DryzekJ (
2009) Democratization as deliberative capacity building. Comparative Political Studies42(
11): 1379–
1402.
2.
HabermasJ (
1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Polity.
3.
KapoorS (
1995) Most papers receive more letters. The Masthead47(
2): 5–
9.
4.
KovarikB (
2016) Revolutions in Communication: Media History from Gutenberg to the Digital Age. New York: Continuum.
5.
KunstMPorten-CheéPEmmerM, et al. (
2021) Do “good citizens” fight hate speech online? Effects of solidarity citizenship norms on user responses to hate comments. Journal of Information Technology & Politics18(
3): 258–
273.
6.
LemertJBLarkinJ (
1979) Some reasons why mobilizing information fails to be in letters to the editor. Journalism Quarterly56: 504–
512.
7.
MorenoR (
2006) Citizens and media cultures: Hidden behind democratic formality. Global Media and Communication2(
3): 299–
313.
8.
PapacharissiZ (
2009) The citizen is the message: Alternative modes of civic engagement. In: PapacharissiZ (ed.) Journalism and Citizenship: New Agendas in Communication. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 29–
43.
9.
PetersHPDunwoodySAllgaierJ, et al. (
2014) Public communication of science 2.0: Is the communication of science via the “new media” online a genuine transformation or old wine in new bottles?EMBO Reports15(
7): 749–
753.
10.
RibeiroF (
2017) Opinião pública nos média em Portugal: quem participa e porquê? [Public Opinion in the Portuguese Media: Who Participates and Why?]. Braga: Communication and Society Research Centre – University of Minho.
11.
Wahl-JorgensenK (
2002) The construction of the public in letters to the editor: Deliberative democracy and the idiom of insanity. Journalism3(
2): 183–
204.