This study focuses on interpersonal communication in the family and among peers in order to empirically examine the general idea that everyday civic talk might develop young people’s civic orientation. Two questions are addressed: (1) What is the significance of civic talk in relation to key dimensions of young people’s civic orientation? (2) What does civic talk in peer settings specifically contribute to young people’s civic orientation? The study is based on survey data from high school students and their parents (N = 1148). The findings offer clear support to the idea that civic talk in everyday contexts matters for young people’s development of political knowledge, democratic values and different forms of civic practices. Civic talk in peer settings contributes uniquely to all dimensions of youths’ civic orientation. Implications of the findings for political socialization research and theories of the democratic mechanisms of civic talk are discussed.
AmnåEEkströmMKerrMStattinH (2009) Political socialization and human agency: The development of civic engagement from adolescence to adulthood. Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift111(1): 27–40.
2.
BarberB (1984) Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3.
BennettWLWellsCRankA (2009) Young citizens and civic learning: Two paradigms of citizenship in the digital age. Citizenship Studies13(2): 105–120.
4.
ChaffeeSMcLeodJMWackmanD (1973) Family communication patterns and adolescent political participation. In: DennisJ (ed.) Socialization to Politics: Selected Readings. New York: Wiley, pp. 349–364.
5.
ConoverPJSearingDDCreweIM (2002) The deliberative potential of political discussion. British Journal of Political Science32(1): 21–62.
6.
DahlgrenP (2006) Doing citizenship: The cultural origins of civic agency in the public sphere. European Journal of Cultural Studies9(3): 267–286.
7.
DahlgrenP (2009) Media and Political Engagement: Citizens, Communication and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Delli CarpiniMXKeeterS (1996) What Americans Know about Politics and Why it Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
DutwinD (2003) The character of deliberation: Equality, argument, and the formation of public opinion. International Journal of Public Opinion Review15(3): 239–263.
10.
EliasophN (1998) Avoiding Politics: How Americans Produce Apathy in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
EvelandWPJr (2004) The effect of political discussion in producing informed citizens: The roles of information, motivation and elaboration. Political Communication21(2): 177–193.
12.
EvelandWPJrHivelyMH (2009) Political discussion frequency, network size, and ‘heterogeneity’ of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication59(2): 205–224.
13.
HabermasJ (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.
14.
HabermasJ (1993 [1962]) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
HivelyMHEvelandWPJr (2009) Contextual antecedents and political consequences of adolescent political discussion, discussion elaboration, and network diversity. Political Communication26(1): 30–47.
16.
JenningsMKNiemiRG (1968) The transmission of political values from parent to child. American Political Science Review62: 169–184.
17.
KimJKimEJ (2008) Theorizing dialogical deliberation: Everyday political talk as communicative action and dialogue. Communication Theory18(1): 51–70.
18.
KimJWyattROKatzE (1999) News, talk, opinion, participation: The part played by conversation in deliberative democracy. Political Communication16(4): 361–385.
19.
KiousisSMcDevittM (2008) Agenda setting in civic development: Effects of curricula and issue importance on youth voter turnout. Communication Research35(4): 481–502.
20.
KwakNWilliamsAEWangXLeeH (2005) Talking politics and engaging politics: An examination of the relationships between structural features of political talk and discussion engagement. Communication Research32(1): 87–111.
21.
McDevittM (2005) The partisan child: Developmental provocation as a model of political socialization. International Journal of Public Opinion Research18(1): 67–88.
22.
McDevittMChaffeeS (2002) From top-down to trickle-up influence: Revisiting assumptions about the family in political socialization. Political Communication19(3): 281–301.
23.
McDevittMKiousisS (2007) The red and blue of adolescence: Origins of the compliant voter and the defiant activist. American Behavioral Scientist50(9): 1214–1230.
24.
McLeodJShahD (2009) Communication and political socialization: Challenges and opportunities for research. Political Communication26(1): 1–10.
25.
NieNHJunnJStehlik-BarryK (1996) Education and Democratic Citizenship in America. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
26.
NisbetMCSheufeleDA (2004) Political talk as a catalyst for online citizenship. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly81(4): 877–896.
27.
PasquierD (2008) From parental control to peer pressure: Cultural transmission and conformism. In: DrotnerKLivingstoneS (eds) The International Handbook of Children, Media and Culture. London: Sage, pp. 448–459.
28.
PolatRK (2005) The internet and political participation: Exploring the explanatory links. European Journal of Communication20(4): 435–459.
29.
RyfeDM (2005) Does deliberative democracy work?Annual Review of Political Science8: 49–71.
30.
SearingDDSoltFConoverPJCreweI (2007) Public discussion in the deliberative system: Does it make better citizens?British Journal of Political Science37(4): 587–618.
