Hydrogen embrittlement is a well-known surface-related phenomenon. Coating deposition using ceramic materials to resist hydrogen permeation is one of the promising solutions. This paper introduces an alternative wet deposition technique, namely electrophoretic deposition, to prepare aluminum oxide coatings onto metallic substrates. The main objective is to achieve compact alumina layers with as few pores and cracks as possible, showing good adhesion. The deposition of α-Al2O3 coating has been chosen due to the low hydrogen permeability of this material. The coating properties were adjusted by controlling the process parameters. The use of microstructure characterisation techniques allowed to assess the quality of the coatings, and to understand the processes involved in coating formation. Results show that the coating quality can be significantly improved by using proper suspension formulation. The resulting optimised coating delivers a uniform and homogeneous α-Al2O3 layer with low porosity and good adhesion to the substrate.
OsmanAIMehtaNElgarahyAM, et al.Hydrogen production, storage, utilisation and environmental impacts: a review. Environ Chem Lett2022; 20: 153–188.
2.
BarreraOBombacDChenY, et al.Understanding and mitigating hydrogen embrittlement of steels: a review of experimental, modelling and design progress from atomistic to continuum. J Mater Sci2018; 53: 6251–6290.
3.
LiYLiWZhuX, et al.Mechanism of improved hydrogen embrittlement resistance of low-temperature plasma carburised stainless steel. Sur Eng2018; 34: 189–192.
4.
BullSK. Atomic layer deposition of environmental barrier coatings for preventing hydrogen ingress. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado at Boulder, 2021.
5.
LaadelN-EEl MansoriMKangN, et al.Permeation barriers for hydrogen embrittlement prevention in metals: a review on mechanisms, materials suitability and efficiency. Int J Hydrogen Energy2022; 47: 32707–32731.
6.
XiaoSMengXShiK, et al.Hydrogen permeation barriers and preparation techniques: A review. J Vac Sci Technol A2022; 40(6): 060803-1–060803-12.
7.
LiYBarzagliFLiuP, et al.Mechanism and evaluation of hydrogen permeation barriers: a critical review. Ind Eng Chem Res2023; 62: 15752–15773.
8.
WetegroveMDuarteMJTaubeK, et al.Preventing hydrogen embrittlement: the role of barrier coatings for the hydrogen economy. Hydrogen2023; 4: 307–322.
9.
SchroerCLorenzJWedemeyerO, et al.Optimisation of ECX permeation barriers towards thicker alumina. Nucl Mater Energy2024; 38: 101581.
LiQWangJXiangQ-Y, et al.Study on influence factors of permeation reduction factor of Al2O3-hydrogen isotopes permeation barriers. Int J Hydrogen Energy2016; 41: 4326–4331.
12.
GopalanHRaoJPatilP, et al.Influence of electrochemical hydrogen charging on the mechanical, diffusional, and interfacial properties of an amorphous alumina coating on Fe-8 wt% Cr alloy. J Mater Res2024; 39: 1812–1821.
13.
LiSHeDLiuX, et al.Deuterium permeation of amorphous alumina coating on 316L prepared by MOCVD. J Nucl Mater2012; 420: 405–408.
14.
ZhengGCarpenterDDolanK, et al.Experimental investigation of alumina coating as tritium permeation barrier for molten salt nuclear reactors. Nucl Eng Des2019; 353: 110232.
15.
LiHKeZXueL, et al.A novel low-temperature approach for fabricating α-Al2O3-based ceramic coating as tritium permeation barrier. Fusion Eng Des2017; 125: 567–572.
16.
LiuY-LYangT-TLuoL-M, et al.Preparation and characterization of SiO2/α-Al2O3 tritium permeation barriers at low temperature. Adv Eng Mater2023; 25: 2100947.
17.
WangTPuJBoC, et al.Sol–gel prepared Al2O3 coatings for the application as tritium permeation barrier. Fusion Eng Des2010; 85: 1068–1072.
18.
BesraLLiuM. A review on fundamentals and applications of electrophoretic deposition (EPD). Prog Mater Sci2007; 52: 1–61.
19.
AkramMArshadNBraemA. Nanoparticle-modified coatings by electrophoretic deposition for corrosion protection of magnesium. Surf Eng2022; 38: 430–439.
20.
HuSLiWFinkleaH, et al.A review of electrophoretic deposition of metal oxides and its application in solid oxide fuel cells. Adv Colloid Interface Sci2020; 276: 102102.
21.
Escorcia-DíazDGarcía-MoraSRendón-CastrillónL, et al.Advancements in nanoparticle deposition techniques for diverse substrates: a review. Nanomaterials2023; 13: 2586.
22.
RoustaADorranianDElahiM. Electrophoretic deposition of cobalt oxide nanoparticles on aluminium substrate. Surf Eng2020; 36: 919–928.
23.
CorniIRyanMPBoccacciniAR. Electrophoretic deposition: from traditional ceramics to nanotechnology. J Eur Ceram Soc2008; 28: 1353–1367.
24.
UchikoshiTOzawaKHattonBD, et al.Dense, bubble-free ceramic deposits from aqueous suspensions by electrophoretic deposition. J Mater Res2001; 16: 321–324.
25.
MacaKHadrabaHCihlarJ. Electrophoretic deposition of alumina and zirconia: I. Single-component systems. Ceram Int2004; 30: 843–851.
26.
TurkogluTAyI. Investigation of mechanical, kinetic and corrosion properties of borided AISI 304, AISI 420 and AISI 430. Surf Eng2021; 37: 1020–1031.
27.
ThanedburapasupSWetchiraratNMuengjaiA, et al.Fabrication of Mn–Co alloys electrodeposited on AISI 430 ferritic stainless steel for SOFC interconnect applications. Metals2023; 13: 612.
28.
ThublaorTWimanPSiripongsakulT, et al.Development of annealed Mn–Co and Mn–Co–Cu coated AISI 430 stainless steels for SOFC interconnect application. Oxid Met2021; 96: 93–103.
29.
LiFZhangPZhaoY, et al.The preparation and properties of Mn–Co–O spinel coating for SOFC metallic interconnect. Int J Hydrogen Energy2023; 48: 16048–16056.
30.
RuhiGModiOSinhaA, et al.Effect of sintering temperatures on corrosion and wear properties of sol–gel alumina coatings on surface pre-treated mild steel. Corros Sci2008; 50: 639–649.
31.
SarkarPNicholsonPS. Electrophoretic deposition (EPD): mechanisms, kinetics, and application to ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc1996; 79: 1987–2002.
32.
CordelairJGreilP. Discrete element modeling of solid formation during electrophoretic deposition. J Mater Sci2004; 39: 1017–1021.
33.
GrönerLMengisLGaletzM, et al.Investigations of the deuterium permeability of as-deposited and oxidized Ti2AlN coatings. Materials2020; 13: 2085.
34.
TantraRSchulzePQuinceyP. Effect of nanoparticle concentration on zeta-potential measurement results and reproducibility. Particuology2010; 8: 279–285.
35.
KrauseDThomasBLeinenbachC, et al.The electrophoretic deposition of Bioglass® particles on stainless steel and Nitinol substrates. Surf Coat Technol2006; 200: 4835–4845.
36.
IshiharaTShimoseKKudoT, et al.Preparation of yttria-stabilized zirconia thin films on strontium-doped LaMnO3 cathode substrates via electrophoretic deposition for solid oxide fuel cells. J Am Ceram Soc2000; 83: 1921–1927.
37.
ChenFLiuM. Preparation of yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) films on La0.85Sr0.15MnO3 (LSM) and LSM–YSZ substrates using an electrophoretic deposition (EPD) process. J Eur Ceram Soc2001; 21: 127–134.
38.
SarkarPDeDRhoH. Synthesis and microstructural manipulation of ceramics by electrophoretic deposition. J Mater Sci2004; 39: 819–823.
