This article reviews the literature on television viewer selectivity and links it to the findings of a Flemish survey. The article suggests that selective viewing does exist and that some viewers are more selective than others. At the same time the results show that the average viewer nevertheless watches a basic amount of most programme categories. Viewer selectivity is not necessarily efficient. Viewers develop viewing habits and as such may not watch their preferred programmes simply because they are not aware those programmes are broadcast. With respect to television effect theories the article suggests that the existence of selectivity does not necessarily reduce the `mainstream pull' of television. The VCR in particular may actually function as an accelerator of the potential effects of action drama.
Barnett, G.A.
, H.J. Chang, E.L. Fink and W.D. Richards (1991) `Seasonality in Television Viewing, a Mathematical Model of Cultural Processes', Communication Research18(6): 755-772.
2.
Barwise, P.
and A.S.C. Ehrenberg (1988) Television and its Audience. London: Sage.
3.
Barwise, P.
, A.S.C. Ehrenberg and G.J. Goodhardt (1982) `Glued to the Box? Patterns of TV Repeat Viewing', Journal of Communication32: 22-29.
4.
Billiet, J.
and G. Loosveldt (1988) `Improvement of the Quality of Responses to Factual Survey Questions by Interviewer Training'. Public Opinion Quarterly52: 190-211.
5.
Brosius, H.-B.
, M. Wober and G. Weimann (1992) `The Loyalty of Television Viewing: How Consistent is TV-Viewing Behavior', Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media36(3): 321-336.
6.
Carton, A.
and G. Loosveldt (1991) Over Interviewen Gesproken: Handleiding by de Training van Interviewers. Leuven: KUL Departement Sociologie.
7.
Dobrow, J.R.
(1990) `Patterns of Viewing and VCR-Use: Implications for Cultivation Analysis', in N. Signorielli and M. Morgan (eds) Cultivation Analysis, New Directions in Media Effects Research, pp. 13-34. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
Donsbach, W.
(1989) `Selektive zuwendung zu Medieninhalten, Einflußfaktoren auf die Auswahlentscheidungen des Rezipienten', Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. Sonderherft 30: 392-405.
9.
Ehrenberg, A.S.C.
, G.J. Goodhardt and T.P. Barwise (1990) `Double Jeopardy Revisited', Journal of Marketing54: 82-91.
10.
Espe, H.
and M. Seiwert (1986) `European Television Viewer Types: A Six-Nation Classification by Programme Interest', European Journal of Communication1: 301-325.
11.
Fiske, J.
(1987) Television Culture. London: Methuen.
12.
Frank, R.
and M. Greenberg (1980) The Public's Use of Television. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13.
Goodhardt, G.J.
, A.S.C. Ehrenberg and M.A. Collins (1987) The Television Audience, Patterns of Viewing, An Update. Aldershot: Gower.
14.
Greeno, J.
(1976) `Indefinite Goals in Well-Structured Problems', Psychological Review83: 419-491.
15.
Gunter, B.
(1985) `Determinants of Television Viewing Preferences', in D. Zillmann and J. Bryant (eds) Selective Exposure to Television, pp. 93-112. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Hawkins, R.P.
, N. Reynolds and S. Pingree (1991) `In Search of Television Viewing Styles', Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media35(3): 375-383.
17.
Heeter, C.
(1985) `Program Selection with Abundance of Choice: A Process Model', Human Communication Research12(1): 126-152.
18.
Heeter, C.
and B.S. Greenberg (1988) `A Theoretical Overview of the Program Choice Process', in C. Heeter and B.S. Greenberg, (eds) Cableviewing, pp. 33-51. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
19.
Herzog, H.
(1971) `Professor Quiz, a Gratification Study,' in P.F. Lazarsfeld (ed.) Radio and the Printed Page, pp. 64-90. New York: Arno Press.
20.
Hirsch, P.M.
(1981) `The “Scary World” of the Nonviewer and other Anomalies, a Reanalysis of Gerbner et al.'s Findings on Cultivation Analysis', in G. Cleveland Wilhoit (ed.) Mass Communication Review Yearbook, Vol. 2, pp. 529-581. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
21.
Hunter, J.E.
(1980) `Factor Analysis', in P.R. Monge and J.N. Capella (eds) Multivariate Techniques in Human Communication Research, pp. 229-257. New York: Academic Press.
22.
Jeffres, L.
(1978) `Cable TV and Viewer Selectivity', Journal of Broadcasting22: 167-177.
23.
Jolliffe, I.T.
(1972) `Discarding Variables in Principal Components Analysis 1: Artificial Data', Applied Statistics21: 160-173.
24.
Kim, J.-O.
and C. W. Mueller (1978) Factor Analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical Issues. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
25.
Levy, M.R.
and E.L. Fink (1984) `Home Video Recorders and the Transience of Television Broadcasts', Journal of Communication34(2): 56-71.
26.
Levy, M.R.
and S. Windahl (1985) `The Concept of Audience Activity', in K.E. Rosengren, L.A. Wenner and Ph. Palmgreen (eds) Media Gratifications Research: Current Perspectives, pp. 109-122. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27.
Liebes, T.
and E. Katz (1990) The Export of Meaning: Cross Cultural Readings of Dallas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
Livingstone, S.M.
(1990) Making Sense of Television: The Psychology of Audience Interpretation. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
29.
Livingstone, S.M.
(1992) `The Resourceful Reader: Interpreting Television Characters and Narratives', in S.A. Deetz (ed.) Communication Yearbook, Vol. 15, pp. 58-90. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30.
McLeod, J.M.
and L.B. Becker (1974) `Testing the Validity of Gratification Measures Through Political Effects Analysis', in J.G. Blumler and E. Katz (eds) The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research, pp 137-164. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
31.
McPhee, W.N.
(1963) Formal Theories of Mass Behavior. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
32.
McQuail, D.
, J. Blumler and J. Brown (1972) `The Television Audience, a Revised Perspective', in D. McQuail (ed.) Sociology of Mass Communications, pp. 135-165. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
33.
Morgan, M.
and N. Signorielli (1990) `Cultivation Analysis: Conceptualization and Methodology', in N. Signorielli and M. Morgan (eds) Cultivation Analysis, New Directions in Media Effects Research, pp. 13-34. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34.
Morgan, M.
, J. Shanahan and C. Harris (1990) `VCRs and the Effects of Television: New Diversity or More of the Same?' in J.R. Dobrow (ed.) Social and Cultural Aspects of VCR Use, pp. 107-123. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
Neuman, W.R.
(1991) The Future of the Mass Audience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
O'Keefe, G.J.
(1984) `Public Views on Crime: Television Exposure and Media Credibility', in R.N. Bostrom (ed.) Communication Yearbook 8, pp. 514-535. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
37.
Perse, M.
, D.A. Ferguson and D.M. McLeod (1994) `Cultivation in the Newer Media Environment', Communication Research21(1): 79-104.
38.
Potter, W.J.
(1993) `Cultivation Theory and Research, A Conceptual Critique', Human Communication Research19(4): 564-601.
39.
Potter, W.J.
and I.C. Chang (1990) `Television Exposure Measures and the Cultivation Hypothesis', Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media34(3): 313-333.
40.
Rosengren, K.E.
and S. Windahl (1989) Media Matter, TV Use in Childhood and Adolescence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
41.
Seiter, E.
, H. Borchers, G. Kreutzner and E.-M. Warth (eds) (1992) Remote Control, Television Audiences and Cultural Power. London: Routledge.
42.
Signorielli, N.
(1986) `Selective Television Viewing: A Limited Possibility', Journal of Communication36(3): 64-76.
43.
Snow, R.P.
(1983) Creating Media Culture. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
44.
Vandebosh, H.
and K. Roe (1995) Weer of Geen Weer, Kijk of Kÿk (met) Meer. Leuven, Dept Communicatie.
45.
Webster, J.
(1989) `Television Audience Behavior: Patterns of Exposure in the New Media Environment', in J. Salvaggio and J. Bryant (eds) Media Use in the Information Age: Emerging Patterns of Adoption and Consumer Use, pp. 197-216. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46.
Webster, J.G.
and G.D. Newton (1988) `Structural Determinants of the Television News Audience', Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media32(4): 381-389.
47.
Webster, J.G.
and J.J. Wakshlag (1982) `The Impact of Group Viewing on Patterns of Television Programme Choice', Journal of Broadcasting26(1): 445-455.
48.
Webster, J.G.
and J.J. Wakshlag (1983) `A Theory of Television Programme Choice', Communication Research10(4): 430-446.
49.
Webster, J.G.
and J.J. Wakshlag (1985) `Measuring Exposure to Television', in D. Zillmann and J. Bryant (eds) Selective Exposure to Television, pp. 35-62. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50.
Webster, J.G.
and T.Y. Wang (1992) `Structural Determinants of Exposure to Television: The Case of Repeat Viewing', Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media36: 125-136.
51.
Weimann, G.
, H.-B. Brosius and M. Wober (1992) `TV-Diets: Towards a Typology of TV Viewership', European Journal of Communication7: 491-515.
52.
Wober, J.M.
(1986) `The Lens of Television and the Prism of Personality', in J. Bryant and D. Zillmann (eds) Perspectives on Media Effects, pp. 205-231. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
53.
Zillmann, D.
and J. Bryant (1985) `Affect, Mood, and Emotion as Determinants of Selective Exposure', in D. Zillmann and J. Bryant (eds) Selective Exposure to Communication, pp. 157-190. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
