Describes an attempt to study the attitudes of planners and decision makers in government service or large institutions in developing countries to the library services they use regularly. A questionnaire was presented to people on the training courses run during 1987 at the Project Planning Centre for Developing Countries at the University of Bradford. From the results of this survey it is concluded that a sizeable minority of people with the power to allocate resources have both a favourable and realistic attitude to libraries. Librarians should be more prepared to cooperate with sympathetic members of their institutions in improving library service and thus contributing more effectively to the development effort.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
This paper is a revised version of one originally presented in September 1987 to the Information and Documentation Working Group of the European Association of Development Research and Training Centres.
2.
Briquet de Lemos, Antonio A.A portrait of librarianship in developing societies. In: Parker, J. Stephen. ed. Information consultants in action. London, Mansell, 1986. 258p. ISBN 0-7201-1753-4. Chapter 1, pp.25-74.
3.
Nzotta, Briggs C.Providing information for research: Federal Research Institute Libraries in Nigeria. Information Development , vol.1, no.4, October 1985. 223-228.
4.
Guneratne, D.P.Data for local development: a pilot project in Sri Lanka. Information Development, vol.2, no.2, April 1986. 79-84.
5.
Lungu, Charles B.M.Resource-sharing and self-reliance in Southern Africa. Information Development, vol.3, no.2, April 1987. 82-86.
6.
Seminar on the Need for Development Oriented National Information Policy in Zambia within the Context of the Southern African Documentation and Information System (SADIS), 9-13 September 1985. Lusaka, Zambia Library Association, 1985. Quoted in: Lungu, op.cit.
7.
Samaha, E.K.Information management in agricultural research . Information Development, vol.1, no.4, October 1985. 210-216.
8.
All percentages quoted have been rounded to the nearest whole number and may therefore not always total exactly 100 percent in respect of each response. Some respondents failed to answer individual questions.
