Porous magnesium and its alloys have garnered significant attention due to their lightweight nature and excellent mechanical properties, making them attractive for various applications. Consequently, research in this field is expanding rapidly, utilizing a wide range of techniques to customize material properties for targeted applications. The primary objective is to develop closed-cell, open-cell, or complex 3D structures optimized for specific applications. Herein, we present a comprehensive review of the fabrication methods and properties of porous magnesium and its alloys. Fabrication techniques including liquid and powder metallurgy, provide distinct advantages in controlling pore size, morphology, and distribution. Furthermore, the review examines the properties of magnesium-based porous materials and factors influencing them, underscoring their potential for advanced applications in various industries.
SongGAtrensA. Understanding magnesium corrosion—A framework for improved alloy performance. Adv Eng Mater2003; 5: 837–858.
2.
YinMLiZJinQ, et al.Effect of the solidification mode on the pore growth of gasar porous mg-ag alloy. Cryst Res Technol2023; 58: 2300038.
3.
PosadaVMRamírezJAllainJP, et al. Synthesis and properties of mg-based foams by infiltration casting without protective cover gas. J Materi Eng and Perform2020; 29: 681–690.
4.
YangDGuoSChenJ, et al.Preparation principle and compression properties of cellular Mg–Al–Zn alloy foams fabricated by the gas release reaction powder metallurgy approach. J Alloys Compd2021; 857: 158112.
5.
KlegerNCihovaMMasaniaK, et al.Löffler, 3D printing of salt as a template for magnesium with structured porosity. Adv Mater2019; 31: 1903783.
6.
JiaGHuangHNiuJ, et al.Exploring the interconnectivity of biomimetic hierarchical porous Mg scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: effects of pore size distribution on mechanical properties, degradation behavior and cell migration ability. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys2021; 9: 1954–1966.
7.
DongQLiYJiangH, et al.3D-cubic Interconnected porous Mg-based scaffolds for bone repair. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys2021; 9: 1329–1338.
8.
SinghSVashisthPShrivastavA, et al.Synthesis and characterization of a novel open cellular Mg-based scaffold for tissue engineering application. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2019; 94: 54–62.
9.
AgbedorSoYangDChenJ, et al.Reactive sintering principle and compressive properties of porous AZ91 magnesium alloy foams produced by powder metallurgy approach. Materialwiss Werkstofftech2022; 53: 244–259.
10.
WangHZhuDFWuY, et al.New insight into fabrication of shaped Mg–X alloy foams with cellular structure via a gas release reaction powder metallurgy route. J Iron Steel Res. Int2021; 28: 125–132.
11.
ParaiRBandyopadhyay-GhoshS. Engineered bio-nanocomposite magnesium scaffold for bone tissue regeneration. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2019; 96: 45–52.
12.
LiuJALiuSJWangB, et al.Compressive property and energy absorption characteristic of interconnected porous Mg-Zn-Y alloys with adjusting Y addition. J Magn Alloys2023. 10.1016/j.jma.2023.06.014
13.
LiuJLiuSShiS, et al.Adjusting compressive properties of open-cell Mg-Gd-Zn foams by variation of Gd content. Mater Sci Eng A2021; 820: 141562.
14.
LuXZhangZDuH, et al.Compressive behavior of Mg alloy foams at elevated temperature. J Alloys Compd2019; 797: 727–734.
15.
KangLShiYLuoX. Effects of sodium chloride on structure and compressive properties of foamed AZ91. AIP Adv2021; 11: 015118.
16.
YueX-ZHurB-Y. Effect of the holding temperature and vacuum pressure for the open cell Mg alloy foams. Korean J Mater Res2012; 22: 309–315.
17.
NguyenTLStaigerMPDiasGJ, et al.A novel manufacturing route for fabrication of topologically-ordered porous magnesium scaffolds. Adv Eng Mater2011; 13: 872–881.
18.
JiangGLiQWangC, et al.Characterization and investigation of the deformation behavior of porous magnesium scaffolds with entangled architectured pore channels. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2016; 64: 139–150.
19.
LiQJiangGDongJ, et al.Damping behavior and energy absorption capability of porous magnesium. J Alloys Compd2016; 680: 522–530.
20.
Osorio-HernándezJOSuarezMAGoodallR, et al.Manufacturing of open-cell Mg foams by replication process and mechanical properties. Mater Des2014; 64: 136–141.
21.
BhosaleDDevikarASasikumarS, et al.Foaming Mg alloy and composite using MgCO3 blowing agent. Metall Mater Trans B2021; 52: 931–943.
22.
DevikarABhosaleDGeorgyK, et al.Effect of beryllium on the stabilization of Mg-3Ca alloy foams. Mater Sci Eng B2022; 286: 116007.
23.
ParkSHSongK-HUmYS, et al.Rheological characteristics of Mg-Al alloys with ceramic particles for meta foam. Mater Sci Forum2006; 510–511: 742–745.
24.
MakwanaDPramodBChaudhariP, et al.Processing of bioresorbable closed-cell Mg foam for bone implant applications. Mater Manuf Processes2023; 38: 1685–1693.
25.
YangD-HHurB-YYangS-R. Study on fabrication and foaming mechanism of Mg foam using CaCO3 as blowing agent. J Alloys Compd2008; 461: 221–227.
26.
ParkS-HUmY-SKumC-H, et al.Thermophysical properties of Al and Mg alloys for metal foam fabrication. Colloids Surf, A2005; 263: 280–283.
27.
ParkSHHurBYSongK-H. Rheology and foaming characteristics of melt for metal foam. Mater Sci Forum2005; 475–479: 2683–2686.
28.
LiDLiJLiT, et al.Preparation and characterization of aluminum foams with ZrH2 as foaming agent. Trans Nonferr Metals Soc China2011; 21: 346–352.
29.
DevikarAMuduliBMukherjeeM, et al.Stabilization and mechanical properties of mg-3Ca and mg-3Ca/SiC/5p foams alloyed with beryllium. J Materi Eng and Perform2023; 32: 2700–2709.
30.
YangD-HShang-RunYHuiW, et al.Compressive properties of cellular Mg foams fabricated by melt-foaming method. Mater Sci Eng A2010; 527: 5405–5409.
31.
HuangWLuoHLinH, et al.Compressive behavior and damping property of Mg alloy/SiCp composite foams. J Materi Eng and Perform2016; 25: 587–593.
32.
LuoHJZhangLXuZG, et al.Effect of technological parameters on preparation of Mg-based foam materials. Mater Sci Forum2013; 749: 356–360.
33.
XiaXWangJPengY, et al.Temperature-Time superposition effect on compressive properties of AZ31B magnesium composite foams. Metals (Basel)2018; 8: 434.
34.
LiHLiZJinQ, et al.Effect of hydrogen pressure on pore growth and microstructure of GASAR porous Mg–Ag eutectic alloys. Vacuum2023; 217: 112552.
35.
ShapovalovV. Prospective applications of gas-eutectic porous materials (Gasars) in USA. Mater Sci Forum2007; 539–543: 1183–1187.
36.
BoczkalGJanoskaMSetmanD, et al.Magnesium gasar as a potential monolithic hydrogen absorbent. Int J Hydrogen Energy2021; 46: 13106–13115.
37.
HoshiyamaHIkedaTNakajimaH. Fabrication of Lotus-type porous magnesium and its alloys by unidirectional solidification under hydrogen atmosphere. High Temp Mater Processes2011; 26: 303–316.
38.
ZhouCLiangGLiuY, et al.Pore structure of porous mg-1Mn-xZn alloy fabricated by metal–gas eutectic unidirectional solidification. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys2022; 10: 2137–2146.
39.
LiuMLiZLiF, et al.Mechanical properties and in vitro biodegradation behavior of GASAR porous Mg-Ag alloy. Mater Lett2022; 315: 131920.
40.
LiuEHePLiZ, et al.Fabrication of gasar porous Mg–Ag alloys by metal–gas eutectic directional solidification method. Cryst Growth Des2023; 23: 8303–8310.
41.
SadeghiZMansoorianfarMPanjepourM, et al.Lotus-type porous magnesium production via in situ pyrolysis of viscose rayon fiber in a melting process. J Mater Sci2023; 58: 9297–9307.
42.
GuXNZhouWRZhengYF, et al.Degradation and cytotoxicity of lotus-type porous pure magnesium as potential tissue engineering scaffold material. Mater Lett2010; 64: 1871–1874.
43.
KumarNBhartiAPrasadD, et al.Investigations on physical and mechanical properties of Mg composites and foams fabricated by powder metallurgy using NaCl, materials today. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp2023; 78: 7–11.
44.
SukmanaIHerlinaUHandokoAS, et al.Semi-solid processing of porous magnesium using Titanium wire space holder (TWSH) for biodegradable bone scaffold application. AIP Conf Proc2023; 2601: 020022.
45.
HongKParkHKimY, et al.Mechanical and biocorrosive properties of magnesium-aluminum alloy scaffold for biomedical applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2019; 98: 213–224.
46.
SharifiSEbrahimian-HosseinabadiMDiniG, et al.Magnesium-zinc-graphene oxide nanocomposite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Arabian J Chem2023; 16: 104715.
ČapekJVojtěchD. Properties of porous magnesium prepared by powder metallurgy. Mater Sci Eng: C2013; 33: 564–569.
49.
DuttaSBavya DeviKRoyM. Processing and degradation behavior of porous magnesium scaffold for biomedical applications. Adv Powder Technol2017; 28: 3204–3212.
50.
ToghyaniSKhodaeiMRazaviM. Magnesium scaffolds with two novel biomimetic designs and MgF2 coating for bone tissue engineering. Surf Coat Technol2020; 395: 125929.
51.
YazdimamaghaniMRazaviMVashaeeD, et al.Significant degradability enhancement in multilayer coating of polycaprolactone-bioactive glass/gelatin-bioactive glass on magnesium scaffold for tissue engineering applications. Appl Surf Sci2015; 338: 137–145.
52.
KangM-HJangT-SKimSW, et al.MgF2-coated porous magnesium/alumina scaffolds with improved strength, corrosion resistance, and biological performance for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng: C2016; 62: 634–642.
53.
JiHYaoGLuoH, et al.Compressive and energy absorption properties of closed-cell magnesium foams. Rare Met2010; 29: 417–420.
54.
XiaXFengJDingJ, et al.Fabrication and characterization of closed-cell magnesium-based composite foams. Mater Des2015; 74: 36–43.
55.
HuangW-ZLuoH-JMuY-L, et al.Dynamic compressive property of closed-cell mg alloy composite foams reinforced with SiC particles. Acta Metall. Sin. (Engl. Lett.)2019; 32: 1320–1328.
56.
ManakariVParandeGDoddamaniM, et al.Evaluation of wear resistance of magnesium/glass microballoon syntactic foams for engineering/biomedical applications. Ceram Int2019; 45: 9302–9305.
57.
AkinwekomiAD. Microstructural characterisation and corrosion behaviour of microwave-sintered magnesium alloy AZ61/fly ash microspheres syntactic foams. Heliyon2019; 5. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01531
58.
DongZSongDSunW, et al.Compressive properties of the magnesium matrix syntactic foams using different types of porous volcanic rock particles. Materialia2022; 25: 101535.
59.
WangJWangNLiuX, et al.Compressive deformation behavior of closed-cell micro-pore magnesium composite foam. Materials (Basel)2018; 11: 31.
60.
JiaGHouYChenC, et al.Precise fabrication of open porous Mg scaffolds using NaCl templates: relationship between space holder particles, pore characteristics and mechanical behavior. Mater Des2018; 140: 106–113.
61.
ZhouCLiuYZhangH, et al.Fabrication of lotus-type porous Mg−Mn alloys by metal/gas eutectic unidirectional solidification. Trans Nonferr Metals Soc China2020; 30: 1524–1534.
62.
LuGHaoHWangF, et al.Preparation of closed-cell Mg foams using SiO2-coated CaCO3 as blowing agent in atmosphere. Trans Nonferr Metals Soc China2013; 23: 1832–1837.
63.
ErryaniAPramujiFAnnurD, et al.Microstructures and mechanical study of mg alloy foam based on mg-zn-ca-CaCO3 system. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng2017; 202: 012028.
64.
BiYZhengYLiY. Microstructure and mechanical properties of sintered porous magnesium using polymethyl methacrylate as the space holder. Mater Lett2015; 161: 583–586.
65.
TanPPMohamadHAnasyidaAS. Properties of porous magnesium using polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) as a space holder. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser2018; 1082: 012063.
66.
AidaSFZuhailawatiHAnasyidaAS. The effect of space holder content and sintering temperature of magnesium foam on microstructural and properties prepared by sintering dissolution process (SDP) using carbamide space holder. Procedia Eng2017; 184: 290–297.
67.
YueX-ZKitazonoKYueX-J, et al.Effect of fluidity on the manufacturing of open cell magnesium alloy foams. J Magn Alloys2016; 4: 1–7.
68.
YangYXiongXChenJ, et al.Research advances in magnesium and magnesium alloys worldwide in 2020. J Magn Alloys2021; 9: 705–747.
69.
LeguillonDPiatR. Fracture of porous materials – influence of the pore size. Eng Fract Mech2008; 75: 1840–1853.
