91.
26.
CookV (1997) Monolingual bias in second language acquisition research. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses34: 35–50.
27.
CookV (2003) Effects of the second language on the first. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
28.
CookVBassettiBKasaiC. (2006) Do bilinguals have different concepts? The case of shape and material in Japanese L2 users of English. International Journal of Bilingualism10: 137–52.
29.
CookVIarossiEStellakisN. (2003) Effects of the L2 on the syntactic processing of the L1. In: CookV (ed.) Effects of the second language on the first. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 193–213.
30.
CookVJ (2007a) Multi-competence: Black hole or wormhole for second language acquisition research. In: HanZH (ed.) Understanding second language process. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 16–26.
31.
CookVJ (2007b) The nature of the L2 user. In: RobertsLGurelATatarS. (eds) Eurosla Yearbook7, 205–20.
32.
CrystalD (2003) English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
CunninghamTHGrahamCR (2000) Increasing native English vocabulary recognition through Spanish immersion: Cognate transfer from foreign to first language. Journal of Educational Psychology92: 37–49.
34.
DaviesA (2003) The native speaker: Myth and reality. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
35.
DeAngelisG (2007) Third or additional language acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
36.
DöpkeS (1998) Competing language structures: The acquisition of verb placement by bilingual German-English children. Journal of Child Language25: 555–84.
37.
DussiasPESagarraN (2007) The effect of exposure on syntactic parsing in Spanish–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition10: 101–16.
38.
EckertP (1989) The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation. Language Variation and Change1: 245–68.
39.
EckertP (2000) Linguistic variation as social practice. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
40.
FirthAWagnerJ (1997) On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal81: 285–300.
41.
FlegeJE (1987) The production of ‘new’ and ‘similar’ phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics15: 47–65.
42.
FrelengF (1950) Canary Row. New York: Time Warner.
43.
GassSSelinkerL (1992) Language transfer in language learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
44.
GathercoleVCMMoawadRA (2010) Semantic interaction in early and late bilinguals: All words are not created equally. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition13: 385–408.
45.
GrosjeanF (1989) Neurolinguists, beware! The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person. Brain and Language36: 3–15.
46.
GrosjeanF (1998) Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition1: 131–49.
47.
GullbergM (2012) Bilingual multimodality in language documentation data. Language Documentation and Conservation6: 47–54.
48.
GullbergMIndefreyP (2003) Language background questionnaire: Developed in the dynamics of multilingual processing project. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
49.
HallJKChengACarlsonM (2006) Reconceptualizing multicompetence as a theory of language knowledge. Applied Linguistics27: 220–40.
50.
HasegawaY (1996) The (nonvacuous) semantics of TE-linkage in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics25: 763–90.
51.
HeinzB (2003) Backchannel responses as strategic responses in bilingual speakers’ conversations. Journal of Pragmatics35: 1113–42.
52.
HulkAMüllerN (2000) Bilingual first language acquisition at the interface between syntax and pragmatics. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition3: 227–44.
53.
InagakiS (2002) Motion verbs with locational / directional PPs in English and Japanese. Canadian Journal of Linguistics47: 187–234.
54.
IoninTZubizarretaML (2010) Introduction to the special issue: Selective first language influence and retreat from negative transfer. Second Language Research26: 283–91.
55.
JarvisS (2000) Methodological rigor in the study of transfer: Identifying L1 influence in the interlanguage lexicon. Language Learning50: 245–309.
56.
JarvisS (2003) Probing the effects of the L2 on the L1: A case study. In: CookV (ed.) Effects of the second language on the first. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 81–102.
57.
JarvisS (2010) Comparison-based and detection-based approaches to transfer research. In: RobertsLHowardMÓ LaoireM (eds) EUROSLA Yearbook10, 169–92.
58.
JarvisSPavlenkoA (2008) Cross-linguistic influence in language and cognition. New York: Routledge.
59.
KecskesIPappT (2000) Foreign language and mother tongue. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
60.
KehoeMLleoCRakowM (2004) Voice onset time in German/Spanish bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition7: 71–88.
61.
KellermanESharwood SmithM (1986) Crosslinguistic influence in second language acquisition. New York: Pergamon.
62.
KitaSÖzyürekA (2003) What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language48: 16–32.
63.
KöpkeB (2002) Activation thresholds and non-pathological first language attrition. In: FabbroF (ed.) Advances in the Neurolinguistics of bilingualism. Udine: Forum, 119–42.
64.
KunoS (1973) The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
65.
LabovW (1963) The social motivation of a sound change. Word19: 273–309.
66.
LabovW (1966) The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics.
67.
LabovW (1972) Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Philadelphia Press.
68.
LabovWAshSBobergC (2006) The atlas of North American English: Phonetics, phonology and sound change. Berlin: Mouton/de Gruyter.
69.
LauferB (2003) The influence of L2 on L1 collocational knowledge and on L1 lexical diversity in free written expression. In: CookV (ed.) Effects of the second language on the first. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 19–31.
70.
MatsumotoY (1991) On the lexical nature of the purposive and participial complex motion predicates in Japanese. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 180–91.
71.
MatsumotoY (1996) Subjective motion and English and Japanese verbs. Cognitive Linguistics7: 183–226.
72.
McNeillD (1992) Hand and mind: What the hands reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
73.
MennenI (2004) Bi-directional interference in the intonation of Dutch speakers of Greek. Journal of Phonetics32: 543–63.
74.
MontrulS (2004) Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morphosyntactic convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition7: 125–42.
75.
MüllerN (2007) Bilingual first language acquisition at the interface between syntax and pragmatics. In: RobertsLMylesFDavidA (eds) EUROSLA Yearbook8. 52–78.
76.
MüllerNHulkA (2001) Crosslinguistic influence in bilingual language acquisition: Italian and French as recipient languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition4: 1–21.
77.
MuyskenP (2000) Bilingual speech: A typology of code-mixing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
78.
Myers-ScottonCLakeJL (2003) The out-of-sight in codeswitching and related contact phenomena. In: MondadaLDoehlerSP (eds) Plurilingualism. Tübingen/Basel: A Francke Verlag, 221–33.
NicoladisE (2003) Cross-linguistic transfer in deverbal compounds of preschool bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition6: 17–31.
81.
OdlinT (1989) Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
82.
OdlinT (2008) Conceptual transfer and meaning extensions. In: RobinsonPEllisN (eds) Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. New York: Routledge, 306–40.
83.
PakulakENevilleHJ (2010) Proficiency differences in syntactic processing of monolingual native speakers indexed by event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience22: 2728–44.
84.
PavlenkoA (2003) ‘I feel clumsy speaking Russian’: L2 influence on L1 in narratives of Russian L2 users of English. In: CookV (ed.) Effects of the second language on the first. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 32–61.
PikaSNicoladisEMarentettePF (2006) A cross-cultural study on the use of gestures: Evidence for cross-linguistic transfer?Bilingualism: Language and Cognition9: 319–27.
87.
RickfordJR (1999) African American vernacular English. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
88.
RingbomH (2007) Crosslinguistic similarity in foreign language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
89.
SanchezL (2004) Functional convergence in the tense, evidentiality, and aspectual systems of Quechua. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition7: 147–62.
90.
SerratriceLSoraceAPaoliS (2004) Crosslinguistic influence at the syntax–pragmatics interface: Subjects and objects in English–Italian bilingual and monolingual acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition7: 183–205.
91.
SlobinDI (2004) The many ways to search for frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In: StromqvistSVerhoevenL (eds) Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 219–57.
92.
SuI-R (2001) Transfer of sentence processing strategies: A comparison of L2 learners of Chinese and English. Applied Psycholinguistics22: 83–112.
93.
SuI-R (2010) Transfer of pragmatic competences: A bi-directional perspective. The Modern Language Journal94: 87–102.
94.
TalmyL (1985) Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In: ShopenT (ed.) Language typology and syntactic description. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 57–149.
95.
TalmyL (1991) Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: 480–519.
96.
TalmyL (2000a) Toward a cognitive semantics: Volume 1: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
97.
TalmyL (2000b) Toward a cognitive semantics: Volume 2: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
98.
ToribioAJ (2004) Convergence as an optimization strategy in bilingual speech: Evidence from code-switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition7: 165–73.
99.
Treffers-DallerJMougeonR (2005) The role of transfer in language variation and change: Evidence from contact varieties of French. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition8: 93–98.
100.
ValdmanA (1989) The elaboration of pedagogical norms for second language learners in a conflictual diglossia situation. In: GassSMaddenCPrestonDR (eds) Variation in second language acquisition: Volume 1: Discourse and pragmatics. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 15–34.
101.
WeingoldG (1995) Lexical and conceptual structures in expressions for movement and space: With reference to Japanese, Korean, Thai and Indonesian as compared to English and German. In: EgliUPausePESchwarzeC (eds) Lexical knowledge in the organization of language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 301–40.
102.
WeinreichU (1953) Languages in contact. The Hague: Mouton.
103.
YellandGWPollardJMercuriA (1993) The metalinguistic benefits of limited contact with a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics14: 423–44.
104.
YipVMatthewsS (2000) Syntactic transfer in a Cantonese-English bilingual child. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition3: 193–208.
105.
ZampiniMLGreenKP (2001) The voicing contrast in English and Spanish: The relationship between perception and production. In: NicolJ (ed.) One mind, two languages. Oxford: Blackwell, 23–48.
