The novelty of Lardiere's proposal does not reside in her so-called `rehabilitation' of Contrastive Analysis. In generative second language acquisition research, appeal to the best available analyses and descriptions of the languages under investigation has always been a top priority, whether the focus was parameters, functional categories or features. The novelty resides in her putting feature assembly at the forefront of the research agenda. However, arguing for feature assembly, Lardiere fails to highlight the validity and potential of constructs such as parameter-setting and feature selection, mainly because feature assembly cannot exist without feature selection, and because the deductive value of parameters can be enhanced by research meant to discover how features combine.
Alexiadou, A. and Anagnostopoulou, E.1998: Parametrizing AGR: word order, v-movement and EPP checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16, 491-540.
2.
Baker, M.1996: The polysynthesis parameter. Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
Chierchia, G.1998: Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics6, 339-405.
4.
Chomsky, N.1977: On wh-movement. In Culicover, P., Wasow, T. and Akmajian, A., editors, Formal syntax. New York: Academic Press, 71-132.
5.
--1981 : Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht : Foris.
6.
Chomsky, N. and Lasnik, H.1993: The theory of principles and parameters. In Jacobs, A., von Stechow, W. and Vennemann, T., editors, Syntax: an international handbook of contemporary research. Berlin: De Gruyter, 506-69.
7.
Greenberg, J.H.1966: Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Greenberg, J.H., editor, Universals of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 73-113.
8.
Huang, J.1984: On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry15, 531-74.
9.
Ionin, T., Ko, H. and Wexler, K.The role of semantic features in the acquisition of English articles by Russian and Korean speakers. In Liceras, J.M., Zobl, H. and Goodluck, H., editors, The role of formal features in second language acquisition. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum, 226-68.
10.
Kayne, R.S.2005: Some notes on comparative syntax, with special reference to English and French. In Cinque, G. and Kayne, R.S., editors, The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax. New York: Oxford University Press, 3-69.
11.
Kim, C.2005: The Korean plural marker tul and its implications. Doctoral dissertation, University of Delaware.
12.
Lado, R.1957: Linguistics across cultures. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
13.
Lardiere, D.2007: Ultimate attainment in second language: a case study. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
-- 2008: Feature assembly in second language acquisition. In Liceras, J.M., Zobl, H. and Goodluck, H., editors, The role of formal features in second language acquisition. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 106-40.
15.
Liceras, J.M.1983: Markedness, contrastive analysis and the acquisition of Spanish as a second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
16.
-- 1986: Linguistic theory and second language acquisition: the Spanish nonnative grammar of English speakers. Tübingen : Gunter Narr.
17.
-- 1997: The now and then of L2 growing pains. In Díaz, L. and Perez-Vidal, C., editors, Views on the acquisition and use of a second language. EUROSLA97, 65-85.
18.
Lightfoot, D.1997: Shifting triggers and diachronic reanalyses. In Van Kemenade, A. and Vincent, N., editors, Parameters of morphosyntactic change . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
-- 2002: Grammatical approaches to syntactic change. In Janda, R. and Joseph, B., editors, Handbook of historical linguistics. Oxford: Black-well.
20.
Neeleman, A. and Szendrői, K.2005: Radical pro-drop and the morphology of pronouns. Unpublished manuscript, University College London and Utrecht University. Available online at: http://www.let.uu.nl/~Kriszta.Szendroi/personal/Radical%20Pro%20Drop%20and%20the%20Morphology%20of%20Pronouns%20-%20Distribution.pdf (December 2008).
21.
Platzack, C.2004: Agreement and the person phrase hypothesis. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax. Department of Scandinavian Languages, University of Lund, 73, 83-112.
22.
Rizzi, L.1982: Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht : Foris.
23.
-- 1986: Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry17, 501-57.
24.
Schiffrin, D.1981: Tense variation in narrative. Language57, 45-62.
25.
Taraldsen, T.1978: On the Nominative Island Condition, vacuous application, and the that-trace filter. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
26.
Vainikka, A. and Levy, Y.1999: Empty subjects in Finnish and Hebrew. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory17, 613-71.
27.
Van Buren, P. and Sharwood-Smith, M.1985: The acquisition of preposition stranding by second language learners and parametric variation. Second Language Research1, 18-46.
