This paper reports the results of the study which analysed OPAC users’ searching behaviour through the use of search queries. The study analysed how OPAC search queries can be used to assess the effectiveness of the information literacy programme offered by the University of Dar es Salaam. Data were collected unobtrusively and stored in the OPAC web server’s log file. OPAC search logs were qualitatively and quantitatively analysed to determine search patterns and search query formulation. Information literacy course contents were also qualitatively analysed and compared with users’ search activities. The results suggest that search query logs are essential and high quality evidence that can be used to inform information literacy pedagogical methods and course contents improvement. A comparison between OPAC users’ search behaviours and information lteracy course content identified some areas for readjusting the way information literacy instructions are delivered and improving OPAC search functionalities. The study has contributed to the conceptual understanding and the use of evidence to support evidence-informed practices (EIPs) in delivering information literacy courses.
AllenLETaylorDM (2017) The role of academic library information specialists (LIS) in teaching and learning in 21st century. Information Discovery and Delivery15(1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-09-2016-0030
2.
AverySTracyDG (2014) Using transaction log analysis to assess student search behavior in the library instruction classroom. Reference Services Review42(2): 320–335.
3.
BoothABriceA (Eds.) (2004) Evidence Based Practice for Information Professionals: A Handbook. London: Facet Publishing.
4.
CarberyALeahyS (2015) Evidence-based instruction: Assessing student work using rubrics and citation analysis to inform instructional design. Journal of Information Literacy9(1): 74–90. https://doi.org/10.11645/9.1.1980.
5.
CherylK (1983) OPAC User Logs: Implications for bibliographic instruction. Library Hi Tech1(3): 27–35.
6.
Cobus-KuoLWallerJ (2016) Teaching information literacy and evidence-based practice in an undergraduate speech-language pathology program: A student reflection. Contemporary Issues in Communication and Science Disorder43: 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1044/cicsd_43_S_35
7.
DillKSheraW (2012) Implementing Evidence Informed Practices: International Perspective. Toronto: Canadian Scholar Press.
8.
FresnidoAMBBarsagaAS (2019) Transaction log analysis of OPAC searches in an academic library: Basis for OPAC interface improvement. Philippines Journal of Library and Information Studies39(1): 29–40. Available at:https://phjlis.org/index.php/phjlis/article/view/5/12
9.
HepworthMWemaE (2006). The design and implementation of an information literacy training course that integrated Information and Library Science conceptions of information literacy, educational theory and information behaviour research: A Tanzanian pilot study. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Science5(1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.11120/ital.2006.05010005
10.
INASP (2004) The use and impact of electronic resources in academic and research institutions in Tanzania. INASP country report.
11.
JansenBJ (2006) Search log analysis: what it is, what’s been done, how to do it. Library and Information Science Research28: 407–432.
12.
JansenBTaksaISpinkA (2009) Research and methodological foundations of transaction log analysis. In JansenBTaksaISpinkA(2009)Handbook of Research on Web Analysis. New York: Information Science Reference, 1–17.
13.
Kern-SimirenkoC (1983) OPAC User Logs: Implications for Bibliographic Instruction. Library Hi-Tech1(3):27–35.
14.
KlomsriTTedreM (2016) Poor information literacy skills and practices as barriers to academic performance: A mixed methods study of the University of Dar es Salaam. Reference and User Quarterly55(4):293–305.
15.
KnievelJWakimotoJCHolladayS (2009) Does interface design influence catalog use? A case study. College and Research Libraries70(5): 446–459.
16.
KoufogiannakisD (2012) What is evidence?Evidence Based Library and Information Practices6(2): 1–3.
17.
KumarS (2011) Effect of web searching on the OPAC: A comparison of selected university libraries. Library High Tech News28(6): 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/07419051111173883
18.
LuptonM (2008) Evidence, argument and social responsibility: First-year students’ experiences of information literacy when researching an essay. Higher Education Research & Development27(4): 399–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360802406858
19.
LwehaburaMJStilwellC (2008) Information literacy in Tanzanian universities: Challenges and potential opportunities. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science40(3): 179–191.
20.
LwehaburaMJ (2016) An assessment of information literacy skills among first-year postgraduate students at Sokoine University of Agriculture Tanzania. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science50(4): 427–434.
21.
MungwabiH (2019) The effectiveness of library information literacy given to undergraduate students at the university of Dar es Salaam. University of Dar es Salaam Library Journal14(2):99–112.
22.
NahotkoM (2020) OPAC development as the genre transition process, Part 1: OPAC generations historical development. Annals of Library and Information Studies67(June): 107–117. Available at: http://eprints.rclis.org/40413/1/ALIS%2067%282%29%20107-117.pdf
23.
NdumbaroF (2018) Understanding user-system interactions: An analysis of OPAC users’ digital footprints. Information Development31(3): 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666917693885
24.
NiuXZhangTChenH (2014) Study of user search activities with two discovery tools at an academic library. International Journal of Human-Computer Interactions30: 422–433. http://dx/doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2013.873281
25.
NelsonJL (1992) An analysis of transaction logs to evaluate the educational needs of end users. Medical Reference Services Quarterly11(4): 11–21. DOI: 10.1300/j115v11n04_02
NevoISlonim-NevoV (2011) The myth of evidence-based practice: Towards evidence-informed practice. The British Journal of Social Work41(6): 1176–1197. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq149
28.
OberliesMKBuxtonKZeidman-KarpinskiA (2020) Adapting Evidence-Based Practices to Improve Library Instruction: Using customized tools to support peer mentoring and observation. New Review of Academic Librarianship26(1): 6–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2019.1628078
UrbanoCZhangYDowneyKKlinglerT (2015) Library catalog log analysis in E-book patron-driven acquisition (PDA): A case study. College and Research Libraries (May): 412–426.1. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.76.4.412
31.
WemaEHepworthM (2007) Av evaluation of an information literacy training initiative at the University of Dar es Salaam. Journal of Information Literacy1(1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.11645/1.1.4
32.
WuDBiR (2017) Query Reformulation Pattern in Cross-device OPAC search. ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JDCL). 10.1109/JCDL.2017.7991613
33.
WuDLiangSBiR (2018) Characterizing queries in cross-device OPAC search: A large-scale log study. Library Hi Tech36(3): 482–497. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-06-2017-0130
34.
ZhaoJ C (2015) Making information literacy instruction relevant: A needs assessment approach at McGill University. Science and Technology Libraries34(3): 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2015.1089815
