Political communication is crucial for opinion formation about any kind of political issue. According to arguments in the literature on the local public sphere and in political science, processes of communication and opinion formation differ at the local and national levels. However, opinion formation about national and local issues has yet to be compared systematically. This study analyses differences in the communication processes at the local and national levels in Germany based on a survey (n = 1014). The results demonstrate that opinions about local and national issues are predisposed, and hardly any media effects occur. Respondents’ opinions about local issues are formed more systematically, and interpersonal discussions can be influential while opinions about national issues are based less on personal relevance. In sum, opinion formation processes differ at local and national levels but not always in the way it is often assumed in the existing literature.
BachlMVögeleC (2013) Education policy in the televised debate before the state election 2011 in Baden-Württemberg. Studies in Communication|Media2(3): 367–395.
2.
BaugutPReinemannC (2013) Taking stock and outlook: The analysis of political communication cultures as a way out of the crises in local communication research?Studies in Communication|Media2(3): 401–429.
3.
BeckerLBWhitneyDC (1980) Effects of media dependencies: Audience assessment of government. Communication Research7(1): 95–120.
4.
BowlerSDonovanT (1998) Demanding Choices. Opinion, Voting and Direct Democracy. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
5.
ChristinTHugSSciariniP (2002) Interests and information in referendum voting: An analysis of Swiss Voters. European Journal of Political Research41: 759–776.
6.
De VreeseCH (2007) The Dynamics of Referendum Campaigns. An International Perspective. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
EaglyAHChaikenS (1993) The Psychology of Attitudes. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
8.
ElvestadE (2009) Introverted locals or world citizens? A quantitative study of interest in local and foreign news in traditional media and on the Internet. Nordicom Review20(2): 105–123.
9.
European Commission (2009) Annex, 70. Eurobarometer Fall 2008. Brussels: European Commission.
10.
EvelandWPJ (2004) The effect of political discussion in producing informed citizens: The roles of information, motivation, and elaboration. Political Communication21(2): 177–193.
11.
GabrielOWBrettschneiderF (1997) Werte, Ideologien und Politikpräferenzen [Values, ideologies and political preferences]. In: GabrielOWBrettschneiderFVetterA (Eds.) Politische Kultur und Wahlverhalten in einer Großstadt [Political culture and voter behavior in a large city]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 43-68.
12.
GrossKAdayS (2003) The scary world in your living room and neighborhood: Using local broadcast news, neighborhood crime rates, and personal experience to test agenda setting and cultivation. Journal of Communication53(3): 411–426.
13.
HasebrinkUSchmidtJH (2012) Informationsrepertoires der deutschen Bevölkerung [Information Repertoires of German Citizens]. Hamburg: Verlag Hans-Bredow-Institut.
14.
HesterJBGibsonR (2007) The agenda-setting function of national versus local media: A time-series analysis for the issue of same-sex marriage. Mass Communication & Society10(3): 299–317.
15.
HoboltSB (2007) Taking cues on Europe? Voter competence and party endorsements in referendums on European integration. European Journal of Political Research46: 151–182.
16.
HuLTBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling6(1): 1-55.
17.
KriesiH (2005) Direct Democratic Choice: The Swiss Experience. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
18.
KriesiH (2012a) Political Communication in Direct Democratic Campaigns. Enlightening or Manipulating?Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
19.
KriesiH (2012b) The role of predispositions. In: KriesiH (ed.) Political Communication in Direct Democratic Campaigns. Enlightening or Manipulating?Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 143–167.
20.
LangS (2000) NGOs, local governance, and political communication in Germany. Political Communication17(4): 383–387.
21.
LangS (2003) Lokale politische Kommunikation: Öffentlichkeit im Spannungsfeld nationaler und globaler Entwicklungen [Local political communication: The public sphere between national and global developments]. In: EsserFPfetschB (eds) Politische Kommunikation im internationalen Vergleich. Grundlagen, Anwendungen, Perspektiven [International Comparison of Political Communication. Basics, Applications and Perspectives]. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 179–207.
22.
LenartS (1994) Shaping Political Attitudes. The Impact of Interpersonal Communication and Mass Media. Thousand Oaks, CA; London; New Delhi: SAGE.
23.
LijphartA (1997) Unequal participation: Democracy’s unresolved dilemma. The American Political Science Review91(1): 1–14.
24.
LupiaA (1994) Shortcuts versus Encyclopedias: Information and voting behaviour in California insurance reform elections. American Political Science Review88(1): 63–76.
25.
McLeodJMDailyKGuoZ. (1996) Community integration, local media use, and democratic processes. Communication Research23(2): 179–209.
26.
McLeodJMScheufeleDAMoyP (1999) Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political Communication16(3): 315–336.
27.
MarcinkowskiF (2001) Die Lokalpresse im Kontext kommunaler Wahlkämpfe. Eine Fallstudie aus Nordrhein-Westfalen [The local press in the context of local election campaigns. A case study from North Rhine-Westphalia]. In: AbromeitHNielandJUSchierlT (eds) Politik, Medien, Technik [Politics, Media, Technology]. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 260–277.
28.
MetagJ (2013) Lokal kompetenter? Einflüsse von Kommunikations- und Informations verarbeitungsprozessen auf die Kompetenz bei lokal- und bundespolitischen Entscheidungen [More competent at local level? The impact of mass media, interpersonal communication, and information processing on competence about local and national issues.]. SCM – Studies in Communication | Media2(3): 335–365.
29.
MetagJ (2014) Politische Kommunikation in lokalen und nationalen Öffentlichkeiten. Ein Vergleich der Rezeptions- und Meinungsbildungsprozesse [Political Communication at Local and National Levels. A Comparison of Media Effects and Opinion Formation Processes]. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
30.
MoyPMcCluskeyMRKelleyM. (2004) Political correlates of local news media use. Journal of Communication54(3): 532–546.
31.
PaletzDLReichertPMcIntyreB (1971) How the media support local governmental authority. Public Opinion Quarterly35(1): 80–92.
32.
PalmgreenPClarkeP (1977) Agenda-setting with local and national issues. Communication Research4(4): 435–452.
33.
RoßteuscherSSchererP (2013) Wertorientierungen [Value orientations]. In: Van DethJWTausendpfundM (eds) Politik im Kontext: Ist alle Politik lokale Politik? [Politics in Context: Is All Politics Local Politics?] Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 67–91.
SchillerT (2007) Direkte Demokratie auf Bundesländer- und Kommunalebene [Direct democracy at national and municipal level]. In: FreitagMWagschalU (Eds.) Direkte Demokratie. Bestandsaufnahmen und Wirkungen im internationalen Vergleich [Direct democracy. State of research and effects in an international comparative perspective]. Berlin: Lit Verlag, pp. 115-150.
36.
SeligJPPreacherKJ (2008) Monte Carlo Method for Assessing Mediation: An Interactive Tool for Creating Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects [Computer software]. Available at: http://quantpsy.org/ (accessed 28 August 2012).
37.
ShakerL (2009) Citizens’ local political knowledge and the role of media access. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly86(4): 809–826.
38.
StroudNJ (2010) Polarization and Partisan Selective Exposure. Journal of Communication, 60(3): 556-576.
39.
TenscherJSeeberGHallermeyerM (2013) Politische Mediennutzung [Political media use]. In: Van DethJWTausendpfundM (eds) Politik im Kontext: Ist alle Politik lokale Politik? [Politics in Context: Is All Politics Local Politics?] Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 191–214.
40.
Van DethJWTausendpfundM (2013) Politik im Kontext: Ist alle Politik lokale Politik? [Politics in Context: Is All Politics Local Politics?] Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
41.
VetterA (2011) Lokale Politik als Rettungsanker der Demokratie [Local politics as the anchor of democracy]. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte7–8: 25–32.
42.
ZallerJR (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
