The study focuses on usability provisions of learning management systems (LMS) in a corrective service organization. Under the influence of goal-directed interaction design principles in design science, the study outlines a new innovative artifact as a conceptual LMS solution that addresses the employee-centric learning model. The collective artifact represents relevant design knowledge assistive to meeting stakeholders’ contextual learning needs, for instance, demonstrating the potential significance of the developed mobile-based approach to support correctional officers in improving their learning on safety professional development. The paper concludes with a practical model that could be applied to assist correctional officers in their in-house training purposes.
Al-GahtaniSS (2016) Empirical investigation of e-learning acceptance assimilation: A structural equation model. Applied Computing and Informatics12(1): 27–50.
2.
AlmarashdehI (2016) Sharing instructors experience of learning management system: A technology perspective of user satisfaction in distance learning course. Computers in Human Behavior63: 249–255.
3.
AlomariBMAAwawdehAAlolayyanMN (2017) Employee performance quality management in the tourism sector (case study of human resources management–employee performance). Modern Applied Science11(9): 1.
4.
AlsabawyAYCater-SteelASoarJ (2016) Determinants of perceived usefulness of e-learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior64: 843–858.
5.
AlturkiAGableGGBaraW (2011) A design science research roadmap. In: Design Science Research in Information Systems Technology, (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6629). Milwaukee, Wisconsin: Springer, 107–123.
6.
AndrewJBarkerMRobertsP (2016) Prison Privatisation in Australia: The State of the Nation. Australia: University of Sydney Sydney.
7.
BaxterPJackS (2008) Qualitative case study methodology: Study design implementation for novice researchers. The qualitative report13(4): 544–559.
8.
BousbahiFAlrazganMS (2015) Investigating IT faculty resistance to learning management system adoption using latent variables in an acceptance technology model. The Scientific World Journal2015.
CooperMColwellCJelfsA (2007) Embedding Accessibility Usability: Considerations for E-Learning Research Development Projects. Taylor and Francis.
11.
De SmetCSchellensTDe WeverB, et al. (2016) The design implementation of learning paths in a learning management system. Interactive Learning Environments24(6): 1076–1096.
12.
DodsonMNKitburiKBergeZL (2015) Possibilities for MOOCs in corporate training development. Performance Improvement54(10): 14–21.
13.
GenemoHMiahSJMcAndrewA (2015) A Design Science Research Methodology for developing a Computer-Aided Assessment Approach using Method Marking Concept, Education and Information Technologies, 20, 1769–1784.
IsrailidisJSiachouEKellyS (2020) Why organizations fail to share knowledge: An empirical investigation opportunities for improvement. Information Technology and People.
20.
KakasevskiGMihajlovMArsenovskiS, et al. (2008) Evaluating usability in learning management system Moodle, 1330–1012.
21.
KapoAMujkicATuruljaL, et al. (2020) Continuous e-learning at the workplace: the passport for the future of knowledge. Information Technology and People.
22.
KimilogluHOzturanMKutluB (2017) Perceptions about and attitude toward the usage of e-learning in corporate training, Computers in Human Behavior, 72: 339–349.
KumarBAMohiteP (2018) Usability of mobile learning applications: A systematic literature review. Journal of Computers in Education5(1): 1–17.
25.
LittellJHCorcoranJPillaiV (2008) Systematic Reviews Meta-Analysis. Oxford University Press.
26.
LittleB (2015) The purchasing– practical benefits–of a learning management system. Industrial Commercial Training.
27.
MahoneyNRBolMVRamuluPY, et al. (2016) Implementing an electronic learning management system for an ophthalmology residency program. BMC medical Education16(1): 1–4.
28.
MalhotraTJJainS (2017) Organisational culture its contribution to satisfaction of employees-a connotation to telecom sector in rajasthan. Indian Journal of Commerce70(3).
29.
Medina-FloresRMorales-GamboaR (2015) Usability evaluation by experts of a learning management system’. Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de10(4): 197–203.
30.
MelisEWeberMAndrèsE (2003) Lessons for (pedagogic) usability of eLearning systems. In: E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, Higher Education. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), 281–284.
31.
MiahSJ (2004) Accessibility improvement of multicultural educational Web interface by using the user centred design (UCD) approach. In Proceedings of the 2004 Informing Science and IT Education Joint Conference and Journal of issues in informing science and information technology, 4, 99–108. ISSN 1547–5859.
32.
MiahSJ (2008) An ontology based design environment for rural decision support Unpublished PhD, Griffith Business School, Griffith University, QLD, Australia.
33.
MiahSJ (2009) End user as application developer for decision support, In Proceedings of the 15th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2009, San Francisco, California, USA, August 6-9, 2009, p.1–10.
34.
MiahSJAhamedR (2011) A cloud-based DSS model for driver safety and monitoring on Australian roads. International Journal of Emerging Sciences, 1(4): 634.
35.
MiahSJGammackJ (2008) A mashup architecture for Web end-user application designs. In: Second IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (IEEE DEST 2008): Phitsanulok, Thailand, 26-29 February 2008, pp. 532–537.
36.
MiahSJGammackJGKerrDV (2012) A Socio-technical Approach to Designing and Evaluating Industry Oriented Applications, Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 15 (2):163–175.
37.
MiahSJKerrDGammackJCowanT (2008) A generic design environment for the rural industry knowledge acquisition, Knowledge-Based Systems, 21 (8): 892–899.
NezamMHKAtaffarAIsfahaniAN, et al. (2016) Human capital new product development performance efficiency-the mediating role of organisational learning capability. International Journal of Innovation Learning20(1): 26–46.
40.
Nurakun KyzyZIsmailovaRDündarH (2018) Learning management system implementation: A case study in the Kyrgyz republic. Interactive Learning Environments26(8): 1010–1022.
41.
ParkYJoIH (2017) Using log variables in a learning management system to evaluate learning activity using the lens of activity theory. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education42(4): 531–547.
42.
PetticrewMRobertsH (2008) Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. John Wiley and Sons.
43.
SaidinSSIskandarYHP (2016) Proposed model to evaluate the impact of e-training on work performance among IT employees in Malaysia, IEEE Conf. on e-Learning, e-Management and e-Services, Langkawi, pp. 17–22.
44.
ShahidSAbbasiMS (2014) Usability testing of an E-learning system: A comparative study of two evaluation techniques. IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering (IOSR-JCE16(6): 39–43.
45.
ShinWSKangM (2015) The use of a mobile learning management system at an online university its effect on learning satisfaction achievement. International Review of Research in Open Distributed Learning16(3): 110–130.
46.
SimonH (1996) The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47.
SriprasertpapK (2015) The development of online training model for srinakharinwirot university in Thailand. Procedia-Social Behavioral Sciences197: 1913–1917.
48.
StoffregenJPawlowskiJMPirkkalainenH (2015) A barrier framework for open e-learning in public administrations. Computers in Human Behavior51: 674–684.
49.
VaishnaviVKuechlerW (2007) Design Science Research Methods Patterns: Innovating Information Communication Technology. New York: Auerbach Publication.
50.
Van KuijkJvan DrielLvan EijkD (2015) Usability in product development practice; an exploratory case study comparing four markets. Applied Ergonomics47: 308–323.
51.
WalkerDSLindnerJRMurphreyTP, et al. (2016) Learning management system usage. Quarterly Review of Distance Education17(2): 41–50.
52.
ZhangBYinCDavidB, et al. (2016) Facilitating professionals’ work-based learning with context-aware mobile system. Science of Computer Programming129: 3–19.
