The study develops a 33 items Influencer Following Motives Scale for analyzing why people follow social media influencers. The study unfolds in four stages: initial item formation through interviews and literature review, item refinement via exploratory factor analysis, validation of the scale through confirmatory factor analysis, and final validation using the Multi-Trait Multi-Method Matrix. The scale identifies eleven motivational dimensions: Beauty, Authenticity, Learning, Boredom, Expertise, Entertainment, Aesthetics, Curiosity, Sharing, Similarity, and Information. The developed measurement scale aids in understanding follower motivations, offering insights for influencers and content creators to engage their audience more effectively.
AbdullahKHMuzawiRGazaliN, et al. (2023) Digital marketing: A scientometric review. Contemporary Management Research19(1): 55–79.
2.
Al-HasanA (2024) Social media marketing and hospital brand equity: An empirical investigation. Information Development. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669241236199.
3.
AlhothaliGTAljefreeNM (2023) Young adults’ sought gratifications from, and perceptions of food advertising by, social media influencers: A qualitative approach. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition42(1): 103.
4.
AwEC-XChuahSH-W (2021) “Stop the unattainable ideal for an ordinary me!” fostering parasocial relationships with social media influencers: The role of self-discrepancy. Journal of Business Research132: 146–157.
5.
BarrickMRMountMK (1991) The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology44(1): 1–26.
6.
BartaSBelancheDFernándezA, et al. (2023) Influencer marketing on TikTok: The effectiveness of humor and followers’ hedonic experience. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services70: 103149.
7.
BentlerPMBonettDG (1980) Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin88(3): 88.
8.
BoermanSCVan ReijmersdalEA (2020) Disclosing influencer marketing on YouTube to children: The moderating role of para-social relationship. Frontiers in Psychology10: 3042.
9.
BollenKA (1989) Structural equations with latent variables, Vol. 210. John Wiley & Sons.
10.
BrailovskaiaJSchillackHMargrafJ (2020) Tell me why are you using social media (SM)! Relationship between reasons for use of SM, SM flow, daily stress, depression, anxiety, and addictive SM use–an exploratory investigation of young adults in Germany. Computers in Human Behavior113: 106511.
11.
CampbellDTFiskeDW (1959) Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin56(2): 81.
12.
ChaeJ (2018) Explaining females’ envy toward social media influencers. Media Psychology21(2): 246–262.
13.
ChangS-CWangC-CKuoC-Y (2020) Social media influencer research: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies11(2): 75–86.
14.
CharlesAdC (2023) Thematic analysis in social media influencers: Who are they following and why?Frontiers in Communication8: 1217684.
15.
ChurchillGAJr. (1979) A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research16(1): 64–73.
CroesEBartelsJ (2021) Young adults’ motivations for following social influencers and their relationship to identification and buying behavior. Computers in Human Behavior124: 106910.
18.
DeVellisRFThorpeCT (2021) Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage publications.
19.
DhaneshGSDuthlerG (2019) Relationship management through social media influencers: Effects of followers’ awareness of paid endorsement. Public Relations Review45(3): 101765.
20.
DibbleJLHartmannTRosaenSF (2016) Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship: Conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures. Human Communication Research42(1): 21–44.
21.
DjafarovaERushworthC (2017) Exploring the credibility of online celebrities’ Instagram profiles in influencing the purchase decisions of young female users. Computers in Human Behavior68: 1–7.
22.
FornellCLarckerDF (1981) Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research18: 382–388.
23.
Gil-QuintanaJde LeónEVOsuna-AcedoS, et al. (2022) Nano-influencers edutubers: Perspective of centennial generation families in Spain. Media and Communication10(1): 247–258.
24.
GülnarBBalciŞÇakirV (2010) Motivations of Facebook, YouTube and similar web sites users. Bilig54(54): 161–184.
25.
HairJFBlackWCBabinBJ, et al. (1998) Multivariate data analysis. Uppersaddle river. Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed) Upper Saddle River5(3): 207–219.
26.
HeissRRudolphL (2022) Patients as health influencers: Motivations and consequences of following cancer patients on Instagram. Behaviour & Information Technology42: 806–815.
27.
HortonDRichard WohlR (1956) . Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry19(3): 215–229.
28.
HuLtBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal6(1): 1–55.
29.
JhawarAKumarPVarshneyS (2023) The emergence of virtual influencers: A shift in the influencer marketing paradigm. Young Consumers24(4): 468–484.
30.
KapuscinskiANMastersKS (2010) The current status of measures of spirituality: A critical review of scale development. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality2(4): 91.
31.
KehrHMGraffDBakaçC (2023) Followers’ motives as moderators of the effects of transformational leadership behaviors on follower outcomes and leaders’ influence. Journal of Business and Psychology38(4): 865–886.
32.
KhanML (2017) Social media engagement: What motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube?Computers in Human Behavior66: 236–247.
33.
KiC-WCCuevasLMChongSM, et al. (2020) Influencer marketing: Social media influencers as human brands attaching to followers and yielding positive marketing results by fulfilling needs. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services55: 102133.
34.
KiCWCKimYK (2019) The mechanism by which social media influencers persuade consumers: The role of consumers’ desire to mimic. Psychology & Marketing36(10): 905–922.
35.
LabrecqueLI (2014) Fostering consumer–brand relationships in social media environments: The role of parasocial interaction. Journal of Interactive Marketing28(2): 134–148.
36.
LeeJAEastinMS (2021) Perceived authenticity of social media influencers: Scale development and validation. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing15(4): 822–841.
37.
LeeJASudarshanSSussmanKL, et al. (2022) Why are consumers following social media influencers on Instagram? Exploration of consumers’ motives for following influencers and the role of materialism. International Journal of Advertising41(1): 78–100.
38.
LeiteFPBaptistaPdP (2022) The effects of social media influencers’ self-disclosure on behavioral intentions: The role of source credibility, parasocial relationships, and brand trust. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice30(3): 295–311.
39.
LouCKiewSTJChenT, et al. (2023) Authentically fake? How consumers respond to the influence of virtual influencers. Journal of Advertising52(4): 540–557.
40.
LouCYuanS (2019) Influencer marketing: How message value and credibility affect consumer trust of branded content on social Media. Journal of Interactive Advertising19(1): 58–73.
41.
MalikAZThapaSPaswanAK (2023) Social media influencer (SMI) as a human brand–a need fulfillment perspective. Journal of Product & Brand Management32(2): 173–190.
42.
MasciantonioABourguignonD (2023) Motivation scale for using social network sites: Comparative study between Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat and LinkedIn. Psychologica BELgica63(1): 30–43.
43.
MasudaHHanSHLeeJ (2022) Impacts of influencer attributes on purchase intentions in social media influencer marketing: Mediating roles of characterizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change174: 121246.
44.
McDonaldRPHoM-HR (2002) Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods7(1): 64.
45.
MortonF (2020) Influencer marketing: An exploratory study on the motivations of young adults to follow social media influencers. Journal of Digital & Social Media Marketing8(2): 156–165.
46.
NwagwuWEAkintoyeA (2024) Influence of social media on the uptake of emerging musicians and entertainment events. Information Development40(4): 667–692.
47.
OhanianR (1990) Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising19(3): 39–52.
48.
OngC-SChangS-CLeeS-M (2015) Development of WebHapp: Factors in predicting user perceptions of website-related happiness. Journal of Business Research68(3): 591–598.
49.
PapacharissiZMendelsonA (2011) Toward a new (er) sociability: Uses, gratifications, and social capital on Facebook. In: Media Perspectives for the 21st Century. Routledge, 225–243.
50.
PhuaJJinSVKimJJ (2017) Gratifications of using Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, or Snapchat to follow brands: The moderating effect of social comparison, trust, tie strength, and network homophily on brand identification, brand engagement, brand commitment, and membership intention. Telematics and Informatics34(1): 412–424.
51.
Quan-HaaseAYoungAL (2010) Uses and gratifications of social media: A comparison of Facebook and instant messaging. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society30(5): 350–361.
52.
RaackeJBonds-RaackeJ (2008) Myspace and Facebook: Applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. Cyberpsychology & Behavior11(2): 169–174.
53.
ReinikainenHMunnukkaJMaityD, et al. (2020) ‘You really are a great big sister’–parasocial relationships, credibility, and the moderating role of audience comments in influencer marketing. Journal of Marketing Management36(3-4): 279–298.
54.
Romero SalettiSMVan den BrouckeSBillieuxJ, et al. (2023) Development, psychometric validation, and cross-cultural comparison of the “Instagram motives questionnaire”(IMQ) and the “Instagram uses and patterns questionnaire”(IUPQ). Journal of Behavioral Addictions12(1): 105–127.
55.
RossiterJR (2002) The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing19(4): 305–335.
56.
RyuSParkJ (2020) The effects of benefit-driven commitment on usage of social media for shopping and positive word-of-mouth. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services55: 102094.
57.
SaldanhaNMulyeRJaputraA (2023) How do consumers interact with social media influencers in extraordinary times?Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing18(3): 333–348.
58.
SheldonPBryantK (2016) Instagram: Motives for its use and relationship to narcissism and contextual age. Computers in Human Behavior58: 89–97.
59.
SokolovaKKefiH (2020) Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services53: 101742.
60.
StraubDBoudreauM-CGefenD (2004) Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems13(1): 24.
61.
TafesseWWoodBP (2021) Followers’ engagement with Instagram influencers: The role of influencers’ content and engagement strategy. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services58: 102303.
62.
TengCTsengHLiI, et al. (2011) International English big-five mini-markers: Development of the traditional Chinese version. Journal of Management and Business Research28(6): 579–600.
63.
WalshGBeattySE (2007) Customer-based corporate reputation of a service firm: Scale development and validation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science35: 127–143.
64.
YangLSulaimanZ (2022) Bibliometrics analysis of social media and entrepreneurship research using Scopus database. International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies13(4): 097–134.
65.
YuanSLouC (2020) How social media influencers foster relationships with followers: The roles of source credibility and fairness in parasocial relationship and product interest. Journal of Interactive Advertising20(2): 133–147.
