Particle impurities deposition on solid surfaces can destabilize the matrix material. Moving bubbles can remove particles without damaging the matrix material. In this study, CaCO3 particles were utilized to simulate impurities, and samples were prepared using a deposition method. The effects of bubble-particle interactions were assessed by analyzing the gray value of the sample surface. Prolonging bubble exposure and tilting the granular sample at 30°-45° effectively removed surface particles. Finite element simulations indicate that particle removal results from the combined actions of bubble impact stress, bubble surface tension, and fluid shear force. This study deepens the understanding of the bubble cleaning principle and lays a theoretical foundation for the development of more efficient cleaning technology.
BankapalliNKGuptaVSaxenaP, et al.Filament fabrication and subsequent additive manufacturing, debinding, and sintering for extrusion-based metal additive manufacturing and their applications: a review. Composites Part B2023; 264: 110915.
2.
ChenXFengYZhongW, et al.Numerical investigation of particle deposition in a triple bifurcation airway due to gravitational sedimentation and inertial impaction. Powder Technol2018; 323: 284–293.
3.
StaffordJXuC. Deposition of particle pollution in turbulent forced-air cooling. Aerosol Sci Technol2021; 55: 486–500.
4.
LiuXYueSLiJ, et al.Study of a dust deposition mechanism dominated by electrostatic force on a solar photovoltaic module. Sci Total Environ2021; 754: 142241.
5.
HoP-YChenC-KHuangK-H. Combined effects of thermophoresis and electrophoresis on particle deposition in mixed convection flow onto a vertical wavy plate. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer2019; 101: 116–121.
6.
HeXPengH. Modeling inception and evolution of near-wall vapor thermo-cavitation bubbles via a lattice Boltzmann method. Int J Hydrogen Energy2024; 49: 828–849.
7.
HanXLiaoZLunaGG, et al.Towards the understanding the effect of surface integrity on the fatigue performance of silicon carbide particle reinforced aluminium matrix composites. J Manuf Process2022; 73: 518–530.
8.
SuYChenYFengS. Improved dielectric properties of PVDF composites with Ag-deposited NBCTO hybrid particles. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron2022; 33: 10752–10760.
9.
SeguraCVargasVValenzuela-FernándezRA, et al.Effect on the optical efficiency and photostability of luminescent solar concentrator based on the deposition of AgSiO2@NPs. ACS Appl Energy Mater2020; 3: 7680–7688.
10.
HuRZhaoZZhouJ, et al.Ultrasound assisted surface micro-dissolution to embed nano TiO2 on cotton fabrics in ZnCl2 aqueous solution. Ultrason Sonochem2019; 56: 160–166.
11.
ShiCZhangSZhaoJ, et al.Experimental study on removal of microplastics from aqueous solution by magnetic force effect on the magnetic sepiolite. Sep Purif Technol2022; 288: 120564.
12.
LinMPangCQinB, et al.Removing adhesive impurities from waste glass to regenerate into ground glass by high-speed fluid friction cleaning technology. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng2023; 11: 14226–14235.
13.
KimDHongJChungSK. Acoustic bubble array-induced jet flow for cleaning particulate contaminants on semiconductor wafers. Korean J Chem Eng2022; 39: 3261–3266.
14.
LinJLiXQiaoG, et al.Unexpected high-temperature stability of beta-Zn4Sb3 opens the door to enhanced thermoelectric performance. J Am Chem Soc2014; 136: 1497–1504.
15.
JinNZhangFCuiY, et al.Environment-friendly surface cleaning using micro-nano bubbles. Particuology2022; 66: 1–9.
16.
ChenSZhouYLiuR, et al.Comparison of attachment process of particles to air and oily bubbles in flotation. Adv Powder Technol2023; 34: 104059.
17.
Okorn-SchmidtHFHolsteynsFLippertA, et al.Particle cleaning technologies to meet advanced semiconductor device process requirements. ECS J Solid State Sci Technol2013; 3: N3069–N3080.
18.
ReuterFMettinR. Mechanisms of single bubble cleaning. Ultrason Sonochem2016; 29: 550–562.
19.
ParkRKimW. Bubble collisions on parallel arranged fibers. Int J Multiphase Flow2019; 118: 165–172.
20.
ChandraBHashimotoRMatsumiS, et al.Stabilized mixed material point method for incompressible fluid flow analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2024; 419: 116644.
21.
LiuJWangGZhangL, et al.Numerical simulation of single bubble boiling behavior. Propul Power Res2017; 6: 117–125.
22.
CrhaJBasařováPRuzickaMC, et al.Comparison of two solvers for simulation of single bubble rising dynamics: COMSOL vs. fluent. Minerals2021; 11: 452.
23.
LiXHaoYZhaoP, et al.Simulation study on the phase holdup characteristics of the gas–liquid-solid mini-fluidized beds with bubbling flow. Chem Eng J2022; 427: 131488.
24.
YangZ. On bypass transition in separation bubbles: a review. Propul Power Res2019; 8: 23–34.
25.
RashwanSSDincerIMohanyA. A unique study on the effect of dissolved gases and bubble temperatures on the ultrasonic hydrogen (sonohydrogen) production. Int J Hydrogen Energy2020; 45: 20808–20819.
26.
VerhaagenBFernandez RivasD. Measuring cavitation and its cleaning effect. Ultrason Sonochem2016; 29: 619–628.
27.
FlackKASchultzMP. Hydraulic characterization of sandpaper roughness. Exp Fluids2022; 64: 3.
28.
FengWNgZYChenH, et al.Calcium ion deposition with precipitated calcium carbonate: influencing factors and mechanism exploration. Processes2024; 12: 629.
29.
BrabcováZKarapantsiosTKostoglouM, et al.Bubble–particle collision interaction in flotation systems. Colloids Surf, A2015; 473: 95–103.
30.
ColinO. Quantitative scanning transmission electron microscopy for materials science: imaging, diffraction, spectroscopy, and tomography. Annu Rev Mater Res2023; 53: 105–141.
31.
SahaADeshmukhAYGrengaT, et al.Dimensional analysis of vapor bubble growth considering bubble–bubble interactions in flash boiling microdroplets of highly volatile liquid electrofuels. Int J Multiphase Flow2023; 165: 104479.
32.
ParuyaSRoyK. Isothermal and non-isothermal growth of a vapor bubble in pool boiling – effect of translational velocity of bubble. Int J Heat Mass Transfer2023; 216: 124570.
33.
MaaroufSBernardiCYakoubiD. Characteristics/finite element analysis for two incompressible fluid flows with surface tension using level set method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2022; 394: 114843.
34.
BakerTNMuñoz-de EscalonaPOlasoloM, et al.Role of preplaced silicon on a TIG processed SiC incorporated microalloyed steel. Mater Sci Technol2020; 36: 1349–1363.
35.
HuangKYoonR-H. Control of bubble ζ-potentials to improve the kinetics of bubble-particle interactions. Miner Eng2020; 151: 106295.
36.
SuKLiBWuJ, et al.Joint effects of gas bubbles and solid particles on sonochemical inhibition in sonicated aqueous solutions. Ultrason Sonochem2023; 101: 106717.
37.
SafaeiSHendySCWillmottGR. Stability of amphiphilic Janus dimers in shear flow: a molecular dynamics study. Soft Matter2020; 16: 7116–7125.
38.
SafaeiSArchereauAYMHendySC, et al.Molecular dynamics simulations of Janus nanoparticles in a fluid flow. Soft Matter2019; 15: 6742–6752.
39.
WallsPLBirdJCBourouibaL. Moving with bubbles: a review of the interactions between bubbles and the microorganisms that surround them. Integr Comp Biol2014; 54: 1014–1025.
40.
DongYHXuZTLuY. Two methods for deriving viscosity coefficients in Newton's viscosity law. J Jiamusi Univ (Nat Sci Ed)2003: 323–325, 336. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-1402.2003.03.025.
41.
YoungT. An essay on the cohesion of fluids. Philos Trans R Soc Lond1805; 95: 65–87.
42.
HillLT. Concerning the dependence of the surface energy and surface tension of spherical drops and bubbles on radius. J Am Chem Soc2002; 72: 3923–3927.
