The second language acquisition (SLA) literature reports numerous studies of proficient second language (L2) speakers who diverge significantly from native speakers despite the evidence offered by the L2 input. Recent SLA theories have attempted to account for native speaker/non-native speaker (NS/NNS) divergence by arguing for the dissociation between syntactic knowledge and morpho(pho)nology. In particular, Lardiere (1998), Prévost and White (2000), and Goad and White (2004) claim that highly proficient learners have knowledge of the abstract syntactic properties of the language but occasionally fail to associate them with the correct morphological or phonological forms. On the other hand, theories that support partial availability of Universal Grammar (UG) (Tsimpli and Roussou 1991; Hawkins and Chan, 1997) argue for a problem in the syntax: while UG principles and operations are available in SLA, the formal features of the target language that are not instantiated in the L1 or have a different setting, cause learnability problems. This article discusses acquisitional data in the light of the Interpretability Hypothesis (Tsimpli and Mastropavlou, 2007), which is a reformulation of the SLA theory suggested by Tsimpli and Roussou (1991) in minimalist terms. It is argued that a minimalist approach to SLA can be implemented to specify the status of the features that are least accessible to re-setting in the SLA process, given (1) constraints on their learnability and (2), their setting in the L1 grammar. The phenomenon discussed concerns the use of the resumptive strategy in wh- subject and object extraction by intermediate and advanced Greek learners of English. It is proposed that the acceptability rate of pronouns in the extraction site is conditioned by the Logical Form (LF) interpretability of the features involved in the derivation. Hence, the interpretable features of animacy and discourse-linking are hypothesized to be involved in the analysis of English pronouns by Greek L2 learners, while the first language (L1) specification of resumptive pronouns as clusters of uninterpretable Case and Agreement features resists resetting.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexiadou, A. and Anagnostopoulou, E.1998: Parametrizing agr: word-order, V-movement and EPP-checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory16, 491—539.
2.
Alexopoulou, T. and Keller, F.2003: Resumption and locality: a cross-linguistic experimental study. In Mikkelsen, L. and Potts, C., editors, Proceedings of WCCFL 21. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 15—28.
3.
Allan, D.1992: The Oxford placement test. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
Anagnostopoulou, E.1994: Clitic dependencies in modern Greek. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Salzburg, Austria.
5.
Aoun, J. and Li, Y.H.A.2003: Essays on the representational and derivational nature of grammar: the diversity of wh-constructions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
Beck, M.L.1998: L2 acquisition and obligatory head movement: English-speaking learners of German and the local impairment hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition20, 311—48.
7.
Belletti, A., Sorace, A. and Bennati, E.2005: Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: evidence from near-native Italian. Unpublished manuscript, University of Siena, Italy/University of Edinburgh , UK.
8.
Bley-Vroman, R.1989: What is the logical problem of foreign language learning? In Gass, S. and Schachter J., editors, Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 41—68.
9.
Cardinaletti, A. and Starke, M.1999: The typology of structural deficiency: a case study of the three classes of pronouns. In van Riemdijk, H., editor, Clitics in the languages of Europe. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter , 273—90.
10.
Cheng, L.1991: On the typology of wh-questions. Unpublished PhD Thesis , MIT, Cambridge, MA.
11.
Chomsky, N.1986: Knowledge of language: its nature, origin and use . New York: Praeger.
12.
—— 1995: The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
Clahsen, H. and Muysken, P.1986: The availability of universal grammar to adult and child learners — a study of the acquisition of German word order . Second Language Research2, 93—119.
14.
Epstein, S., Flynn, S. and Martohardjono, G.1996: Second language acquisition: theoretical and experimental issues in contemporary research. Brain and Behavioural Sciences19(4): 677—758.
15.
Flynn, S.1996: A parameter-setting approach to second language acquisition . In Ritchie, W. and Bahtia, T., editors, Handbook of language acquisition. San Diego: Academic Press, 121—58.
16.
Goad, H. and White, L.2004: Ultimate attainment of L2 inflection: effects of L1 prosodic structure. In Foster-Cohen, S. , Sharwood Smith, M., Sorace, A. and Ota M., editors, EUROSLAYearbook4. Amsterdam: John Benjamins , 119—46.
17.
Hawkins, R. and Chan, C.1997: The partial availability of universal grammar in second language acquisition: the `failed functional features hypothesis'. Second Language Research13, 187—226.
18.
Hawkins, R., Towell, R. and Bazergui, N.1993: Universal grammar and the acquisition of French verb movement . Second Language Research9, 189—233.
19.
Haznedar, B. and Schwartz, B.D.1997: Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition ? In Hughes, E., Hughes, M. and Greenhill, A., editors, Proceedings of the 21st Annual BUCLD. Somervillle, MA: Cascadilla Press, 257—68.
20.
Iatridou, S.1995: Clitics and island effects. Penn WorkingPapers in Linguistics2, 11—31.
21.
Johnson, J.S. and Newport, E.1989: Critical period effects in second language learning: the influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology21, 60—90.
22.
—— 1991: Critical period effects on universal properties of languages: the status of subjacency in the acquisition of a second language. Cognition39,215-58.
23.
Kiss, È.K.1998: Identificational focus versus information focus . Language74,425-73.
24.
Lardiere, D.1998: Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent L2 end-state grammar. Second Language Research14, 359—75.
25.
Manzini, R. and Savoia, L.2004: Clitics: cooccurence and mutual exclusion patterns . In Rizzi, L., editor, The structure of CP and IP: the cartography of syntactic structures. Volume 2. Oxford/ New York : Oxford University Press, 211—50.
26.
Meisel, J.1997: The acquisition of the syntax of negation in French and German: contrasting first and second language acquisition. Second Language Research13, 227—63.
27.
Ouhalla, J.1991: Functional categories and parametric variation . London: Routledge.
28.
Pesetsky, D.1987: Wh-in situ: movement and unselective binding. In Reuland, E. and ter Meulen, A., editors, The representation of (in)definiteness . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 98—129.
29.
Pollock, J.Y.1989: Verb-movement, UG and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry20, 325—424.
30.
Prévost, P. and White, L.2000: Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research16, 103—33.
31.
Rizzi, L.1986: Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry17,501-57.
32.
—— 1990: Relativised minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
Roberts, I. and Roussou, A.2003: Syntactic change: a minimalist approach to grammaticalization . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Roussou, A.2002: C, T and the subject: that-t phenomena revisited . Lingua112, 13—52.
35.
Schachter, J.1988: Second language acquisition and its relationship to universal grammar. Applied Linguistics9, 219—35.
36.
—— 1989: Testing a proposed universal. In Gass, S. and Schachter J., editors, Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 73—88.
37.
Schachter, J. and Yip, V.1990: Why does anyone object to object extraction?Studies in Second Language Acquisition12, 379—92.
38.
Schwartz, B. and Sprouse, R.1994: Word order and nominative case in nonnative language acquisition: a longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German interlanguage. In Hoekstra, T. and Schwartz, B.D., editors, Language acquisition studies in generative grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins , 317—68.
39.
—— 1996: L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research12, 40—72.
40.
Smith, N. and Tsimpli, I.M.1995: The mind of a savant: language learning and modularity . Oxford: Blackwell.
41.
Sorace, A.1993: Incomplete and divergent representations of unaccusativity in nonnative grammars of Italian. Second Language Research9, 22—48.
42.
—— 1996: The use of acceptability judgments in second language acquisition research. In Ritchie, W.C. and Bhatia T.K., editors, Handbook of second language acquisition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 375—409.
43.
—— 2000: Differential effects of attrition in the L1 syntax of near-native L2 speakers. In Howell, C., Fish, S. and Keith-Lucas, T., editors, Proceedings of the 24th Annual BUCLD. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 666—74.
44.
—— 2005: Selective optionality in language development. In Cornips, L. and Corrigan, K., editors, Biolinguistic and sociolinguistic accounts of syntactic variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 55—80.
45.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D.1995: Relevance: communication and cognition. 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.
46.
Tsimpli, I.M.1997: Resumptive features and minimalism: evidence from second language acquisition. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 21, 639—55.
47.
—— 1999: Null operators, clitics and identification: a comparison between Greek and English. In Alexiadou, A. , Horrocks, G. and Stavrou, M., editors, Studies in Greek syntax . Dordrecht: Kluwer, 241—62.
48.
—— 2003: Interrogatives in the Greek/English interlanguage: a minimalist account. In Mela-Athanasopoulou, E., editor, Selected papers on theoretical and applied linguistics. Thessaloniki: Aristotle University, 214—25.
49.
—— 2005: Variation in the L2 speaker. In Brown, K., editor, Encyclopaedia of language and linguistics : volume 13. 2nd Edition. Oxford: Elsevier, 387—94.
50.
Tsimpli, I.M. and Mastropavlou, M.2007: Feature interpretability in L2 acquisition and SLI: Greek clitics and determiners. In Liceras, J., Zobl, H. and Goodluck, H., editors, The role of formal features in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51.
Tsimpli, I.M. and Roussou, A.1991: Parameter-resetting in L2? UCL WorkingPapers in Linguistics3, 149—70.
52.
Tsimpli, I.M. and Sorace, A.2005: Differentiating `interfaces': L2 performance in syntax—semantics and syntax—discourse phenomena. Unpublished paper presented at BUCLD 30, Boston University, MA, November 4—6, 2005.
53.
Tsimpli, I.M. and Stavrakaki, S.1999: The effects of a morphosyntactic deficit in the determiner system: the case of a Greek SLI child. Lingua108,31-85.
54.
White, L.1985: The acquisition of parameterised grammar: subjacency in second language acquisition. Second Language Research1, 1—17.
55.
—— 1986: Implications of parametric variation for adult second language acquisition: an investigation of the pro-drop parameter. In Cook, V.J., editor, Experimental approaches to second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 55—72.
56.
White, L. and Juffs, A.1998: Constraints on wh-movement in two different contexts of nonnative language acquisition: competence and processing. In Flynn, S., Martohardjono, G. and O'Neil, W., editors, The generative study of second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 111—29.
57.
White, L., Montrul S., Hirakawa M., Chen D., Bruhn de Garavito, J. and Brown, C.1998: Zero morphology and the T/SM restriction in the L2 acquisition of psych verbs. In Beck, M.L. , editor, Morphology and its interfaces in second language knowledge . Amsterdam: John Benjamins , 257—82.
