This article studies trends in gender inequality in the domain of fiction books between 1960 and 2009 in France, Germany and the United States by analysing bestseller lists and literary award winners. It is argued that gender inequality is larger in fields or genres where more status is at stake for individual agents, as this causes an influx of men who then ‘edge’ women out of the field. The study finds evidence for this mechanism, as the presence of female authors in bestseller lists (exponent of the popular culture system) is larger than that among literary award winners (highbrow culture system) in all three countries. Cross-national differences are consistent (US smallest inequality, France largest), emphasizing the importance of field characteristics in explaining social inequalities in cultural production.
AllenMPLincolnAE (2004) Critical discourse and the cultural consecration of American films. Social Forces82(3): 871–894.
2.
AnandNPetersonRA (2000) When market information constitutes fields: Sensemaking of markets in the commercial music industry. Organization Science11(3): 270–284.
3.
AnheierHKGerhardsJ (1991) Literary myths and social structure. Social Forces69(3): 811–830.
4.
BaytonM (1998) Frock Rock. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
BeckerH (1982) Art Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
BeversT (2005) Cultural education and the canon: A comparative analysis of the content of secondary school exams for music and art in England, France, Germany, and the Netherlands, 1990–2004. Poetics33: 388–416.
8.
BielbyWTBielbyDD (1992) Cumulative versus continuous disadvantage in an unstructured labor market. Work and Occupations19: 366–489.
9.
BielbyWTBielbyDD (1994) ‘All hits are flukes’: Institutionalized decision making and the rhetoric of network prime-time program development. American Journal of Sociology99: 1287–1313.
10.
BielbyDDBielbyWT (1996) Women and men in film: Gender inequality among writers in a culture industry. Gender and Society10(3): 248–270.
11.
BourdieuP (1993) The Field of Cultural Production. New York: Columbia University Press.
12.
CavesRE (2000) Creative Industries: Contracts between Art and Commerce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
ClarkPP (1979) Literary culture in France and the United States. American Journal of Sociology84: 1057–1077.
14.
CorseSWesterveltSD (2002) Gender and literary valorization: The awakening of a canonical novel. Social Perspectives45(2): 139–161.
15.
CoulangeonPRavetHRoharikI (2005) Gender differentiated effect of time in performing art professions: Musicians, actors and dancers in contemporary France. Poetics33: 369–387.
16.
CurranJ (2000) Literary editors, social networks and cultural tradition. In: CurranJ (ed.) Media Organizations in Society. London: Arnold, pp. 215–239.
17.
DiMaggioP (1991) Social structure, institutions, and cultural goods: The case of the United States. In: BourdieuPColemanJS (eds) Social Theory for a Changing Society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 133–155.
18.
DowdTJ (2004) Concentration and diversity revisited: Production logics and the U.S. mainstream recording industry, 1940–1990. Social Forces82(4): 1411–1455.
19.
DowdTJLiddleKBlylerM (2005) Charting gender: The success of female acts in the U.S. mainstream recording market, 1940–1990. Research in the Sociology of Organizations23: 81–123.
20.
EnglishJF (2005) The Economy of Prestige: Prizes, Awards and the Circulation of Cultural Value. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
FohrbeckKWiesandAJ (1972) Der Autorenreport. Hamburg: Rowohlt.
22.
GrecoANRodríguezCEWhartonRM (2007) The Culture and Commerce of Publishing in the 21st Century. Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books.
23.
GriswoldW (2008) Regionalism and the Reading Class. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
HesmondhalghD (2006) Bourdieu, the media and cultural production. Media, Culture and Society28(2): 211–231.
26.
HesmondhalghD (2007) The Cultural Industries, 2nd edn.London: Sage.
27.
JanssenSKuipersGVerboordM (2008) Cultural globalization and arts journalism. American Sociological Review73(5): 719–740.
28.
JanssenSVerboordMKuipersG (2011) Comparing cultural classification: High and popular arts in European and U.S. elite newspapers, 1955–2005, In: RösselJOtteG (eds) Life Style Research. Special issue 51 of Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie (KZfSS), pp. 139–168.
29.
KuipersG (2011) Cultural globalization as the emergence of a transnational cultural field: Transnational television and national media landscapes in four European countries. American Behavioral Scientist55(5): 541–557.
30.
LamontM (1992) Money, Morals and Matters. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
31.
LamontMThévenotL (eds) (2000) Rethinking Comparative Cultural Sociology: Repertoires of Evaluation in France and the United States. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
32.
LauzenMMDozierDClevelandE (2008) Constructing gender stereotypes through social roles in prime-time television. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media52(2): 200–214.
33.
LivingstoneS (2003) On the challenges of cross-national comparative media research. European Journal of Communication18(4): 477–500.
34.
LizardoOSkilesS (2009) Highbrow omnivorousness on the small screen? Cultural industry systems and patterns of cultural choice in Europe. Poetics37: 1–23.
35.
MillerL (2000) The best-seller list as marketing tool and historical fiction. Book History3: 286–304.
36.
MoranJ (1997) The role of multimedia conglomerates in American trade book publishing. Media, Culture and Society19(3): 441–455.
37.
NaudierD (2002) L’ecriture-femme, une innovation esthetique emblematique. Sociétés Contemporaines44: 57–73.
PetersonRAKernRM (1996) Changing highbrow taste: From snob to omnivore. American Sociological Review61: 900–907.
40.
RadwayJ (1984) Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy and Popular Culture. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
41.
RossKByerlyCM (eds) (2004) Women and Media: International Perspectives. Oxford: Blackwell.
42.
SapiroG (2009) Mondialisation et diversité culturelle: Les enjeux de la circulation transnationale des livres. In: SapiroG (eds) Les Contradictions de la Globalisation Éditorale. Paris: Nouveau Monde editions, pp. 275–301.
43.
SchmutzV (2009) Social and symbolic boundaries in newspaper coverage of music, 1955–2005: Gender and genre in the US, France, Germany and the Netherlands. Poetics37: 298–314.
44.
SchmutzVFaupelA (2010) Gender and cultural consecration in popular music. Social Forces89(2): 685–708.
45.
ShowalterE (2010) A Jury of Her Peers: American Women Writers from Anne Bradstreet to Annie Proulx. New York: Random House.
46.
StreetJ (2005) ‘Showbusiness of a serious kind’: A cultural politics of the arts prize. Media, Culture and Society27(6): 819–840.
47.
TepperS (2000) Fiction reading in America: Explaining the gender gap. Poetics27: 255–275.
48.
ThompsonJB (2010) Merchants of Culture: The Publishing Business in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Polity Press.
49.
TuchmanGFortinNE (1984), Fame and misfortune: Edging women out of the great literary tradition. American Journal of Sociology90(1): 72–96.
50.
Van ZoonenL (1994) Feminist Media Studies. London: Sage.
51.
Van ZoonenL (2004) Media, Cultuur & Burgerschap. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.
52.
VerboordM (2010) The legitimacy of book critics in the age of the Internet and omnivorousness: Expert critics, Internet critics and peer critics in Flanders and the Netherlands. European Sociological Review26: 623–637.
53.
VerboordM (2011) Cultural products go online: Comparing the Internet and print media on distributions of gender, genre and commercial success. Communications36: 441–462.
54.
VogelM (2001) Baard boven Baard. Over het Nederlandse Literaire en Maatschappelijke Leven 1945–1960. Amsterdam: Van Gennep.
55.
VosL (2008) Uitzondering op de Regel. De positie van Vrouwelijke Auteurs in het Naoorlogse Nederlandse Literaire Veld. Groningen: Dissertation Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
56.
Women in Publishing (1987) Reviewing the Reviews: A Woman’s Place on the Book Page. London: Journeyman Press.
57.
WeberD (2000) Culture of commerce? Symbolic boundaries in French and American book publishing. In: LamontMThévenotL (eds) Rethinking Comparative Cultural Sociology: Repertoires of Evaluation in France and the United States. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 127–147.
