Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Construction and application of evaluation index system of accessibility of public digital cultural services in rural areas: A three-stage study from China
With the comprehensive enhancement of rural internet infrastructure and the continuous increase in internet penetration rates, China's public cultural service system has achieved significant results. However, salient issues such as low accessibility, a pronounced mismatch between supply and demand, and an underdeveloped evaluation mechanism remain. This study aims to effectively solve the accessibility obstacles of rural public digital cultural services (RPDCS) by constructing and applying a comprehensive evaluation index system. Accordingly, this study employs an integrated approach combining grounded theory, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and the Analytic Hierarchy Process-Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation (AHP-FCE) method to develop an evaluation index system for the accessibility of RPDCS, which is subsequently explored and applied empirically. This study proposes a multidimensional “5A” evaluation framework that incorporates user behavior dynamics and cultural identity, thereby theoretically moving beyond technical accessibility and establishing a new paradigm for public digital cultural services research. On a practical level, it proposes a closed-loop optimization pathway that utilizes feedback mechanisms to enhance resource utilization efficiency and user satisfaction, thereby improving service accessibility and contributing to the construction of a sustainable ecosystem for rural digital cultural services.
BryslandACurryA (2001) Service improvements in public services using SERVQUAL. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal11(6): 389–401.
3.
CalabròFDella SpinaL (2014) The cultural and environmental resources for sustainable development of rural areas in economically disadvantaged contexts-economic-appraisals issues of a model of management for the valorisation of public assets. Advanced Materials Research869: 43–48.
4.
ChangSEKuoMY (2021) A place-based pedagogical action study to enrich rural sustainability: Knowledge ties of National Taiwan University’s 10-year partnership with Pinglin. Sustainability13(5): 2916.
5.
ChangSIYenDCChangIC, et al. (2012) Study of the digital divide evaluation model for government agencies–a Taiwanese local government’s perspective. Information Systems Frontiers14(3): 693–709.
6.
ChurchillGA (1979) A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of marketing research16(1): 64–73.
7.
DaiYFuRZhangM (2024) Research on the willingness to participate in public digital cultural services for the elderly based on SOR theory. College Library Work44(2): 13–20.
8.
DaiYSunY (2022) Sense of access to public digital cultural services: Connotation, evaluation system and enhancement strategies. Research in Librarianship3: 2–10.
9.
DaiYQHuYF (2022) Research on Accessibility Elements of Public Digital Culture Service. Library and Information Service66(16): 57–68.
10.
De HaanEMeierSHaartsenT, et al. (2018) Defining “success” of local citizens’ initiatives in maintaining public services in rural areas: A professional’s perspective. Sociologia Ruralis58(2): 312–330.
11.
De WitteKGeysB (2011) Evaluating efficient public good provision: Theory and evidence from a generalised conditional efficiency model for public libraries. Journal of Urban Economics69(3): 319–327.
Fanea-IvanoviciMPanăMC (2020) From Culture to Smart Culture. How digital transformations enhance citizens’ well-being through better cultural accessibility and inclusion. IEEE Access8: 37988–38000.
14.
FengXLiJ (2021) The impact of digitization on access to public culture service in rural area and its mechanism: Cases of 650 rural residents in Beijing. Research on Library Science5: 19–27.
15.
FengXLiJCuiK (2022) Framework and evaluation of accessibility of rural public cultural services in the context of mobile internet: Taking 10 pilot counties of digital villages as an example. Library10: 84–90.
16.
FernandesSVenkateshVGPandaR, et al. (2021) Measurement of factors influencing online shopper buying decisions: A scale development and validation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services59: 102394.
17.
GoodallKTNewmanLAWardPR (2014) Improving access to health information for older migrants by using grounded theory and social network analysis to understand their information behaviour and digital technology use. European Journal of Cancer Care23(6): 728–738.
JiangLP (2022) Research on the mechanism of the influence of user information avoidance behaviour in rural public digital cultural services. MA Thesis, Jiangsu University, China. http://doi.org/10.27170/d.cnki.gjsuu.2022.001903.
20.
JiangYYanZZhuR (2019) A typological study on the accessibility of public cultural services in peri-urban villages: An analysis of multiple cases based on H city in Zhejiang province. China Rural Research1: 209–233.
21.
KePSuF (2018) Mediating effects of user experience usability: An empirical study on mobile library application in China. The Electronic Library36(5): 892–909.
22.
KellyWMcGrathBHubbardD (2023) Starting from “scratch”: Building young people’s digital skills through a coding club collaboration with rural public libraries. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science55(2): 487–499.
23.
KneževićMVujkoABorovčaninD (2025) Community-Centered farm-based hospitality in agriculture: Fostering rural tourism, well-being, and sustainability. Agriculture15(15): 1613.
24.
LestariLINoviantiE (2023) Communication strategy through traditional and weaving villages to increase cultural promotion in East Sumba. Nyimak: Journal of Communication7(2): 221–237.
25.
LysgårdHK (2016) The “actually existing” cultural policy and culture-led strategies of rural places and small towns. Journal of Rural Studies44: 1–11.
26.
MathevulaMDUwizeyimanaDE (2014) The challenges facing the integration of ICT in teaching and learning activities in South African rural secondary schools. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences5(20): 1087–1097.
27.
MwansaGNganduMRMkwambiZ (2025) Bridging the digital divide: Exploring the challenges and solutions for digital exclusion in rural South Africa. Discover Global Society3(1): 54.
OmeluzorSUOyovwe-TinuoyeGOEmeka-UkwuU (2017) An assessment of rural libraries and information services for rural development: A study of Delta State, Nigeria. The Electronic Library35(3): 445–471.
30.
PanY (2024) Research on the mechanism of rural public digital cultural services on digital inclusion: A field survey based on rural user groups. Library Development4: 83–95.
31.
PearceDG (2001) An integrative framework for urban tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research28(4): 926–946.
32.
PenchanskyRThomasJW (1981) The concept of access: Definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Medical Care19(2): 127–140.
33.
PengXFengY (2024) Driving mechanisms and strategic responses for promoting high-quality development of public cultural services through new quality productivity. Library Tribune44(12): 29–38.
34.
QianJWangMZhouL, et al. (2024) User adoption behavior of rural public digital culture services from a personal information world perspective: A mixed research in China. Library & Information Science Research46(1): e101282.
35.
RahmanMSUSimmonsDShoneMC, et al. (2022) Social and cultural capitals in tourism resource governance: The essential lenses for community focussed co-management. Journal of Sustainable Tourism30(11): 2665–2685.
36.
RealBBertotJCJaegerPT (2014) Rural public libraries and digital inclusion: Issues and challenges. Information Technology and Libraries33(1): 6–24.
37.
RobertsEAndersonBASkerrattS, et al. (2017) A review of the rural-digital policy agenda from a community resilience perspective. Journal of Rural Studies54: 372–385.
38.
ShiY (2021) Research on the status quo, problems and countermeasures of public cultural service supply in Lanzhou City. MA Thesis, Northwest Normal University, China. http://doi.org/10.27410/d.cnki.gxbfu.2021.001185.
39.
SikesS (2020) Rural public library outreach services and elder users: A case study of the Washington County (VA) Public Library. Public Library Quarterly39(4): 363–388.
40.
ŠťastnáMVaisharABrychtaJ, et al. (2020) Cultural tourism as a driver of rural development. Case study: Southern Moravia. Sustainability12(21): 9064.
41.
TangXLiX (2021) Role stress, burnout, and workplace support among newly recruited social workers. Research on Social Work Practice31(5): 529–540.
42.
TomasevskiK (2004) Manual on Rights-based Education: Global Human Rights Requirements Made Simple. Bangkok: UNESCO Bangkok. https://coilink.org/20.500.12592/qz61432.
43.
UzuegbuCP (2019) Impact of tailor-made information literacy provision on rural dwellers’ participation in sustainable development targets in Nigeria:: implications for public library services to oral societies. IFLA Journal45(2): 81–103.
44.
VehovarVSicherlPHüsingT, et al. (2006) Methodological challenges of digital divide measurements. The Information Society22(5): 279–290.
45.
VelagaNRBeecroftMNelsonJD, et al. (2012) Transport poverty meets the digital divide: Accessibility and connectivity in rural communities. Journal of Transport Geography21: 102–112.
46.
WangLW (2024) Innovative approaches and practical pathways for empowering the equalization of public cultural services with new quality productivity. Library Development328(4): 74–82.
47.
WangMHuaYWChenY (2022) A study on user churn of rural public digital cultural services in eastern China from the perspective of S-O-R theory. Library Journal41(2): 36.
48.
WangQ (2015) Research on the evaluation of “accessibility” of rural bookstore services. Library Development252(4): 34–38. http://tsgjs.org.cn/CN/Y2015/V252/I4/34.
49.
WangQWuLC (2015) A framework of evaluating the access to public cultural services: Some experiences from other areas. The Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute16(3): 53–59.
50.
WangS (2009) Weak accessibility and development of urban community welfare services in China. Journal of Social Sciences of Jilin University49(1): 133–139, 60.
51.
Wang X, Yang ZM and Guo YL (2024) Research on the influencing factors of cultural and tourism service quality in Huizhou area. Sustainability16(13): 5535.
52.
WanyanDHuJ (2020) How to provide public digital cultural services in China. Library Hi Tech38(3): 504–521.
53.
WanyanDTongY (2022) Survey and analysis of service mode of foreign public digital cultural resources integration platform under the perspective of matching supply and demand. Library Development315(5): 124–131.
WuSCaoM (2022) The premechanism and action logic of grassroots rural talents in the rural public cultural service system under the development of digital technology. Mobile Information Systems2022(1): 5287465.
56.
XiaoXZengY (2015) New public service theory and the integration of public digital cultural service resources. Library Development252(8): 38–43. http://tsgjs.org.cn/CN/Y2015/V252/I8/38.
57.
YangBXiangSZhangZ (2024) Accessibility of rural public digital cultural services in context of Chinese modernization: Connotation, evaluation dimension and practice orientation. Library Work and Study2024(08): 5–12, 20.
58.
YoonHY (2016) User acceptance of mobile library applications in academic libraries: An application of the technology acceptance model. The Journal of Academic Librarianship42(6): 687–693.
59.
ZhangXWangDChenZ (2017) Research progress of public digital cultural services in China. Library111(12): 93–99.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
