Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2011-12
Do audiences receive diverse ideas from news media? Exposure to a variety of news media and personal characteristics as determinants of diversity as received
Media policies in Europe traditionally promote a diverse media supply. This article investigates for the first time under what conditions audience members actually receive diversity. It focuses on the reception of diverse ideas on European integration from mainstream news media in Ireland and the Netherlands. Results show that exposure to a variety of media outlets predicts to some extent the reception of diverse ideas, especially for citizens with lower education. But interest and knowledge are better predictors. This indicates that policies that favour a diverse supply are necessary but not sufficient. New ideas are required to stimulate audiences to receive the diversity that is sent, especially in modern online societies.
BaumMGroelingT (2008) New media and the polarization of American political discourse. Political Communication25(4): 345–365.
2.
BeaudoinCE (2008) The internet’s impact on international knowledge. New Media and Society10(3): 455–474.
3.
BennettWL (1990) Toward a theory of press–state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication40(2): 103–125.
4.
BennettWLIyengarS (2008) A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication58(4): 707–731.
5.
ChaffeeSHSaphirMNGrafJSandvigCHahnKS (2001) Attention to counter-attitudinal messages in a state election campaign. Political Communication18(3): 247–272.
6.
CraigSCKaneJGGainousJ (2005) Issue-related learning in a gubernatorial campaign: A panel study. Political Communication22(4): 483–503.
7.
CurranJIyengarSLundABSalovaara-MoringI (2009) Media system, public knowledge and democracy: A comparative study. European Journal of Communication24(1): 5–26.
8.
De VreeseCHBoomgaardenH (2006) News, political knowledge and participation: The differential effects of news media exposure on political knowledge and participation. Acta Politica41(4): 317–341.
9.
De WaalESchoenbachK (2008) Presentation style and beyond: How print newspapers and online news expand awareness of public affairs issues. Mass Communication and Society11(2): 161–176.
10.
DruckmanJN (2005) Media matter: How newspapers and television news cover campaigns and influence voters. Political Communication22(4): 463–481.
11.
ElvestadEBlekesauneA (2008) Newspaper readers in Europe: A multilevel study of individual and national differences. European Journal of Communication23(4): 425–447.
12.
GarrettRK (2009) Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of Communication59(4): 676–699.
13.
GraberD (2003) The media and democracy: Beyond myths and stereotypes. Annual Review of Political Science6(1): 139–160.
14.
HallinDCManciniP (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
HansenGJBenoitWL (2007) Communication forms as predictors of issue knowledge in presidential campaigns: A meta-analytic assessment. Mass Communication and Society10(2): 189–210.
16.
HardyBScheufeleDWangZ (2005) Defining deliberation: Key determinants and distinct dimensions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New York, 26–30 05.
17.
HartWAlbarracinDEaglyAHBrechanILindbergMJMerrillL (2009) Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychological Bulletin135(4): 555–588.
18.
HeeterC (1985) Program selection with abundance of choice: A process model. Human Communication Research12(1): 126–152.
19.
HellmanH (2001) Diversity, an end in itself? Developing a multi-measure methodology of television programme variety studies. European Journal of Communication16(2): 181–208.
20.
IosifidesP (1999) Diversity versus concentration in the deregulated mass media domain. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly76(1): 152–162.
21.
JohnsonTJBichardSLZhangW (2009) Communication communities or ‘cyberghettos’? A path analysis model examining factors that explain selective exposure to blogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication15(1): 60–82.
22.
KimC-RR (2002) Identifying viewer segments for television programs. Journal of Advertising Research42(1): 51–66.
23.
KimYM (2009) Issue publics in the new information environment: Selectivity, domain specificity, and extremity. Communication Research36(2): 254–284.
24.
Knobloch-WesterwickSMengJ (2009) Looking the other way: Selective exposure to attitude-consistent and counterattitudinal political information. Communication Research36(3): 426–448.
25.
McLeodJMMcDonaldDG (1985) Beyond simple exposure: Media orientations and their impact on political processes. Communication Research12(1): 3–33.
26.
McQuailD (1992) Media Performance. London: Sage.
27.
McQuailD (2005) McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory. London: Sage.
28.
McQuailDVan CuilenburgJJ (1983) Diversity as a media policy goal. Gazette31(3): 145–162.
29.
MoreauFPeltierS (2004) Cultural diversity in the movie industry: A cross-national study. Journal of Media Economics17(2): 123–143.
30.
MutzDCMartinPS (2001) Facilitating communication across lines of political difference: The role of mass media. American Political Science Review95(1): 97–114.
31.
NapoliPM (1997) Rethinking program diversity assessment: An audience-centered approach. Journal of Media Economics10(4): 59–74.
32.
NapoliPM (1999) Deconstructing the diversity principle. Journal of Communication49(4): 7–34.
33.
NeuendorfKAAtkinDJJeffresLW (2001) Reconceptualizing channel repertoire in the urban cable environment. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media45(3): 464–482.
34.
NorrisPSandersD (2003) Message or medium?Campaign learning during the 2001 British general election. Political Communication20(3): 233–262.
35.
OwenBMWildmanSS (1992) Video Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36.
PortoMP (2007) Frame diversity and citizen competence: Towards a critical approach to news quality. Critical Studies in Media Communication24(4): 303–321.
37.
PriorM (2005) News vs entertainment: How increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge and turnout. American Journal of Political Science49(3): 577–592.
38.
RoesslerP (2008) Media content diversity: Conceptual issues and future directions for communications research. In: BeckCS (ed.) Communication Yearbook 31. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum, 464–520.
39.
SingerJB (2010) Norms and the network: Journalistic ethics in a shared media space. In: MeyersC (ed.) Journalism Ethics: A Philosophical Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 117–129.
40.
StroudNJ (2008) Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior30(3): 341–366.
41.
TewksburyD (2003) What do Americans really want to know? Tracking the behavior of news readers on the internet. Journal of Communication53(4): 694–710.
42.
ValentinoNABanksAJHutchingsVLDavisAK (2009) Selective exposure in the internet age: The interaction between anxiety and information utility. Political Psychology30(4): 591–613.
43.
Van CuilenburgJ (2007) Media diversity, competition and concentration: Concepts and theories. In: De BensE (ed.) Media between Commerce and Culture. Bristol: Intellect, 25–54.
44.
Van der WurffR (2004) Supplying and viewing diversity: The role of competition and viewer choice in Dutch broadcasting. European Journal of Communication19(2): 215–237.
45.
Van der WurffR (2005) Media markets and media diversity. Communications30(3): 293–301.
46.
WebsterJG (2005) Beneath the veneer of fragmentation: Television audience polarization in a multichannel world. Journal of Communication55(2): 366–382.
