Along with the recent boom in support of populist movements in Europe, social media seems to be the ideal place for their interaction with the public. While Facebook has been thoroughly explored for populist campaigning, there is still scarce research on visual aspects of their communication. Analysing the 2019 European Parliament campaign, this study seeks to determine the distinct characteristics of a populist visual communication style and its differences in relation to the non-populist parties. Applying quantitative content analysis to the images (N = 997) posted on Facebook by political parties from 28 countries enabled us to show that there is a predominance of similarities in both communication styles. Although populists demonstrated a higher propensity to depict their leader and use national symbols, these were exceptions to the overwhelming evidence of uniformity in campaigning methods. Hence, we argue that despite evidence of textual visibility, populist communication does not explicitly manifest through images.
AalbergTEsserFReinemannC, et al. (eds) (2016) Populist Political Communication in Europe. 1st ed. London: Routledge.
2.
AdamiA (2020) Visual analysis and right wing (populist) groups. Partecipazione and Conflitto13(1): 315–336.
3.
Baldwin-PhilippiJ (2018) The technological performance of populism. New Media & Society21(2): 376–397.
4.
BanducciSAKarpJAThrasherM, et al. (2008) Ballot photographs as cues in low-information elections. Political Psychology29(6): 903–917.
5.
BastJ (2021) Managing the image. The visual communication strategy of European right-wing populist politicians on Instagram. Journal of Political MarketingOnline first: 1–30.
6.
BennettWLSegerbergA (2012) The logic of connective action: digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society15(5): 739–768.
7.
BucyEPJooJ (2021) Editors’ introduction: visual politics, grand collaborative programs, and the opportunity to think big. The International Journal of Press/Politics26(1): 5–21.
8.
CanovanM (1999) Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies47(1): 2–16.
9.
ColemanRDenis WuH (2015) Image and Emotion in Voter Decisions: The Affect Agenda. Lanham: Lexington Books.
10.
DanVArendtF (2021) Visual cues to the hidden agenda: investigating the effects of ideology-related visual subtle backdrop cues in political communication. The International Journal of Press/Politics26(1): 22–45.
11.
de VreeseCHEsserFAalbergT, et al. (2018) Populism as an expression of political communication content and style: a new perspective. The International Journal of Press/Politics23(4): 423–438.
12.
EkmanMWidholmA (2017) Political communication in an age of visual connectivity: exploring Instagram practices among Swedish politicians. Northern Lights15(1): 15–32.
13.
EngesserSErnstNEsserF, et al. (2017) Populism and social media: how politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society20(8): 1109–1126.
14.
FamulariU (2021) The strategic use of visuals on Facebook: a multimodal analysis of images and audience reactions during the campaign for the 2019 UK general elections. Visual Communication Quarterly28(4): 199–211.
15.
FarkasXBeneM (2020) Images, Politicians, and Social Media: Patterns and Effects of Politicians’ Image-Based Political Communication Strategies on Social Media. The International Journal of Press/Politics26(1): 119–142. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1940161220959553.
16.
FawziN (2019) Untrustworthy news and the media as “enemy of the people?” How a populist worldview shapes recipients’ attitudes toward the media. The International Journal of Press/Politics24(2): 146–164.
17.
GimenezESchwarzN (2016) The visual construction of ‘the people’ and ‘proximity to the people’ on the online platforms of the national front and Swiss people’s party. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie41(2): 213–242.
18.
GrabeMEBucyEP (2009) Image Bite Politics: News and the Visual Framing of Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
GraberDA (1996) Say it with pictures. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science546: 85–96.
20.
HokkaJNelimarkkaM (2020) Affective economy of national-populist images: investigating national and transnational online networks through visual big data. New Media & Society22(5): 770–792.
21.
Holtz-BachaC (2002) Professionalization of political communication: the case of the 1998 SPD campaign. Journal of Political Marketing1(4): 23–37.
22.
HopsterJ (2020) Mutual affordances: the dynamics between social media and populism. Media, Culture & Society43(3): 551–560.
23.
JohanssonBHoltz-BachaC (2019) From analogue to digital negativity: attacks counterattacks, satire, and absurdism on election posters offline and online. In: VenetiAJacksonDLillekerDG (eds) Visual Political Communication. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.99–118.
24.
KreissDMcGregorSC (2018) Technology firms shape political communication: the work of Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, and Google with campaigns during the 2016 U.S. presidential cycle. Political Communication35(2): 155–177.
25.
KriesiH (2014) The populist challenge. West European Politics37(2): 361–378.
26.
LarssonAO (2020) Picture-perfect populism: tracing the rise of European populist parties on Facebook. New Media & Society24(1): 227–245.
27.
MendonçaRFCaetanoRD (2021) Populism as parody: the visual self-presentation of Jair Bolsonaro on Instagram. The International Journal of Press/Politics26(1): 210–235.
28.
MendonçaRFCaetanoRD (2021) Populism as Parody: The Visual Self-Presentation of Jair Bolsonaro on Instagram. The International Journal of Press/Politics26(1): 210–235. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1940161220970118.
29.
MoffittB (2016) The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
30.
MuddeC (2004) The populist zeitgeistGovernment and Opposition39(4): 541–563.
31.
MuñozCLTownerTL (2017) The image is the message: Instagram marketing and the 2016 presidential primary season. Journal of Political Marketing16(3–4): 290–318.
PanebiancoA (1988) Political Parties: Organization and Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35.
ReifKSchmittH (1980) Nine second-order national elections: a conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results. European Journal of Political Research8(1): 3–44.
36.
RooduijnMvan KesselSFroioC, et al. (2019) The PopuList: an overview of populist, far right, far left and Eurosceptic parties in Europe. Retrieved from https://popu-listorg.
37.
RussmannUSocial media as strategic campaign tool: Austrian political parties use of social media over time. In: TarasDDaviesR (eds) Electoral Campaigns, Media, and the New World of Digital Politics. Michigan University Press, 263–282.
38.
SalojarviV (2019) Populism in journalistic photographs: political leaders in Venezuelan newspaper images. Iberoamericana – Nordic Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies48(1): 28–39.
39.
SchertzerRWoodsE (2021) #Nationalism: the ethno-nationalist populism of Donald Trump’s Twitter communication. Ethnic and Racial Studies44(7): 1154–1173.
40.
TenscherJKoc-MichalskaKLillekerDG, et al. (2016) The professionals speak: practitioners’ perspectives on professional election campaigning. European Journal of Communication31(2): 95–119.
41.
VenetiAJacksonDLillekerD (eds) (2019) Visual Political Communication. Palgrave: Palgrave Macmillan.
42.
WettsteinMEsserFSchulzA, et al. (2018) News media as gatekeepers, critics, and initiators of populist communication: how journalists in ten countries deal with the populist challenge. The International Journal of Press/Politics23(4): 476–495.
43.
WodakRForchtnerB (2014) Embattled Vienna 1683/2010: right-wing populism, collective memory and the fictionalisation of politics. Visual Communication13(2): 231–255.
44.
ZelizerB (2010) Journalism, memory, and the voice of the visual. In: ZelizerB (ed) About to Die: How News Images Move the Public. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.1–27.
45.
ZoonenLv (2005) Entertaining the Citizen: When Politics and Popular Culture Converge. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
