Combining citations and network analysis, this study examines information flows between 10 European elite newspapers from 2000 to 2009 and identifies this network’s most central actors, sub-groups and structural features. At the same time, the article contributes to the literature with an alternative and network approach to the study of the European public sphere. Results indicate that The Times and The Guardian are the most quoted by other foreign newspapers, while the top monitors of information are The Guardian and El País. A longitudinal analysis of structural network metrics indicates a less dense but more inclusive information exchange that can be interpreted as sign of a qualitative transformation of the European communication space in the direction of a horizontal integration.
BruggemannMKleinen-von KonigslowK (2009) ‘Let’s talk about Europe’: Why Europeanization shows a different face in different newspapers. European Journal of Communication24(1): 27–48.
2.
CastellsM (1997) The Rise of the Network Society. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
3.
EderK (2000) Zur Transformation nationalstaatlicher Offentlichkeit in Europa. Von der Sprachgemeinschaft zur issuespezifischen Kommunikationsgemeinschaft. Berliner Journal fur Soziologie10(2): 167–184.
4.
EderKKantnerC (2000) Transnationale Resonanzstrukturen in Europa. Eine Kritik der Rede vom Offentlichkeitsdefixit. In: BachM (ed.) Die Europaisierung nationaler Gesellschaften. Sonderheft 40 der Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. Wiesbadem: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 306–331.
5.
ErbeJ (2005) What do the papers say? How press-reviews link national media arenas in Europe. Javnost–The Public12(2): 75–92.
6.
FraserN (2007) Transnationalizing the public sphere: On the legitimacy and efficacy of public opinion in a post-Westphalian world. Theory, Culture and Society24(4): 7–30.
7.
GehardsJ (2002) Das Öffentlichkeitsdefizit der EU im Horizont normativer Öffentlichkeitstheorien. In: KaelbleHKirschMSchmidt-GermigA (eds) Transnational Offentlichkeiten und Identitaten im 20. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
8.
JacksonMH (1997) Assessing the structure of communication on the World Wide Web. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication3(1).
9.
JaffeABTrajtenbergMHendersonR (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics108(3): 577–598.
10.
KoopmansR (2004) Integrated report ‘Analysis of political claims in European print media’. Fifth Framework Programme of the European Commission: the Transformation of Political Mobilisation and Communication in European Public Spheres. Available at: europub.wz-berlin.de.
11.
KoopmansRErbeJ (2004) Towards a European public sphere? Vertical and horizontal dimensions of Europeanised political communication. Innovation17(2): 97–118.
12.
Le BartC (2004) L’invention du lecteur européen. La revue de presse européenne d’Alex Taylor sur France Inter. In: MarchettiD. (ed.) En quête d’Europe. Médias européens et médiatisation de l’Europe. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes, pp. 203–229.
13.
MachillMBellerMFischerC (2006) Europe-topics in Europe’s media: The debate about the European public sphere: A meta-analysis of media content analyses. European Journal of Communication21(1): 57–88.
14.
MedranoJDGutierrezP (2001)Nested identities and European identity in Spain. Ethnic and Racial Studies24(5): 753–778.
15.
MeyerCO (2002) Europäische Öffentlichkeit als Kontrollsphäre: Die Europäische Kommission, die Medien und politische Verantwortlichkeit. Berlin: Vistas.
16.
NarinFHamiltonKSOlivastroD (1997) The increasing linkage between US technology and public science. Research Policy26: 317–330.
PetersB (2005) Public discourse, identity, and the problem of democratic legitimacy. In: EriksenEO (ed.) Making the European Polity: Reflexive Integration in the EU. London: Routledge.
19.
PirolliPCardSK (1999) Information foraging. Psychological Review106(4): 643–675.
20.
RisseT (2003) An emerging European public sphere? Theoretical clarifications and empirical indicators. In: Annual Meeting of the European Union Studies Association (EUSA), Nashville, TN, 27–30March. Available at: www.atasp.de/downloads/030322_europe_public.pdfUniversityPress.
21.
SchererHVesperS (2004) Was schreiben die Anderen? Ausländische Pressestimmen als Vorform paneuropäischer Öffentlichkeit – Eine Inhaltsanalyse deutscher Qualitätszeitungen. In: HagenLM (ed.) Europäische Union und mediale Öffentlichkeit. Theoretische Perspektiven und Befunde zur Rolle der Medien im europäischen Einigungsprozess. Köln: Halem, pp. 195–211.
22.
ScottJ (1992) Social Network Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23.
SievertH (1998) Europäischer Journalismus. Theorie und Empirie aktueller Medienkommunikation in der Europäischen Union. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
24.
StephensonKZelenM (1989) Rethinking centrality: Methods and examples. Social Networks11: 1–37.
25.
TrenzH-J (2004) Media coverage on European governance: Exploring the European public sphere in national quality newspapers. European Journal of Communication19(3): 291–319.
26.
Van de SteegM (2000) An analysis of the Dutch and Spanish newspaper debates on EU enlargement with Central and Eastern European countries: Suggestions for a transnational public sphere. In: BaernsBRauppJ (eds) Transnational Communication in Europe. Berlin: Vistas, pp. 61–87.
27.
WassermanSFaustK (1994) Social Network Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
