The current research aimed to develop and evaluate a fundamental and international model for assessment of electronic readiness (e-readiness) in university libraries, following an extensive investigation of existing theoretical frameworks at national, international and organizational levels. Documentary research and analytical survey were the methods used in this study. Considering the factor loading using CFA and path analysis, the weights of every indicator, component and dimension were analyzed using SEM method. The model of assessing e-readiness constituted 4 dimensions, 12 factors and 64 indicators based on the research literature and on the opinions of related experts. Convergent validity, composite reliability and Cronbach’s alpha of all components were analyzed. Results from the CFA were then analyzed according to the structural model and indices related to goodness of fit for ensuring high quality on measuring the variables identified. Path analysis showed that human resources, electronic infrastructure, network programs and services and enablers of the networked world have a direct effect upon electronic readiness with values 0.57, 0.68, 0.77 and 0.51 respectively. Further analysis showed that the indicators skills, software, information services and investment are of higher weight and impact in their equivalent dimension. The proposed model was finally used for evaluating the e-readiness of the libraries located at one of the largest universities in Iran which showed their low readiness regarding electronic infrastructures as well as some discrepancies.
AlaarajHIbrahimFW (2014) An overview and classification of e-readiness assessment models. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications4(12): 25–36.
2.
AlghamdiI AGoodwinRRampersadG (2014) Organizational e-government readiness: an investigation in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Business and Management9(5): 43–61.
3.
BaradaranVFarokhiSAhamdiZ (2018) A Model for Evaluation and Development of Citizens’ Electronic Readiness for Deployment of an E-City Using Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Global Information Management26(4): 135–157.
4.
BenssamATaboudjematNNNoualiO (2016) An e-readiness assessment model for disaster management. International Journal of Information Technology and Management15(2): 109–123.
5.
ChoiH (2016) Rethinking the assessment of e-government implementation in developing countries from the perspective of the design–reality gap: Applications in the Indonesian e-procurement system. Telecommunications Policy6(2): 123–137.
6.
DitimiAAyandaD (2013) A comparative analysis of e-readiness assessment in Nigerian Private Universities. Information and Knowledge Management3(11): 30–38
7.
DrigasASKoukianakisL (2013) E-government applications for the information society. International Journal of Computer Science Issues10(2): 1–13.
8.
DukicDDukicGBertovicN (2017) Public administration employees’ readiness and acceptance of e-government: findings from a Croatian survey. Information Development33(5): 525–539.
9.
FathianMAkhavanPHooraliM (2008) E-readiness Assessment of non-profit ICT SMES in a Developing Country: The Case of Iran. Technovation28(9): 578–590.
10.
FesenkoTFesenkoG (2016) E-readiness evaluation modelling for monitoring the national e-government program (by the example of Ukraine). Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies11(3): 212–223.
11.
FornellCLarckerDF (1981) Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18(1): 39–50.
12.
GlendaH.GayE. (2017). An assessment of online instructor e-learning readiness before, during and after course delivery. Journal of Computer High Education, 7(2), 128–141.
13.
HlelaSCoetzeeSCooperA (2016) Evaluating a public sector organization for SDI readiness– the case of a South African government department. South African Journal of Geomatics5(2): 125–138.
14.
HanafizadehPHanafizadehMRKhodabakhshiM (2008) Taxonomy of e-readiness assessment measures. International Journal of Information Management29:189–195.
15.
HanafizadehMRHanafizadehPSaghaeiA (2009) The pros and cons of digital divide and e-readiness assessments. International Journal of E-Adoption1(3):1–29.
16.
HusainSNazimM (2015) Use of different information and communication technologies in Indian academic libraries. Library Review64(1/2): 135–153.
17.
Isfandyari-MoghaddamASedehiMDehghaniMNemati AnarakiLHasanzadeh DizajiE (2013) The status of information technology in Iranian hospital libraries: a comparative study of managers’ attitude. Program47(3): 220–238.
18.
KeikhaZOukatiMS (2015) The e-readiness assessment pattern designing with an approach to ecommerce (A case study conducted in Sistan and Balouchestan province of Iran). International Journal of Engineering Research4(2): 85–92.
19.
KimHJHongAJSongHD (2019) The roles of academic engagement and digital readiness in students’ achievements in university e-learning environments, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16 (21). Available at: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186%2Fs41239-019-0152-3.pdf(accessed 31 December 2019).
20.
KinBAYoungbloodNE (2016) E-government in Alabama: an analysis of county voting and election website content, usability, accessibility and mobile readiness. Government Information Quarterly33(2): 715–726.
21.
KhaembaSNMukethaGMMatokeN (2017) Factors affecting citizen readiness for e-government systems in Kenya. Journal of Research in Engineering and Applied Sciences2(2): 13–27.
22.
KuchiT (2006) Communicating mission: an analysis of academic library web sites. The Journal of Academic Librarianship32(2): 148–154.
23.
KumarPGoudarK (2013) ICT skills of library professionals in Gulbarga city. Indian Streams Research Journal2(12): 17–97.
24.
LouEWLeeAGouldingJ (2020) E-readiness in construction (ERiC): self-assessment framework for UK small and medium enterprise building services providers, Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 16(1): 3–22.
25.
MabeLKOladeleI (2015) E-readiness among male and female extension officers in north-west province, South Africa. Journal of Agricultural and Food Information16(1): 315–325.
26.
MahdianZ (2013) Survey of the E-readiness in the Shiraz Medical University libraries from the Managers’ Viewpoint. Master Thesis, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Iran [in Persian].
27.
MalikiZ (2015) Information and communication technologies role in developing electronic libraries and information centers. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology71(2): 167–183.
28.
McGeeR (2006) Information technology (IT) strategic planning for libraries. Library management27(6/7): 470–485.
29.
MontgomeryDCRungerGC (2003) Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers, 3rd Edition, John Wiley and Son, Inc., Hoboken. Available at: http://www.um.edu.ar/math/montgomery.pdf (accessed 31 December 2019).
30.
Motahari NezhadHShekoftehMKazeraniM (2018) E-readiness assessment of academic libraries: a case study in Iran. The Electronic Library36(2): 193–207
31.
MutulaSVan BrakelP (2006a) An Evaluation of E-readiness Assessment Tools with Respect to Information Access: towards an integrated information rich tool. International Journal of Information Management26: 212–223.
32.
MutulaSVan BrakelP (2006b) E-readiness of SMEs in the ICT Sector in Botswana With respect to information access. The Electronic Library24(3): 402–417.
33.
Nkwe N (2012) E-government: Challenges and opportunities in Botswana. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science2(17): 102–115.
34.
SaleemAShabana TabusumSZSadik BatchaM (2013) Application and uses of information communication technology (ICT) in academic libraries: an overview. International Journal of Library Science2(3): 49–52.
35.
TaylorDM (2016) The impact of mobile information communication and technology (ICT) in ubiquitous health sciences libraries. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries13(3): 105–113.
36.
WaheduzzamanWMiahSJ (2015) Readiness assessment of e-government: A developing country perspective. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy9(4): 498–516.
37.
YaghoubiNFallah TaftiSHazratiM (2011) E-readiness measurement through fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) case study Tehran sotck exchange. Australian journal of basic and applied sciences, 5(3): 436–441.
