Due to the intense competition, it is crucial for online health communities to facilitate users’ participation and retain them. Drawing on the social capital theory, this research examined users’ participation in online health communities. The results indicated that social support, which includes informational support and emotional support, has a significant effect on social capital, which in turn affects users’ participation including health knowledge acquisition and contribution. The results imply that online health communities need to create a supportive climate in order to develop social capital and facilitate users’ participation.
AtanasovaSKaminTPetričG (2018) The benefits and challenges of online professional-patient interaction: Comparing views between users and health professional moderators in an online health community. Computers in Human Behavior83: 106–118.
2.
BaronRMKennyDA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51(6): 1173–1182.
3.
CarilloKHuffSChawnerB (2017) What makes a good contributor? Understanding contributor behavior within large free/open source software projects – A socialization perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems26(4): 322–359.
4.
ChenC-JHungS-W (2010) To give or to receive? Factors influencing members’ knowledge sharing and community promotion in professional virtual communities. Information & Management47(4): 226–236.
5.
ChenJShenX-L (2015) Consumers’ decisions in social commerce context: An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems79: 55–64.
6.
ChengXGuYShenJ (2019) An integrated view of particularized trust in social commerce: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Information Management45: 1–12.
7.
ChiuC-MHsuM-HWangETG (2006) Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems42(3): 1872–1888.
8.
CNNIC (2017) China Statistical Report on Internet Development. China Internet Network Information Center.
9.
FanHMLedermanR (2018) Online health communities: how do community members build the trust required to adopt information and form close relationships?European Journal of Information Systems27(1): 62–89.
10.
GefenDStraubDWBoudreauMC (2000) Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems4(7): 1–70.
11.
HajliNSimsJZadehAHRichardM-O (2017) A social commerce investigation of the role of trust in a social networking site on purchase intentions. Journal of Business Research71: 133–141.
12.
HuangQChenXYOuCXDavisonRMHuaZS (2017) Understanding buyers’ loyalty to a C2C platform: the roles of social capital, satisfaction and perceived effectiveness of e-commerce institutional mechanisms. Information Systems Journal27(1): 91–119.
13.
KordzadehNWarrenJ (2017) Communicating personal health information in virtual health communities: an integration of privacy calculus model and affective commitment. Journal of the Association for Information Systems18(1): 45–81.
14.
KordzadehNWarrenJSeifiA (2016) Antecedents of privacy calculus components in virtual health communities. International Journal of Information Management36(5): 724–734.
15.
LefebvreVMSorensonDHenchionMGellynckX (2016) Social capital and knowledge sharing performance of learning networks. International Journal of Information Management36(4): 570–579.
16.
LiC.-YKuY.-C (2018) The power of a thumbs-up: Will e-commerce switch to social commerce?Information & Management55(3): 340–357.
17.
LiYBWangXQ (2018) Seeking health information on social media: a perspective of trust, self-determination, and social support. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing30(1): 1–22.
18.
LiangT-PHoY-TLiY-WTurbanE (2011) What drives social commerce: The role of social support and relationship quality. International Journal of Electronic Commerce16(2): 69–90.
19.
LinXFeathermanMSarkerS (2017) Understanding factors affecting users’ social networking site continuance: A gender difference perspective. Information & Management54(3): 383–395.
20.
LiuLCheungCMKLeeMKO (2016) An empirical investigation of information sharing behavior on social commerce sites. International Journal of Information Management36(5): 686–699.
21.
LiuXSunMLiJ (2018) Research on gender differences in online health communities. International Journal of Medical Informatics111: 172–181.
22.
LiuZWangX (2018) How to regulate individuals’ privacy boundaries on social network sites: A cross-cultural comparison. Information & Management55(8): 1005–1023.
23.
MalhotraNKKimSSPatilA (2006) Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science52(12): 1865–1883.
24.
MamonovSKoufarisMBenbunan-FichR (2016) The role of the sense of community in the sustainability of social network sites. International Journal of Electronic Commerce20(4): 470–498.
25.
MayerRCDavisJHSchoormanFD (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review20(3): 709–734.
26.
MpinganjiraM (2018) Precursors of trust in virtual health communities: A hierarchical investigation. Information & Management55(6): 686–694.
27.
NahapietJGhoshalS (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review23(2): 242–266.
28.
NajjarMSDahabiyehLNawaysehM (2019) Share if you care: The impact of information sharing and information quality on humanitarian supply chain performance - a social capital perspective. Information Development35(3): 467–481.
29.
PeletJEEttisSCowartK (2017) Optimal experience of flow enhanced by telepresence: Evidence from social media use. Information & Management54(1): 115–128.
30.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJYPodsakoffNP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88(5): 879–903.
31.
RidingsCMGefenDArinzeB (2002) Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities. Journal of Strategic Information Systems11(3): 271–295.
32.
SunYFangYLimKHStraubD (2012) User satisfaction with information technology service delivery: A social capital perspective. Information Systems Research23(4): 1195–1211.
33.
TajvidiMWangYHajliNLovePED (2019) Brand value co-creation in social commerce: The role of interactivity, social support, and relationship quality. Computers in Human BehaviorIn press.
34.
TsaiJC-AHungS-Y (2019) Examination of community identification and interpersonal trust on continuous use intention: Evidence from experienced online community members. Information & Management56(4): 552–569.
35.
WanJLuYWangBZhaoL (2017) How attachment influences users’ willingness to donate to content creators in social media: A socio-technical systems perspective. Information & Management54(7): 837–850.
36.
WangTYehRKJChenCTsydypovZ (2016) What drives electronic word-of-mouth on social networking sites? Perspectives of social capital and self-determination. Telematics and Informatics33(4): 1034–1047.
37.
WangTYehRKJYenDC (2015) Influence of customer identification on online usage and purchasing behaviors in social commerce. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction31(11): 805–814.
38.
WangYHerrandoC (2019) Does privacy assurance on social commerce sites matter to millennials?International Journal of Information Management44: 164–177.
39.
WuTLDengZHZhangDLBuchananPRZhaDQWangRX (2018) Seeking and using intention of health information from doctors in social media: The effect of doctor-consumer interaction. International Journal of Medical Informatics115: 106–113.
40.
XuJCenfetelliRTAquinoK (2016) Do different kinds of trust matter? An examination of the three trusting beliefs on satisfaction and purchase behavior in the buyer–seller context. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems25(1): 15–31.
41.
YahiaIBAl-NeamaNKerbacheL (2018) Investigating the drivers for social commerce in social media platforms: Importance of trust, social support and the platform perceived usage. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services41: 11–19.
42.
YanLTanY (2014) Feeling blue? Go online: An empirical study of social support among patients. Information Systems Research25(4): 690–709.
43.
YanZWangTChenYZhangH (2016) Knowledge sharing in online health communities: A social exchange theory perspective. Information & Management53(5): 643–653.
44.
YangSQLiuYWeiJ (2016) Social capital on mobile SNS addiction A perspective from online and offline channel integrations. Internet Research26(4): 982–1000.
45.
ZhangCBLiYNWuBLiDJ (2017a) How WeChat can retain users: Roles of network externalities, social interaction ties, and perceived values in building continuance intention. Computers in Human Behavior69: 284–293.
46.
ZhangXLiuSChenXWangLGaoBZhuQ (2018) Health information privacy concerns, antecedents, and information disclosure intention in online health communities. Information & Management55(4): 482–493.
47.
ZhangXLiuSDengZChenX (2017b) Knowledge sharing motivations in online health communities: A comparative study of health professionals and normal users. Computers in Human Behavior75 (Supplement C): 797–810.
