Public and commercial news follow distinct logics. We evaluate this duality in television news coverage on immigration. First, by means of a large-scale content analysis of Flemish television news (N = 1630), we investigate whether immigration coverage diverges between both broadcasters. Results show that, despite an overall negativity bias and relative homogeneity between the broadcasters, commercial news contains slightly more sensational and tabloid characteristics than public news. The latter promotes a more balanced view of immigration. These differences are stable over time. Second, using cross-sectional and panel data, we assess whether a preference for public versus commercial news is associated with an attitudinal gap in anti-immigrant attitudes. Findings demonstrate that individuals who prefer commercial news are more negative towards immigrants. We suggest that differences in news content may explain this attitudinal gap. In light of the debate around ‘public value’ offered by public service media across Europe, we tentatively conclude that public broadcasters have the potential to foster tolerance and provide balanced information by prioritizing a normative view over a market logic. The linkage between news coverage and the gap in attitudes between commercial and public news viewers warrants closer investigation in the future.
AartsKSemetkoHA (2003) The divided electorate: Media use and political involvement. Journal of Politics65(3): 759–784.
2.
AwadI (2008) Cultural diversity in the news media: A democratic or commercial need?Javnost-The Public16(4): 55–72.
3.
BardoelJLHd’HaenensL (2008) Converging PSB policies in Western Europe: The Netherlands and Flanders compared. Journal of Global Mass Communication1(3–4): 190–209.
4.
BaumMAJamisonAS (2008) The Oprah effect: How soft news helps inattentive citizens vote consistently. Journal of Politics68(4): 946–959.
5.
BekMG (2004) Research note: Tabloidization of news media. An analysis of television news in Turkey. European Journal of Communication19(3): 371–386.
6.
BensonR (2002) The political/literary model of French journalism: Change and continuity in immigration news coverage, 1973–1991. Journal of European Area Studies10(1): 49–70.
7.
BlumlerJGGurevitchM (1995) The Crisis of Public Communication. London: Routledge.
8.
BoomgaardenHGVliegenthartR (2009) How news content influences anti-immigration attitudes: Germany, 1993–2005. European Journal of Political Research48(4): 516–542.
9.
CEC (1997) Protocol on the System of Public Broadcasting in the Member States Attached to the Treaty of Amsterdam, C 340/109. Brussels: CEC.
DahlgrenPSparksC (1992) Journalism and Popular Culture. London: SAGE.
12.
DassonnevilleRFalk PedersenEGriebA. (2014) Belgian Election Panel 2009–2014. Technical Report, University of Leuven, Leuven, October.
13.
De SmedtJWoutersRDe SwertK (2013) Inter-Coder Reliability in the TV News Archive. A Report on Coding Issues, Countries and Actors in Belgian Television News. Antwerp: Steunpunt Media.
14.
d’HaenensLMattelartT (2011) Media and ethnic minorities. In: TrappelWMeierLd’HaenensL. (eds) Media in Europe Today. Bristol: Intellect Ltd., pp. 235–250.
15.
d’HaenensLSousaHHulténO (2011) From public broadcasting to public service media. In: TrappelJMeierWD’HaenensL. (eds) Media in Europe Today. Bristol: Intellect Ltd., pp. 185–218.
16.
EsserF (1999) Tabloidization’ of news: A comparative analysis of Anglo-American and German press journalism. European Journal of Communication14(3): 291–324.
17.
GrabeMEZhouSBarnettB (2001) Explicating sensationalism in television news: Content and the bells and whistles of form. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media45(4): 635–655.
18.
HallinDCManciniP (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Hendriks VettehenPNuijtenKBeentjesJ (2005) News in an age of competition: The case of sensationalism in Dutch television news, 1995–2001. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media49(3): 282–295.
20.
Hendriks VettehenPZhouSKleemansM. (2012) Competitive pressure and arousing television news: A cross-cultural study. Asian Journal of Communication22(2): 179–196.
21.
Holtz-BachaCNorrisP (2001) ‘To entertain, inform, and educate’: Still the role of public television. Political Communication18(2): 123–140.
22.
HoogheM (2002) Watching television and civic engagement: Disentangling the effects of time, programs, and stations. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics7(2): 84–104.
23.
IyengarS (1991) Is Anyone Responsible. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
24.
IyengarS (2009) Absence of diversity: Market-based journalism, vote-seeking candidates, and racial cues in media programming. In: MarkusHMoyaP (eds) Race and Culture in the 21st Century. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, pp. 251–273.
25.
KleemansMVan CauwenbergeAd’HaenensL. (2008) Op zoek naar verklaringen voor sensatie in het nieuws: Een vergelijking tussen Nederlandse, Vlaamse, Waalse en Franse televisiejournaals. [Looking for explanations for sensation in the news: A comparison between Dutch, Flemish, Walloon and French television newscasts]. Tijdschrift Voor Communicatiewetenschap36(4): 301–319.
26.
LowryDTNioTCJLeitnerDW (2003) Setting the public fear agenda: A longitudinal analysis of network TV crime reporting, public perceptions of crime, and FBI crime statistics. Journal of Communication53(1): 61–73.
27.
MackieDMSmithERRayDG (2008) Intergroup emotions and intergroup relations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass2(5): 1866–1880.
28.
McLachlanSGoldingP (2000) Tabloidization in the British press: A quantitative investigation into changes in British newspapers 1952–1997. In: SparksCTullochJ (eds) Tabloid Tales: Global Debates over Media Standards. Lanham, MD; Boulder, CO; New York; Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 75–90.
29.
NorrisP (2000) A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
PanttiM (2010) The value of emotion: An examination of television journalists’ notions on emotionality. European Journal of Communication25(2): 168–181.
31.
RogersJO’BoyleNPrestonP. (2014) The significance of small differences: Cultural diversity and broadcasting in Ireland. European Journal of Communication29(4): 399–415.
32.
SchemerC (2014) Media effects on racial attitudes: Evidence from a three-wave panel survey in a political campaign. International Journal of Public Opinion Research26(4): 531–542.
33.
SchlueterEDavidovE (2013) Contextual sources of perceived group threat: Negative immigration-related news reports, immigrant group size and their interaction, Spain 1996–2007. European Sociological Review29(2): 179–191.
34.
Schmitt-BeckRWolsingA (2010) European TV environments and citizens’ social trust: Evidence from multilevel analyses. Communications35(4): 461–483.
35.
SchuckARTVliegenthartRde VreeseCH (2015) Matching theory and data: Why combining media content with survey data matters. British Journal of Political Science46: 1–9.
36.
SlatteryKDoremusMMarcusL (2001) Shifts in public affairs reporting on the network evening news: A move toward the sensational. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media45(2): 290–302.
37.
SparksCTullochJ (2000) Tabloid Tales: Global Debates over Media Standards (ed SparksCTullochJ). Lanham, MD; Boulder, CO; New York; Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
38.
StrömbäckJShehataA (2010) Media malaise or a virtuous circle? Exploring the causal relationships between news media exposure, political news attention and political interest. European Journal of Political Research49(5): 575–597.
39.
SyvertsenT (2003) Challenges to public television in the era of convergence and commercialization. Television & New Media4(2): 155–175.
40.
Ter WalJd’HaenensLKoemanJ (2005) (Re)presentation of ethnicity in EU and Dutch domestic news: A quantitative analysis. Media, Culture & Society27(6): 937–950.
41.
ThomassBHallvardMd’HaenensL (2015) Renewing public service media remit. In: TrappelJSteemersJThomassB (eds) European Media in Crisis: Values, Risks and Policies. London: Routledge, pp. 182–199.
42.
UribeRGunterB (2007) Are ‘sensational’ news stories more likely to trigger viewers’ emotions than non-sensational news stories? A content analysis of British TV news. European Journal of Criminology22(2): 207–228.
43.
Van den BulckHBroosD (2011) Can a charter make the difference in ethnic minority reporting? A comparative content and production analysis of two Flemish television newscast. Communications36(2): 195–216.
44.
Van KlingerenMBoomgaardenHGVliegenthartR. (2014) Real world is not enough: The media as an additional source of negative attitudes toward immigration, comparing Denmark and the Netherlands. European Sociological Review31: 1–16.
45.
ZhouYMoyP (2007) Parsing framing processes: The interplay between online public and media coverage. Journal of Communication57: 79–98.
