Digital literacy and inclusion have been two important, largely separate, areas of study that examine the relationships between Internet skills and engagement. This article brings together these areas of research by testing a model that assumes specific pathways to inclusion: specific sociodemographic factors predict specific digital skills and specific digital skills predict related types of engagement with the Internet. Analyses of nationally representative survey data of Internet use in Britain highlight considerable measurement and conceptual challenges that complicate digital literacy research. The findings suggest that linking literacy and exclusion frameworks allows for a more nuanced understanding of digital engagement. Different groups lacked different skills, which related to how their engagement with the Internet varied.
BaHTallyWTsikalasK (2002) Investigating children’s emerging digital literacies. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment1(4): 1–49.
2.
BanduraA (1982) Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist37(2): 122–147.
3.
BroosARoeK (2006) The digital divide in the playstation generation: Self-efficacy, locus of control and ICT adoption among adolescents. Poetics34(4–5): 306–317.
4.
BuckinghamD (2007) Digital media literacies: Rethinking media education in the age of the internet research. Comparative and International Education2(1): 43–55.
5.
CheongPH (2008) The young and techless? Investigating internet use and problem-solving behaviors of young adults in Singapore. New Media and Society10(5): 771–801.
6.
De HaanJRijkenS (2002) The digital divide in the Netherlands: The influence of material, cognitive and social resources on the possession and use of ICTs. Electronic Journal of Communication12(1–2). Available at: www.cios.org/EJCPUBLIC/012/1/01215.html.
7.
DuttonWBlankG (2011) The 2011 OxIS Survey: The Internet in Britain. Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford.
8.
Eshet-AlkaliYAmichai-HamburgerY (2004) Experiments in digital literacy. Cyberpsychology and Behavior7(4): 421–429.
9.
EynonRMalmbergL-E (2012) Understanding the online information seeking behaviours of young people: The role of networks of support. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning28(6): 514–529.
10.
GilsterP (1997) Digital Literacy. London: John Wiley and Sons.
11.
GreenoJGCollinsAMResnickLB (1996) Cognition and learning. In: BerlinerDCalfeeR (eds) Handbook of Educational Psychology. New York: Macmillan, pp. 15–41.
12.
HaddonL (2000) Social exclusion and information and communication technologies: Lessons from studies of single parents and the young elderly. New Media and Society2(4): 387–406.
13.
HalfordSSavageM (2010) Reconceptualizing digital social inequality. Information, Communication and Society13(7): 937–955.
14.
HargittaiE (2005) Survey measures of web-oriented digital literacy. Social Science Computer Review23(3): 371–379.
15.
HargittaiEHinnantA (2008) Digital inequality: Differences in young adults’ use of the Internet. Communication Research35(5): 602–621.
16.
HelsperEJ (2012) A corresponding fields model of the links between digital and social exclusion. Communication Theory22(4): 403–426.
17.
HuLBentlerP (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Coventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling6(1): 1–55.
18.
HughesMEWaiteLJHawkleyLCCacioppoJT (2004) A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys: Results from two population-based study. Research on Aging26(6): 655–672.
19.
JungJYQiuJLKimYC (2001) Internet connectedness and inequality: Beyond the ‘divide’. Communication Research28(4): 507–535.
20.
LankshearCKnobelM (2008) Digital Literacies: Concepts, Policies and Practices. New York: Peter Lang.
21.
LivingstoneS (2004) Media literacy and the challenge of new information and communication technologies. The Communication Review1(7): 3–14.
22.
LivingstoneS (2008) Engaging with media – a matter of literacy?Communication, Culture and Critique1(1): 51–62.
23.
LivingstoneSHelsperE (2007) Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media and Society9(4): 671–696.
24.
MehraBMerkelCPeterson-BishopA (2004) The internet for empowerment of minority and marginalized users. New Media and Society6(6): 781–802.
25.
PeterJValkenburgPMSchoutenAP (2006) Characteristics and motives of adolescents talking with strangers on the internet. Cyberpsychology and Behavior9(5): 526–530.
26.
SelwynN (2004) Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media and Society6(3): 341–362.
27.
Van DeursenAJAM (2010) Internet Skills, Vital Assets in an Information Society. Enschede, the Netherlands: Twente University.
28.
Van DeursenAJAMVan DijkJAGM (2008) Measuring digital skills. Performance tests of operational, formal, information and strategic Internet skills among the Dutch population. In: ICA Conference, Montreal, 22–26 May.
29.
Van DeursenAJAMVan DijkJAGM (2009) Improving digital skills for the use of online public information and services. Government Information Quarterly26(2): 333–340.
30.
Van DijkJAGM (2005) The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
WellmanBHaaseAQWitteJHamptonK (2001) Does the internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital?American Behavioral Scientist45(3): 436–455.
