Psycholinguistic word information in second language oral discourse

Abstract

This study uses word information scores from the Medical Research Council (MRC) Psycholinguistic Database to analyse word development in the spontaneous speech data of six adult learners of English as a second language (L2) in a one-year longitudinal study. In contrast to broad measures of lexical development, such as word frequency and lexical diversity, this study analyses L2 learners’ depth of word knowledge as measured by psycholinguistic values for concreteness, imagability, meaningfulness, and familiarity. Repeated measure ANOVAs yielded significant differences over time for concreteness, imagability, and meaningfulness, where the temporal intervals act as the independent variable, and the MRC values function as the dependent variables. Non-significant results were found for familiarity scores. The results provide evidence that learners’ productive vocabularies become more abstract, less context dependent, and more tightly associated over time. This indicates a deeper knowledge of second language vocabulary and has important implications for how vocabulary knowledge can be measured in future studies of L2 lexical development.

Keywords

second language acquisition concreteness imagability familiarity meaningfulness word association lexical vocabulary

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bogaards P. ( 2001) Lexical units and the learning of foreign language vocabulary . Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23: 321-43.

Carroll JB ( 1964) Language and Thought. Engleswood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Crossley SA , Salsbury T. , and McNamara DS ( 2009) Measuring L2 lexical growth using hypernymic relationships . Language Learning 59: 307-34.

Crossley SA , Salsbury T. , and McNamara DS ( 2010a). The development of semantic relations in second language speakers: A case for Latent Semantic Analysis. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics 7: 55-74.

Crossley SA , Salsbury T. , and McNamara DS ( 2010b) The development of polysemy and frequency use in English second language speakers. Language Learning 60: 573-605.

Crossley SA , Salsbury T. , McNamara DS , and Jarvis S. ( 2011) What is lexical proficiency? Some answers from computational models of speech data. TESOL Quarterly 45: 182-93.

Crossley SA , Salsbury T. , McNamara DS , and Jarvis S. (in press) Predicting lexical proficiency in language learners using computational indices. Language Testing.

Daller H. , van Hout R. , and Treffers-Daller J. (2003) Lexical richness in the spontaneous speech of bilinguals. Applied Linguistics 24: 197-222.

Ellis NC and Beaton A. ( 1993) Psycholinguistic determinants of foreign language vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning 43: 559-617.

10.

Gee NR , Nelson DL , and Krawczyk D. ( 1999) Is the concreteness effect a result of underlying network interconnectivity? Journal of Memory and Language 40: 479-97.

11.

Giacalone Ramat A. ( 1992) Grammaticalization processes in the area of temporal and modal relations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 14: 297-322.

12.

Gilhooly KJ and Logie RH ( 1980) Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation 12: 395-427.

13.

Graesser AC , McNamara DS , Louwerse MM , and Cai Z. ( 2004) Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 36: 193-202.

14.

Haastrup K. and Henriksen B. ( 2000) Vocabulary acquisition: Acquiring depth of knowledge through network building. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 10: 221-40.

15.

Herdan G. ( 1960) Type-token mathematics. Gravenhage : Mouton.

16.

Huckin T. and Coady J. ( 1999) Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second Language . Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21: 181-93.

17.

Jarvis S. ( 2002) Short texts, best-fitting curves and new measures of lexical diversity. Language Testing 19: 57-84.

18.

Jurafsky D. and Martin JH ( 2002) Speech and language processing: An introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics, and speech recognition . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall .

19.

Landauer TK ( 2007) LSA as a theory of meaning. In: Landauer T , McNamara D , Simon D , and Kintsch W (eds) Handbook of latent semantic analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

20.

Laufer B. and Paribakht S. ( 1998) The relationship between passive and active vocabularies: Effects of language learning context. Language Learning 48: 365-91.

21.

Malvern DD , Richards BJ , Chipere N. , and Durán P. ( 2004) Lexical diversity and language development: Quantification and assessment. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

22.

McCarthy PM and Jarvis S. ( 2007) vocd: A theoretical and empirical evaluation. Language Testing 24: 459-88.

23.

McCarthy PM and Jarvis S. ( 2010) MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods 42: 381-92.

24.

Meara P. ( 1983) Word associations in a foreign language: A report on the Birkbeck Vocabulary Project. Nottingham Linguistic Circular 11: 29-38.

25.

Meara P. and Bell H. ( 2001) P_Lex: A simple and effective way of describing the lexical characteristics of short L2 texts. Prospect 16: 5-19.

26.

Meara P. and Schur E. ( 2002) Random association networks: A baseline measure of lexical complexity. British Association for Applied Linguistics 34: 169-82.

27.

Miller G. , Beckwith A. , Fellbaum R. , Gross C. , and Miller KJ ( 1990) Introduction to WordNet: An on-line lexical database . International Journal of Lexicography 3: 235-44.

28.

Nation ISP ( 1988) Word Lists. Victoria: University of Wellington Press.

29.

Nation ISP ( 2005) Teaching and learning vocabulary. In: Hinkel E (ed.) Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 581-95.

30.

Nation ISP and Heatley A. ( 1996) VocabProfile, word and range: Programs for processing text. Victoria: LALS, Victoria University of Wellington.

31.

Paivio A. ( 1991) Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status . Canadian Journal of Psychology 45: 255-87.

32.

Paivio A. , Yuille JC , and Madigan S. ( 1968) Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph Supplement 76: 1-25.

33.

Polio C. ( 2001) Research methodology in second language writing research: The case text-based studies. In: Silva T and Matsuda PK (eds) On second language writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 91-115.

34.

Read J. ( 1993) The development of a new measure of L2 vocabulary knowledge . Language Testing 10: 355-71.

35.

Rintell EM ( 1989) That reminds me of a story: The use of language to express emotion by second-language learners and native speakers. In: Eisenstein MR (ed.) The dynamic interlanguage . New York: Plenum Press, 237-57.

36.

Schmitt N. and Meara P. ( 1997) Researching vocabulary through a word knowledge framework . Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19: 17-36.

37.

Schwanenflugel P. ( 1991) Why are abstract concepts hard to understand? In: Schwanenflugel P (ed.) The psychology of word meanings. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum , 223-50.

38.

Toglia MP and Battig WF ( 1978) Handbook of semantic word norms. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

39.

Vermeer A. ( 2000) Coming to grips with lexical richness in spontaneous speech data. Language Testing 17: 65-83.

40.

Wilson MD ( 1988) The MRC Psycholinguistic Database: Machine readable dictionary, Version 2. Behavioural Research Methods, Instruments and Computers 20: 6-11.

41.

Zareva A. ( 2007) Structure of the second language mental lexicon: How does it compare to native speakers’ lexical organization? Second Language Research 23: 123-53.